cyclops wrote:Always trying to refute the expert solution I thought I found the refutation.
$$c $$ +----------------------- $$ | . . . . 6 . 1 5 . . . $$ | . O 2 O X X . . 3 4 . $$ | 8 X 7 X X O X X O . . $$ | . O X X O O . . O , . $$ | . O O O . . . a . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
[go]$$c $$ +----------------------- $$ | . . . . 6 . 1 5 . . . $$ | . O 2 O X X . . 3 4 . $$ | 8 X 7 X X O X X O . . $$ | . O X X O O . . O , . $$ | . O O O . . . a . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]
But, of course, it fails. W's containment is too weak. B easily walks out at a. The problem depends on W being weak around there. Correct?
This is an ancient problem. In ancient problems escape was a factor. Modern compositions tend to be self contained. Different conventions, I suppose, the ancient convention being that the unshown part of the board is empty, the modern convention being that the unshown part of the board is unknown.
I was relieved when someone suggested the shown 2 as my first instinct was that black still didn't have two eyes.
Assuming the rest of the board is unknown the white stones still haven't got two eyes either... I had been expecting a cleaner solution but I think that it is a more solution than you often see in modern problems.
I haven't played go for a very long time (if you don't count a computer program that was described on one website as the strongest free program but so many weaknesses didn't have a live stone.) and I am not sure that I would have expected the line to run to 'a'.
Marcus wrote:I leave continuations and alternate variations to the viewer.
It's just my way of saying "I'm too lazy to figure out why this doesn't work", but I liked the variations I spotted, and couldn't immediately see a refutation. Silly me, I should have known there would be one ... I still haven't taken the time to look at it yet ... and, I just found it, I think, while typing this:
$$W White to kill $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . W . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . O O O O O O . , . $$ | O O X X . X X O . . . $$ | X X 3 X 2 . X O . W . $$ | X X 5 1 4 . . X . . . $$ ----------------------
[go]$$W White to kill $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . W . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . O O O O O O . , . $$ | O O X X . X X O . . . $$ | X X 3 X 2 . X O . W . $$ | X X 5 1 4 . . X . . . $$ ----------------------[/go]
Under the stones again for the win!
$$W White to kill $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . W . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . O O O O O O . , . $$ | O O X X . X X O . . . $$ | X X . X 2 . X O . W . $$ | X X a 1 4 3 b X . . . $$ ----------------------
[go]$$W White to kill $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . W . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . O O O O O O . , . $$ | O O X X . X X O . . . $$ | X X . X 2 . X O . W . $$ | X X a 1 4 3 b X . . . $$ ----------------------[/go]
a and b are miai for Black to live, if White plays a, Black can play b and count on that under the stones thing again for the 2nd eye.
$$W White to kill $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . W . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . O O O O O O . , . $$ | O O X X . X X O . . . $$ | X X . X . . X O . W . $$ | X X . . . . . X . . . $$ ----------------------
[go]$$W White to kill $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . W . . . . . . . . . $$ | . . O O O O O O . , . $$ | O O X X . X X O . . . $$ | X X . X . . X O . W . $$ | X X . . . . . X . . . $$ ----------------------[/go]
HermanHiddema wrote:@jts: That's not a modern problem! ......
$$c Black to live or make a ko i suppose. $$ --------------------------------------- $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . O . O X X O O . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . X . X X O X X O . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . O X X O O . . O , . . . . . , . . . | $$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ ---------------------------------------
[go]$$c Black to live or make a ko i suppose. $$ --------------------------------------- $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . O . O X X O O . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . X . X X O X X O . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . O X X O O . . O , . . . . . , . . . | $$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Herman solved this intriguing tsumego in the forward drive. How about going in reverse drive.
$$c W to move $$ --------------------------------------- $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . a . O X X O O . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . X . X X O X X O . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . O X X O O . . O , . . . . . , . . . | $$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ ---------------------------------------
[go]$$c W to move $$ --------------------------------------- $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . a . O X X O O . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . X . X X O X X O . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . O X X O O . . O , . . . . . , . . . | $$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | $$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
It seems Wa is the only move to prevent unconditional black live. So this diagram solves the tsumego backwards. How far can we thus rewind the position? Is reverse tsumego a respectable aberation? Or should I seek help? Had it a name already? And then what about allowing tenuki ? ( But not two consecutive tenuki, and only if alternate reversing is impossible )