Research in Go - 2011

Higher level discussions, analysis of professional games, etc., go here.
User avatar
gogameguru
Lives in gote
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:18 pm
Rank: 5d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 357 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by gogameguru »

John Fairbairn wrote:As it covers the basics so well, I even think it's a shame that so much money was spent, with the best of intentions, by Oriental organisations on things like freebies to the WAGC for a handful of people. If they had spent some of that money on having this book translated (not by me, I hasten to add!), far more westerners would have seen the benefit of the money and we would have a much better grounding.

This is neither here nor there, but I sometimes wish some of this money were spent on putting copies of the Elementary Go Series and similar books in public libraries. When you think about it, there are already a lot of really excellent books in English. As great as it would be to have more books translated (especially the very good Chinese encyclopedias) I wonder if we would do more good by making these existing books more widely and easily available. Having used copies of Attack and Defense on Amazon for $93 each doesn't count.


I agree, and improving the distribution of Go books is one of the goals of Go Game Guru. Unfortunately, I've found the major publishers fairly reluctant to sell books wholesale. I'm variously told that business is either too good or too bad to want to sell books to third parties. I can believe one or the other, but not both.

Here's a simple observation, from a simple mind perhaps... When you don't sell books, you don't end up selling any books.
RobertJasiek
Judan
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
Been thanked: 797 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by RobertJasiek »

gogameguru wrote:I've found the major publishers fairly reluctant to sell books wholesale.


Try the minor publishers! E.g., ask me!
John Fairbairn
Oza
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:09 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 4672 times

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by John Fairbairn »

I agree, and improving the distribution of Go books is one of the goals of Go Game Guru. Unfortunately, I've found the major publishers fairly reluctant to sell books wholesale. I'm variously told that business is either too good or too bad to want to sell books to third parties. I can believe one or the other, but not both.

Here's a simple observation, from a simple mind perhaps... When you don't sell books, you don't end up selling any books.


I know this is extremely disingenuous because David wrote to GoGoD at great length and explained rather more than he does here. For example, he reported that at least one company wanted to impose a possibly perfectly reasonable condition that he he did not compete with them in their own area. There were other factors not mentioned here, but we must not stray into commercial confidences.
User avatar
gogameguru
Lives in gote
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:18 pm
Rank: 5d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 357 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by gogameguru »

RobertJasiek wrote:
gogameguru wrote:I've found the major publishers fairly reluctant to sell books wholesale.


Try the minor publishers! E.g., ask me!


Thanks Robert. I haven't had an opportunity to read your books yet, but I've heard good things about them. I'd like to read them myself first and if they're as good as they're reputed to be, we'd be happy to sell them. If you contact me by private message or email us using the address on this page: http://gogameguru.com/contact/ we can discuss the details.
User avatar
gogameguru
Lives in gote
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:18 pm
Rank: 5d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 357 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by gogameguru »

John Fairbairn wrote:
I agree, and improving the distribution of Go books is one of the goals of Go Game Guru. Unfortunately, I've found the major publishers fairly reluctant to sell books wholesale. I'm variously told that business is either too good or too bad to want to sell books to third parties. I can believe one or the other, but not both.

Here's a simple observation, from a simple mind perhaps... When you don't sell books, you don't end up selling any books.


I know this is extremely disingenuous because David wrote to GoGoD at great length and explained rather more than he does here. For example, he reported that at least one company wanted to impose a possibly perfectly reasonable condition that he he did not compete with them in their own area. There were other factors not mentioned here, but we must not stray into commercial confidences.


John, what precisely about my comment is 'extremely disingenuous'? My email, which you didn't reply to, but apparently read, was mostly technical details about how we could help you distribute GoGoD. Since you aren't interested in that, there's nothing left to discuss on that matter.

In the rest of the email I was asking for your help and advice regarding Slate and Shell. I had no intention of discussing Slate and Shell in particular here, but you're really not leaving me with a lot of choices, are you?

There's more to it than you know, and I really think you should talk to William Cobb about it. Also, you've completely misunderstood what I wrote in the email. Slate and Shell are very protective of the US market. Fine, we know that. But they also refused to sell us books which would be sold in the Australian and European markets. I know from the trial we ran earlier in the year that books sold from Australia will be purchased by people in the US, as well as other countries.

Slate and Shell are naive if they think their existing wholesale customers don't sell books back into the US. So I apparently just made the mistake of being too honest with William and telling him upfront that that would happen to a certain extent (and certainly does already). I was willing to find a solution to the issue of the US market, which is apparently a huge concerns of theirs. However, I do personally think they focus on this one thing too much, to the detriment of their business. We may disagree on that point, that's fine too.

