Page 3 of 17
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:37 am
by EdLee
$$Wm26
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm26
Rejected variation:
$$W
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$W
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 2:51 am
by LexC
$$Bm27
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm27
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:37 am
by Celebrir
$$Wm1
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm1
I wonder what the biggest move is here.
looks nice because it threatens the connection at 'a' which would also threaten a cut. Besides the W corner there doesn't look very solid without this move. But 'b' looks also big because I wouldn't like B to get 'c'...
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:38 am
by EdLee
$$Wm28
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm28
Ideas:
(a) follow-up;
to reduce the influence of
area stones:
$$Wm28
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm28
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 4:22 am
by LexC
$$Bm29
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm29[/Hide]
Need to live in sente
$$Bm29
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm29
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 4:43 am
by SoDesuNe
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 5:07 am
by EdLee
B aims at (a). If W gets sente again...
$$
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:38 am
by EdLee
$$Wm30
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm30
Seems
is gote. The last area where B has any development is the
stones,
so the focus is to reduce it as much as possible (via
's), hopefully making the tengen
very misplaced/inefficient:
$$
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 3:03 am
by LexC
$$Bm31
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm31
$$Bm31
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm31
The points looks good baalanced
$$Bm31
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm31
a and b looks miai so I can play this follow up
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 3:09 am
by EdLee
LexC, did you play? (That board looks the same.)
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 5:19 am
by LexC
$$Bm31
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm31
forget my move
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 5:56 am
by EdLee
$$Wm32
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm32
If
, locally there's a shape problem for B later. And of course, B is looking at (a).
$$B
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$B
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 2:26 am
by LexC
$$Bm33
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm33
Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 8:06 am
by EdLee
$$Wm34
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm34
Possible continuation:
$$B
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$B
Re: 165 LexC vs EdLee
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 8:14 am
by emeraldemon
LexC predicted 'a' below, EdLee showed 'b':
$$Wm34
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm34
'a' seems better to me if black has to hane underneath:
$$Wm36 Black has cutting points
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm36 Black has cutting points$$Wm36 black gets off easy
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm36 black gets off easy
So maybe the question is if black can play this way:
$$Wm36
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wm36
looks nice because it threatens the connection at 'a' which would also threaten a cut. Besides the W corner there doesn't look very solid without this move. But 'b' looks also big because I wouldn't like B to get 'c'...
(a) follow-up; 
to reduce the influence of 
area stones:
is gote. The last area where B has any development is the 
very misplaced/inefficient:
, locally there's a shape problem for B later. And of course, B is looking at (a).