Re: Out of stones
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:07 pm
tundra wrote:Now, is this scenario possible in a "real" game, between "self-respecting" players?
thanks, you made me smile today
thanks, you made me smile today
Life In 19x19
Life in 19x19. Go, Weiqi, Baduk... Thats the life.
https://lifein19x19.com/
Out of stones
Page 3 of 3
thanks, you made me smile today
Re: Out of stones
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:48 pm
OT, I love how the "no true Scotsman" fallacy has "For the practice of wearing a kilt without undergarments, see True Scotsman." in a tagline under the title.
Re: Out of stones
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:18 pm
I feel like this is a question for KGS statistics.
Has there ever been a game in which one side played more than 181 moves?
If so, has there been a game in this set where the number of shared prisoners was less than the number that one side played over 181 moves?
I feel like it's possible and probably happened. (Especially in Computer: New Zealand matches)
Has there ever been a game in which one side played more than 181 moves?
If so, has there been a game in this set where the number of shared prisoners was less than the number that one side played over 181 moves?
I feel like it's possible and probably happened. (Especially in Computer: New Zealand matches)