I think the books you've written over the last few years, which we all know are published by Slate and Shell, are very good. They also publish other good books like the Shuko tesuji dictionaries, which I already mentioned earlier in this discussion. Because of that, I'd be happy to help Slate and Shell sell them in Australia and other countries, if they wanted to. That's really all there is to it fundamentally.

For what we're trying to achieve with Go Game Guru, we do need to earn a reasonable amount of money to promote the game in a financially sustainable way. Go books themselves are never going to be a big source of that income, we know that. That's not why we want to sell them. Improving their distribution is useful because it is yet another way to help promote Go using the existing resources.

If you're going to insist on taking things I've said out of context and repeating them here, just publish the whole text of my email discussion with T Mark and let people judge for themselves. The offer I made to you and T Mark was entirely in good faith, and I believe it was reasonable and very generous. There's nothing I said that I'm ashamed of anyway.

Otherwise, talk to your publisher and stop complaining about not selling enough Go books. I've watched you make frequent comments regarding the Go book market and refrained from saying anything for almost a year now. Next time, I'll remind you of this conversation...
tapir
Lives in sente
Posts: 774
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:52 pm
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 155 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by tapir »

Wikipedia has succeeded in popularizing human knowledge and keeping it fresh (in my opinion) but one cannot deny that Sensei's Library, "the" wikipedia for Go, has stalled.


Whatever keeping it fresh means, in many areas Wikipedia is a battleground for PR agencies, spin doctors and single interest people. It does a great job in listing all individual WW2 submarines, porn starns and television shows but usually fails in giving a balanced appreciation of anything controversial at all with the people able to write such content constantly retreating from Wikipedia and the format enforcers, recategorizers, interpunctionists, vandalism fighters ruling supreme.

See also: http://senseis.xmp.net/?SLIsNotWikipedia
User avatar
ez4u
Oza
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
Rank: Jp 6 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: ez4u
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 2351 times
Been thanked: 1332 times

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by ez4u »

tchan001 wrote:So what you are saying is that it is ok for non-chinese people to pirate chinese language go books because they can't read the language anyways. With the same logic perhaps it would seem ok for chinese people to pirate non-chinese go books since they can't read it much anyways and also because it has the potential to promote the sales of such books.

Well no, that is what you are saying. What I wrote is there for anyone to see. And anyone can use Google to look for whatever they like as well. When you publish your interpretation, that is you speaking. I realize that you are one of the Chinese speakers here, so you may feel differently about it than I do. That is fine. Feel free to express your opinion. However, you are wasting your time acting as my spokesperson.
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
User avatar
tchan001
Gosei
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:44 pm
GD Posts: 1292
Location: Hong Kong
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 534 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by tchan001 »

My opinion is that you chose to tell people in this forum that you deliberately downloaded a pdf of a copyrighted book mentioned on this thread. That is an act of piracy which you have documented yourself. You justified it as being ok by saying:
ez4u wrote:I was excited to find the copy because I wanted to know whether the material was interesting enough to warrant finding the book without being able to read Chinese (hence potentially helping sales!).

The logic of your statement is that it is ok to download a pirate pdf to see if it is interesting. I am just pointing out a logical extension of your position if someone presented the same type of argument in a different setting.

I don't think it is ok for you to tell people in a public forum to download a pdf just because it is available and just because you are unable to read the language. In my opinion, what you have accomplished is promotion of piracy of copyrighted material on a public forum.
http://tchan001.wordpress.com
A blog on Asian go books, go sightings, and interesting tidbits
Go is such a beautiful game.
User avatar
redponey
Dies with sente
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:04 pm
Rank: KGS 2K
GD Posts: 0
KGS: redponey
IGS: redponey
DGS: redponey
OGS: redponey
Kaya handle: redponey
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by redponey »

And now back to one of the more go related topics in this thread ....

It seems to me that anyone who sees the value in studying professional games (and it appears than many people do see very high value in this) already understand on some level (perhaps subconsciously) that "holism" in an incredibly important idea in studying go.

When you study a professional game, you are studying many aspects of the game together and in context. You see the corner enclosures, extensions, joseki, and the like in relation to the overall fuseki. You see the tesuji, kos, invasions, capture races, etc. surrounded by the rest of the board. You see the end game moves after seeing how those positions developed in the first place.

Granted, this does not go as far as to include other aspects of study about go such as history of the game, history of the players, social context, and other factors that are not captured in the game records (or commentaries).

