Page 3 of 3
Re: simple counting
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:07 am
by RobertJasiek
Annihilist wrote:This system seems unnecessary. What's wrong with the current system?
Which system are you referring to?
Re: simple counting
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:42 pm
by Annihilist
RobertJasiek wrote:Annihilist wrote:This system seems unnecessary. What's wrong with the current system?
Which system are you referring to?
Whichever one we use. Territory or Area scoring. It doesn't matter. Neither need improvement I don't think.
Re: simple counting
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:24 am
by RobertJasiek
Annihilist wrote:Territory or Area scoring. [...] Neither need improvement
Area scoring:
It does not need improvement, but rules that mention life and death can be improved by not mentioning life and death.
Territory scoring:
It depends on which form of territory scoring is meant; usually the referred to form is life-and-death-territory-scoring in the Japanese / Korean style. Extremely great improvements are possible for every particular ruleset of that style. E.g., the various exceptions apparent from
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/wagcflaw.htmlhttp://home.snafu.de/jasiek/j1989c.htmlhttp://home.snafu.de/jasiek/difference_ ... rules.htmlcould be cut down to a reasonably small amount in
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/sj.htmlNote that the remaining exceptions are major ones. In particular, there are different rules for the alternation and the analysis at all.