Bill, I agonised over that bulge at . I didn't see your other those large jumps are a blind spot of mine, I rarely consider them. Currently I've noticed myself making this mistake though of leaving a local situation to approach a corner but ending up with a worse result (in my view) than if I play a local move and my opponent closes the corner. One of many things to work on I guess.
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:56 pm
by Bill Spight
Boidhre wrote:Bill, I agonised over that bulge at .
Good. You considered it. That's the most important thing at the kyu level. If you always consider the right play, it is hard not to be SDK, just by the law of averages.
I didn't see your other those large jumps are a blind spot of mine, I rarely consider them.
Think of it as a boshi. Attack!
Currently I've noticed myself making this mistake though of leaving a local situation to approach a corner but ending up with a worse result (in my view) than if I play a local move and my opponent closes the corner. One of many things to work on I guess.
Urgent points before big points.
It's a Zen kind of thing. Beginners often continue playing in a local area after the local temperature has dropped. Then they learn to tenuki. Then they have to learn when not to tenuki, because the local area is urgent. Mountains are again mountains.
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:06 pm
by Boidhre
Most of my issue with those large jumps as attacks is a vicious circle. Because I don't play them often I can't read them quickly compared to moves I'm more familiar with. Because I can't read them out as easily my instincts are to play other moves instead.
I'm trying to combat this by forcing myself to play large knights and similar where I can't clearly see a reason not to (which usually exists, I'm just blind to it). We'll see how this goes.
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:50 am
by Boidhre
Not a loss but my first finished game with long time limits against someone near my strength (EGF wise) since my long absence from the game:
Hi Boidhre, welcome back. This opponent was... not very good.
(;CA[Windows-1252]FF[4]RU[Japanese]OT[50 days with 1 day extra per move]XM[215] AP[SmartGo:2.8.3.0]SZ[19]GM[1]GN[BA]PC[DGS]PB[8k]BR[8k]PW[Pádraig O'Sullivan]WR[10k] KM[6.5]RE[W+Resign]MULTIGOGM[0] ;B[qd];W[dq];B[dd];W[qp];B[kd];W[co];B[pj];W[op]LB[od:a][oc:b][pj:c]C[I'm not so crazy about this move, because you give B the option to take (a) or (b), making (c) a very good stone.] (;B[ck]C[See vars.];W[cf];B[ch];W[cc];B[dc];W[cd];B[ce]C[Bizarre.];W[de];B[be];W[bf] (;B[cb]C[See var.];W[bd];B[cn];W[dn];B[cm];W[ee];B[fc] (;W[gd]C[Maybe