It is currently Wed Aug 12, 2020 1:53 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF Rating System Commission Report 2020
Post #21 Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 8:01 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 291
Liked others: 123
Was liked: 84
Rank: EGF 3d
KGS: gennan
Tygem: gennan
OGS: gennan
Kaya handle: gennan
An upper limit to grades was not discussed in the commission, but the new formulae imply an upper limit of 13d/21p EGF, assumed (roughly) to correspond to perfect play. A theoretical entity of this level would be able to give 5 or 6 stones handicap to a top European player (~8d/4p EGF) and 3 or 4 stones handicap to a World champion (~10d/11p EGF). With this assumption, top AI level is assumed to be about 12d/18p EGF.


This post by gennan was liked by: betterlife
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF Rating System Commission Report 2020
Post #22 Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 8:28 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 37
Location: Bremen/Germany
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 4
Rank: EGF 2 kyu
KGS: Oberlappen 2k
I think there should be also thought making a new rating class, for tournaments with top players. The class A to C is not bad for normal tournaments I think (I don´t mention class D cause it´s only online), but in my opinion the system should be completed, wit han class S (for Special) or however someone would call.
We have some tournaments for top players, with way more time per move, then in average tournaments. The typical class A tournament, got 1 hour + canadian Byo Yomi (for example the typical 15 stones in 5 minutes), but there tournaments way more time to think, 90 min. + Byo Yomi or even two hours + Byo Yomi and in some even the Byo Yomi got a quite exceeded time, compared to other tournaments.
When we see top players, we can see that it´s quite a difference there, if they play just 1 hour with Byo Yomi or 90 min + Yomi or even more. In the longer games the stronger player reigns more suprior. In the more average timed tournaments, the outsiders do more often beat the favourites on high Dan levels, then in games with more time.

So it does matter for really strong players, if they have jsut the normal class A tournament time or the much bigger time from a Championship. Here really shines the strength of the good players and the outsiders has to do more, to get the win, cause the favourite here can mobilize more ressources with more time. I think an class S rating should be establieshed with tournaments who have at least 90 min and + can. Byo Yomi 15 stones in 5 min. (or the fitting pendant in the Fischer Time). Class S should then count 125% on the rating, instead of the 100% from class A tournament I suppose.
In the end, I think this would be a good solution. And it would be nearly exclusive for top players (only exception is the EGC, where more players got so much time).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF Rating System Commission Report 2020
Post #23 Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 9:01 am 
Dies in gote
User avatar

Posts: 56
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Liked others: 155
Was liked: 14
Rank: EGF 1 Dan
Universal go server handle: betterlife
gennan wrote:
An upper limit to grades was not discussed in the commission, but the new formulae imply an upper limit of 13d/21p EGF, assumed (roughly) to correspond to perfect play. A theoretical entity of this level would be able to give 5 or 6 stones handicap to a top European player (~8d/4p EGF) and 3 or 4 stones handicap to a World champion (~10d/11p EGF). With this assumption, top AI level is assumed to be about 12d/18p EGF.

Nice so we should extend to 12d if the robots are allowed to join!! Currently the strongest amateur player rank is 8d. The system can handle 9d but it's accutally not correctly implemented so atm an 9d would be downgraded to 8d by an egd rating manager.
If a player is entered as new then he gets these initial ratings:
Code:
5d   2500
6d   2600
7d   2700
8d   2800
9d   2670 <= this seems wrong
1p   2700
2p   2730
3p   2760
4p   2790
5p   2820
6p   2850
7p   2880
8p   2910
9p   2940

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF Rating System Commission Report 2020
Post #24 Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 4:04 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 291
Liked others: 123
Was liked: 84
Rank: EGF 3d
KGS: gennan
Tygem: gennan
OGS: gennan
Kaya handle: gennan
It does seem reasonable to me to have 8d as the maximum Entry Grade for human amateur newcomers to the rating system.

Perhaps it should even be 7d? Most of the current players with ratings around 2800 have started at an Entry Grade of 7d and worked their way up by winning a lot of games against other top players. 8d is not an amateur grade that is easily aquired in China or Korea (I think you need to be something like top 5 amateur nation wide, which is quite formidable). Only in Japan it seems to occur more frequently, but Japanese dan grades are significantly weaker than EGF dan grades. 8d in Japan could be anything from 5d EGF to 7d EGF.

So I think it should not even be possible to accept 9d amateur as a first Entry Grade. It should only apply to human amateurs that can consistently beat quite strong pros (around 8p or somewhere between #200 and #400 on https://www.goratings.org/en/?). I don't know if such amateurs really exist. Does any of you know a name of such a player, who is still alive and actively playing in tournaments? I think he would be pretty famous (like Nie Wei Ping around 1981). In the exceedingly rare case where such an amateur player participates in an EGF tournament, it would justify manual intervention by the EGD manager to set his first Entry Grade to 9d amateur.

For pros it is a different matter. I think they should just declare their official pro Grade and the rating system should initialize their rating to the EGF rating corresponding to that pro Grade, like @betterlife's list (which is already the case, I think).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF Rating System Commission Report 2020
Post #25 Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:46 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 1312
Liked others: 108
Was liked: 272
At the minute, professional players have their rating reset when they are promoted. Resets seem very desirable for improving players, but I don't immediately see why they are wanted for professional players. Is there any plan to change this part of the system?

_________________
North Lecale

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF Rating System Commission Report 2020
Post #26 Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:05 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 291
Liked others: 123
Was liked: 84
Rank: EGF 3d
KGS: gennan
Tygem: gennan
OGS: gennan
Kaya handle: gennan
This was not discussed in the commission, but pro grades are not earned lightly, so personally I feel that resetting seems quite harmless to do in the few cases where the EGF rating is not quite as high as the corresponding pro grade rating. In fact, resetting for professional grade promotions may even be considered a good opportunity to calibrate top EGF ratings.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group