Page 7 of 8
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:00 pm
by Simba
$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
If this stone on F3 magically comes back to life, I could be in a lot of trouble with a weak group on both sides. This move removes a lot of the aji of this stone. If black gets to extend it to F4 himself, I'm in a lot of trouble. I looked at other ways of blocking for example playing on F5, but then black can escape via G4 and it's not great since both my white groups would be weak... I've also worked out (I think!) that if black extends to D14, I win the semeai, so not worried about that
.
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:13 pm
by Jordus
$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Ok... wasn't expecting his move there... a little too precautionary I think.. So I will take a big point on the board then... this leaves miai for me at a and b
$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:19 pm
by EdLee
seems wrong direction, not urgent, since
is already settled;
seems big, aiming at the weakness at (a):
$$B
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$B
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:26 pm
by EdLee
Jordus wrote: this leaves miai for me at a and b
(a) and (b) are not miai, because (b) is a very big shared point --
it has to do with the weakness of the
group:
$$Bm27
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bm27 For example, if W gets
, W takes care of
,
and the
exchange is clearly good for W:
$$W
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$W
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:05 pm
by Simba
$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:08 pm
by Jordus
$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:41 pm
by Simba
$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:35 pm
by Aphelion
$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm27 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0What?! You cannot do this. You absolutely absolutely cannot do this. You MUST CUT here. If you were going to give up that original approach that easily here, you should have just played at D11 in the first place and the corner would still have been open.
Abandoning a stone like the way White has done with C14 is completely not acceptable. If you played it, you can't even begin to consider losing it without getting value out of it. Cowardice is the sure path to a loss.
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:39 pm
by Aphelion
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 7:19 pm
by Jordus
$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 7:56 pm
by Jordus
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:17 pm
by Aphelion
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:29 pm
by Simba
$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Sigh, I wish I'd played G16 instead of K15... Should've listened to my instinct... Disappointed, how frustrating
. I've spent about 90 minutes reading this move out, and at best I get a pretty crappy result... But none of the alternatives look any good either... Annoying.
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:47 pm
by Jordus
$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
I see two moves for white will probably make right now... They will protect around (a) or extend (b)
if they protect at (a), I have the option to play at (b), (c), or (d)... My most likely (c) or (d) would be my choices to play...
if they extend at (b), I suppose extending at (e) would be best...
$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm37 Prisoner Count: B-0 W-0
Re: Malkovich 113- Jordus v. Simba
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:50 pm
by Redundant
Aphelion wrote: For Jordus after game
.
seems wrong direction, not urgent, since 
is already settled;
seems big, aiming at the weakness at (a):
group:
, W takes care of 
exchange is clearly good for W:
. I've spent about 90 minutes reading this move out, and at best I get a pretty crappy result... But none of the alternatives look any good either... Annoying.