too much. See vars.] (;B[gc]C[So soft. See var.];W[hd];B[hc] (;W[od]C[See vars.];B[pf];W[qc] (;B[pd]C[Bad. See var.];W[pc] (;B[rd]C[Bizarre. See var.] (;W[mc]C[See var.];B[fd];W[fe];B[ge]LB[hd:a]C[Now you see the problem with stopping short at (a).] ;W[ql];B[pl];W[pm];B[qk];W[ol] (;B[he]C[Ridiculous. See var.];W[pk] (;B[qj]C[See var.];W[oj];B[nk];W[ok];B[mq];W[nq];B[nr];W[or];B[np];W[oq];B[mp] (;W[iq]C[Nice. See var.];B[gq];W[io];B[eq];W[dp];B[eo];W[do];B[dr];W[cr];B[hr];W[ir] ;B[fr];W[kq];B[is];W[js];B[hs];W[lr];B[mr] (;W[kn]C[Right idea. Feels soft. See var.];B[ip];W[jp];B[hp] (;W[ds]C[Eye on the wrong ball. See var.];B[er] (;W[mm]C[Right idea. See var.];B[lk];W[oi];B[ph];W[kb];B[oe];W[nd];B[rb];W[rc];B[sc] ;W[qb];B[qa];W[ob];B[lm];W[ln];B[jc];W[jb];B[ib];W[bb];B[bg];W[kc];B[bo];W[bp];B[nm] ;W[nl];B[ml];W[mn];B[km];W[jd];B[je];W[mi];B[ho];W[in];B[im];W[hm];B[il] (;W[dj]C[See var.];B[cj];W[dh];B[ci];W[di];B[hn];W[en] (;B[gm]C[Bizarre. See var.];W[hl];B[hk];W[gl];B[gk];W[fl];B[jk];W[gn];B[fp];W[ki] ;B[jh];W[gi];B[hh];W[gh];B[hi];W[fj];B[hg];W[gg];B[fk];W[fm];B[dk];W[kh];B[cg];W[dg] ;B[oh];W[nh];B[ng];W[mg];B[nf];W[ji];B[ij];W[hb];B[ic];W[ia];B[gb];W[pa];B[rk];W[rm] ;B[fo];W[bn];B[bm];W[ao];B[ld];W[jg];B[lc];W[lb];B[fn];W[em];B[rn];W[sm];B[rq];W[rp] ;B[pr];W[os];B[qr];W[rs];B[sr];W[db];B[oo];W[po];B[qn];W[pn];B[jn];W[jo];B[nn];W[lp] ;B[lo];W[mo];B[lq];W[ko];B[rl];W[qm];B[mb];W[nb];B[ha];W[eb];B[kr];W[jr];B[ls];W[pi] ;B[qi];W[am];B[al];W[an];B[bl];W[sl];B[md];W[ma];B[mf];W[sk];B[]C[Result\: W+Resign] ;W[sj]) (;B[gl])) (;W[hl])) (;W[mn])) (;W[mn]C[Finished.])) (;W[lo])) (;W[jq])) (;B[ok])) (;B[pk])) (;W[nc]LB[oe:a][ne:b]C[Now if B (a) you can block at (b).])) (;B[oe];W[nd];B[fd];W[fe];B[ge]LB[hd:a]C[This is why you cannot stop at (a).])) (;B[rc];W[pc];B[rb])) (;W[id]LB[gd:a]C[Once you start with (a), and miraculously B replied, you have to push 1 more.
See also 3rd var.]) (;W[hf]C[Or fix your shape ?])) (;B[bc];W[ae];B[fd];W[fe];B[ge]LB[gd:a]C[B would cut and fight with you.])) (;W[bb]LB[db:a][fd:b]C[Since B missed both local ataris, this is quite nice. If W kills the 1 stone with (a) -- which is already a lot of cash here -- then W (b) is also very nice.
See also 3rd var.]) (;W[od])) (;B[ee]C[Standard.];W[df];B[cb];W[bd];B[bc];W[ae])) (;B[oc]LB[pj:a]C[(a) takes a nice spot. See also 3rd var.]) (;B[jq]LB[cj:a]C[Also bigger than (a) direction.]))
Neither of us in optimal form by a long shot but an interesting game for me nonetheless. (4k? with a big ? by the way, I haven't had a solid KGS rank in well over a year)
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:51 am
by EdLee
Random thoughts.
