Page 1 of 1

Introduction of an new online Go website

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:02 am
by tianzuo
hi,guys,I would like to introduce an new online Go website--NSG, it's so amazing!

Unique features of No Strive Go( http://www.wuzheng.org):

Online Go playing, with absoluately no time limit!
Simply with a web browswer, you can play online Go games. There is no installation of any software. You can play games even with your smart phones.
Every game is recorded permanently and has an unique URL address
Every player has his/her own NSG homepage

With No Strive Go, playing Go is no longer competitive. With No Strive Go, you can always try your 'ear reddening moves'.

NoStrive is a webpage game; which means that it can play on any platform, such as iPad, mac, linux... and most of mobile.

link: http://www.wuzheng.org

p.s:
The address of nostrive has been moved to http://www.wuzheng.org since March, this year.

Re: introduce of an new online Go website

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:25 am
by LovroKlc
And I suppose it is particularly useful for EGF members - thats why it has been post on EGF forums :)

Re: introduce of an new online Go website

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:20 am
by Tryphon
tianzuo wrote:hi,gays,


the first community based go server :)

Re: introduce of an new online Go website

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 4:45 am
by kirkmc
Who came up with the idea of photo backgrounds on the goban? That is simply horrendous.

Re: introduce of an new online Go website

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:24 am
by DrStraw
kirkmc wrote:Who came up with the idea of photo backgrounds on the goban? That is simply horrendous.


Agreed. That is the ugliest board I have ever seen on an online site.

Re: introduce of an new online Go website

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:40 am
by daal
tianzuo wrote:hi,gays
The word I think you are looking for is "guys." "Gays" means homosexuals. That's not what you meant, is it? ;-)
tianzuo wrote:With No Strive Go, playing Go is no longer competitive.
This does not make sense. A game that both players are trying to win is always "competitive." Do you mean that there is no ranking?

kirkmc wrote:Who came up with the idea of photo backgrounds on the goban? That is simply horrendous.
Wow, for once I almost have to agree with Kirk. :shock: While I wouldn't call the nice picture horrendous, it is such a distraction that I would not play on the site without the option to use a more neutral skin.

edit: There is an option. The picture can be replaced with a wooden or blank background (among others).

Re: introduce of an new online Go website

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:52 am
by kirkmc
Yes, I saw that there's an option, but the idea of having pictures on a goban is just so odd in the first place.

Re: introduce of an new online Go website

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 7:53 am
by tianzuo
yes, it should be "guys", what a big mistake...
daal wrote:
tianzuo wrote:hi,gays
The word I think you are looking for is "guys." "Gays" means homosexuals. That's not what you meant, is it? ;-)
tianzuo wrote:With No Strive Go, playing Go is no longer competitive.
This does not make sense. A game that both players are trying to win is always "competitive." Do you mean that there is no ranking?

kirkmc wrote:Who came up with the idea of photo backgrounds on the goban? That is simply horrendous.
Wow, for once I almost have to agree with Kirk. :shock: While I wouldn't call the nice picture horrendous, it is such a distraction that I would not play on the site without the option to use a more neutral skin.

edit: There is an option. The picture can be replaced with a wooden or blank background (among others).

Re: Introduction of an new online Go website

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:27 am
by Joaz Banbeck
[admin]

I moved the thread to a more appropriate forum.

[/admin]

Re: Introduction of an new online Go website

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:01 pm
by palapiku
I like the background picture! Though I'd agree that it shouldn't be the default.

Re: Introduction of an new online Go website

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:12 pm
by tianzuo
IgoLocal is very interesting!

palapiku wrote:I like the background picture! Though I'd agree that it shouldn't be the default.