Still, if you believe holism to be worth studying, studying professional games (especially well commented ones) is one way of accomplishing holistic study, especially if it is not well address in the English go literature.

I guess it's time for me to order a copy of GoGoD! ;)
RedPoney Carpenter
kgs/igs/ogs/dgs: redponey
igolocal.net
User avatar
jts
Oza
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
Rank: kgs 6k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 632 times

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by jts »

tchan001 wrote:I don't think it is ok for you to tell people in a public forum to download a pdf just because it is available and just because you are unable to read the language. In my opinion, what you have accomplished is promotion of piracy of copyrighted material on a public forum.


Be careful, tchan. This man is a dangerous pirate. If you make him angry, you may end up walking the plank!
User avatar
ez4u
Oza
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
Rank: Jp 6 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: ez4u
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 2351 times
Been thanked: 1332 times

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by ez4u »

tchan001 wrote:My opinion is that you chose to tell people in this forum that you deliberately downloaded a pdf of a copyrighted book mentioned on this thread. That is an act of piracy which you have documented yourself. You justified it as being ok by saying:
ez4u wrote:I was excited to find the copy because I wanted to know whether the material was interesting enough to warrant finding the book without being able to read Chinese (hence potentially helping sales!).

The logic of your statement is that it is ok to download a pirate pdf to see if it is interesting. I am just pointing out a logical extension of your position if someone presented the same type of argument in a different setting.

I don't think it is ok for you to tell people in a public forum to download a pdf just because it is available and just because you are unable to read the language. In my opinion, what you have accomplished is promotion of piracy of copyrighted material on a public forum.

As long as we are clear on who you are speaking for, I am fine. As mentioned, YMMV. But just to make sure I understand your position, I'd like to check. You think it is better that I not try to determine whether the book is worth buying, right? I should just give up and walk away from a potentially interesting and helpful book, right? I checked Amazon first, but it did not have the helpful "look inside" feature (it did not even have the cover photo). I think I get what you consider the wrong course of action (but don't let me put words in your mouth), but what do you consider the right course of action?
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
User avatar
tchan001
Gosei
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:44 pm
GD Posts: 1292
Location: Hong Kong
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 534 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by tchan001 »

The right course of action is to ask to see if someone has a copy and if they would give a review of what the content is. Based on their opinion, you can choose whether to buy it or not (whether it is available is a different concern). If you are able to find it in a bookstore and the bookstore allows you to preview it, that's great as you are able to get even more information about whether you want to buy it or not. If the publisher chooses to provide a preview sample pdf for download, you are of course welcome to do so. If you have friends who are willing to lend you their copy, please enjoy their kindness.

My point is that if you wouldn't tell people to download a pirate version of an English language go book to preview for a possible purchase, why should it be different just because it is in a different language. Perhaps you would though but that's your call, not mine. YMMV.
http://tchan001.wordpress.com
A blog on Asian go books, go sightings, and interesting tidbits
Go is such a beautiful game.
User avatar
gogameguru
Lives in gote
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:18 pm
Rank: 5d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 357 times
Contact:

Re: Research in Go - 2011

Post by gogameguru »

redponey wrote:And now back to one of the more go related topics in this thread ....

It seems to me that anyone who sees the value in studying professional games (and it appears than many people do see very high value in this) already understand on some level (perhaps subconsciously) that "holism" in an incredibly important idea in studying go.

When you study a professional game, you are studying many aspects of the game together and in context. You see the corner enclosures, extensions, joseki, and the like in relation to the overall fuseki. You see the tesuji, kos, invasions, capture races, etc. surrounded by the rest of the board. You see the end game moves after seeing how those positions developed in the first place.

Granted, this does not go as far as to include other aspects of study about go such as history of the game, history of the players, social context, and other factors that are not captured in the game records (or commentaries).

Still, if you believe holism to be worth studying, studying professional games (especially well commented ones) is one way of accomplishing holistic study, especially if it is not well address in the English go literature.

I guess it's time for me to order a copy of GoGoD! ;)


I agree. Replaying pro games and really trying to understand what's going on is one of the most rewarding and also enjoyable ways of studying Go. Playing Go is also an excellent form of study, if you want to look at things that way :). So is reviewing them.

Most of the other stuff, like solving Go problems, is just an effective means to an end. In my opinion, one of the main advantages of solving a lot of problems is that it helps you start to understand more of what's going on in pro games and makes replaying them more fun.

There's a school of thought in music that holds that repetitive technical practise doesn't crush creativity, but frees it. In my experience that's true in Go as well as music and most other things worth doing.
Post Reply