(;GM[1]FF[4]CA[UTF-8]AP[CGoban:3]ST[2] RU[Japanese]SZ[19]HA[2]KM[0.50] PW[topazg]PB[Boidhre]WR[2k]BR[4k]DT[2014-02-16]PC[KGS]AB[pd][dp]RE[W+15.50] ;W[qo] ;B[de] ;W[qf] ;B[nd] ;W[pj] ;B[op] ;W[pq] ;B[oq] ;W[pr]LB[pp:a]C[My feeling is W (a) instead, but I dunno. ] ;B[jp] ;W[dc] ;B[ec] ;W[eb] ;B[ed] ;W[fc] ;B[fd]LB[db:b][fb:a]C[Dunno.] ;W[gc] ;B[cc] ;W[db] (;B[jc]C[See var.] ;W[cd] ;B[ce] ;W[ck] ;B[cm] ;W[ch] (;B[gd]C[Not sure why you want this exchange, pushing W toward your cash, and there is nothing to build here. See var.] ;W[hc] ;B[dj] ;W[cj] ;B[dh] ;W[di] ;B[ei] ;W[ci] ;B[eh] ;W[dl] (;B[pn]C[If you make this shape, you must expect W to push and cut and fight with you. See var.] ;W[po] ;B[oo] ;W[on] ;B[om] ;W[nn] ;B[mp]LB[pm:a]C[If you have to come back here, then the atari has no meaning, because W can just capture (a), and you get a broken shape.] ;W[pm] ;B[qn]C[Run ?!?!? This entire local sequence is wrong for B.] ;W[pl] ;B[or] ;W[rq] ;B[nm] ;W[mn] ;B[nk]LB[nk:a]C[You have now created a weak group (a).] ;W[dq] ;B[eq] ;W[cp] ;B[do] ;W[er] ;B[dr] ;W[cq] (;B[fq]C[Why ??] ;W[fr] ;B[gr] ;W[cr] (;B[gq]C[See var.] ;W[lo] ;B[lp] ;W[jn] ;B[kl] ;W[co] (;B[em]C[Wrong shape. See var.] ;W[dm]C[See.] ;B[dn] ;W[cn]C[Big local loss.] ;B[lm] ;W[ko] ;B[el] ;W[ni] ;B[oj]LB[ph:a]C[Terrible. What are you doing.
Thanks Ed. Several of those bad moves were of the "thought I saw something working" kind unfortunately.
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:29 pm
by Bill Spight
For extra credit, what is the score?
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:47 pm
by Boidhre
W+14.5? White owes a move inside after Black T19 and dame being filled. I think the black group on top is ok.
I've a feeling from your choice of smilie that I'm missing something huge here.
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:36 pm
by Bill Spight
Boidhre wrote:W+14.5? White owes a move inside after Black T19 and dame being filled. I think the black group on top is ok.
I've a feeling from your choice of smilie that I'm missing something huge here.
Right. White has to protect.
I was just surprised that you both missed that.
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:37 pm
by Boidhre
Bill Spight wrote:
Boidhre wrote:W+14.5? White owes a move inside after Black T19 and dame being filled. I think the black group on top is ok.
I've a feeling from your choice of smilie that I'm missing something huge here.
Right. White has to protect.
I was just surprised that you both missed that.
Someone's wife was annoyed with someone playing go so the very late yose was rather rushed.
Re: A beginner's journal of little interest
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:33 pm
by Boidhre
So I've neglected this journal and go almost totally over the last year. This was primarily due to ill-health, I've been depressed, manic and mixed most of the last 12 months and whatever sleep disorder I have has worsened considerably and my sleep became free running (as in going around the clock, almost always in the same direction) on top of the sleep disruption from the bipolar. I'm getting the sleep disorder looked at in my country's only sleep clinic that handles non-aponea cases, which means journeying to Dublin constantly. Also as an added (but welcome) stressor my wife got a Post-Doctorate position, the problem is that it's a 3 hour commute away and this means several days of the week I've sole care of the children (who are school/preschool age). The care bit is fine, the having to be fully alert and awake for certain at particular times of the day doesn't mix well with the free running sleep so that means 1-2 hours or no sleep many nights which of course aggravates the bipolar that isn't fully controlled because I'm not that responsive to medication.
I was amused when my psychiatrist said to me that she hoped I had sleep aponea (I'm a candidate for it due to a narrow airway though it wouldn't cause free running sleep) because that at least is something they could treat and somewhere they could pretty much guarantee me an improvement in quality of life. It's not a good sign when your doctors are wishing conditions on you!
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 12:24 am
by EdLee
Hi Boidhre, post-doc in which field ?
Re:
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:54 am
by Boidhre
EdLee wrote:Hi Boidhre, post-doc in which field ?
PM sent. Tiny world, she wouldn't like me talking about it publicly.