Page 1 of 2

A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2023 8:30 am
by Gérard TAILLE
After a lot of work I managed to build a position for which the win need a special strategy I have never seen before.
Can you solve the following problem:

AGA rules, komi 14.5
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black to play and win
$$ ------------------------
$$| . . . . O X O O O . X |
$$| O O O O O X O O O X X |
$$| X X X X X X X X O . X |
$$| . . . . . X X O . O O |
$$| . . . . . . X O O O O |
$$| . X . . . . X X X X X |
$$| X X X . . . X O O O O |
$$| O O X . . . X O . O . |
$$| . O X X X X X O O X O |
$$| X O O O O X O O X X X |
$$| . X X . O X O X . X . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]
Edit :look at https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?p=279399#p279399 for a far better problem.

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2023 4:41 pm
by hzamir
Gérard TAILLE wrote:AGA rules, komi 14.5
May I ask the point of setting Komi to 14.5? Is it just to to ensure that a win vs loss depends on the solution?

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2023 6:08 pm
by dany
It's funny. Another superko beast.

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2023 6:07 am
by Gérard TAILLE
hzamir wrote:
Gérard TAILLE wrote:AGA rules, komi 14.5
May I ask the point of setting Komi to 14.5? Is it just to to ensure that a win vs loss depends on the solution?
Basically the komi is here to help you. If black plays the correct sequence black will win, otherwise black will lose.
I could have only said "what is the best result for black" but in that case you have no clue to know if you are close to the solution.

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:25 am
by Gérard TAILLE
dany wrote:It's funny. Another superko beast.
Yes Dany it is a really a beast.
Assuming white is allowed to play "unuseful" moves (e.g. by using the double ko when it is not necessary) but is not allowed to play "bad" moves (a move which loses points), how many moves are necessary before black can make the decisive capture (I mean a capture which is not an exchange in the double ko in the bottom right corner or in the sending 2 return 1 sequence)?

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2023 2:16 pm
by Gérard TAILLE
I have just discovered a dual solution for the problem I showed in this topic. By just adding a black stone and a white stone in the upper left corner this dual issue is fixed:

AGA rules, komi 14.5
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black to play and win
$$ ------------------------
$$| X . O . O X O O O . X |
$$| O O O O O X O O O X X |
$$| X X X X X X X X O . X |
$$| . . . . . X X O . O O |
$$| . . . . . . X O O O O |
$$| . X . . . . X X X X X |
$$| X X X . . . X O O O O |
$$| O O X . . . X O . O . |
$$| . O X X X X X O O X O |
$$| X O O O O X O O X X X |
$$| . X X . O X O X . X . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:36 am
by Gérard TAILLE
After more work I have discovered the black attack is far stronger than what I believed initialy. As a consequence the win for black in my previous positions is not very interesting because almost any black moves (including a pass!) is winning.
Though the results I claimed are good it is not satisfactory and I have to change the position in order to have a quite interesting solution. Here it is with a more usual komi:

AGA rules, komi 6.5
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black to play and win
$$ ------------------------
$$| . O . O . O . O . O . |
$$| O O O O O O O O O O X |
$$| X X X X X X O . O . . |
$$| . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$| . . . . . . X O O O O |
$$| . X . . . . X X X X X |
$$| X X X . . . X O O O O |
$$| O O X . . . X O . O . |
$$| . O X X X X X O O X O |
$$| X O O O O X O O X X X |
$$| . X X . O X O X . X . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]
This time I am quite happy. The position seems quite simple, without weaknesses (with japanese rules it is even an endgame position) but with AGA rules, this apparently losing position is a winning one due to a very surprising sequence!
Take pleasure.

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:45 pm
by RobertJasiek
Gérard TAILLE wrote:endgame position
I think you mean "settled position".

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:56 pm
by sorin
Gérard TAILLE wrote: Black to play and win
I must be missing something, what is the number of prisoners on each side?
At first sight, assumming no prisoners, black has 22 points, white has 14, so with komi 6.5 black won already.

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 3:04 am
by Gérard TAILLE
RobertJasiek wrote:
Gérard TAILLE wrote:endgame position
I think you mean "settled position".
Yes Robert. I mean it is a position for which both players can easily decide to pass and go in the confirmation phase instead of playing the loop made of a single pass followed by an exchange in the double ko.

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 3:22 am
by Gérard TAILLE
sorin wrote:
Gérard TAILLE wrote: Black to play and win
I must be missing something, what is the number of prisoners on each side?
At first sight, assumming no prisoners, black has 22 points, white has 14, so with komi 6.5 black won already.
I assume AGA rules that means area counting. The number of prisoners is irrelevant.

As an example if
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B :b3: pass, :b5: pass, :w6: pass
$$ ------------------------
$$| . O . O . O . O . O 4 |
$$| O O O O O O O O O O X |
$$| X X X X X X O . O . 2 |
$$| . . . . . X X O . O . |
$$| . . . . . . X O O O O |
$$| . X . . . . X X X X X |
$$| X X X . . . X O O O O |
$$| O O X . . . X O . O . |
$$| . O X X X X X O O X O |
$$| X O O O O X O O X X X |
$$| 1 X X . O X O X . X . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]
black count : 38 stones + 24 territory = 62 points
white count : 45 stones + 12 territory = 57 points
with a 6.5 komi black loses the game by 1.5 points

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 12:51 pm
by jmeinh
If I'm right with my solution idea, it's a pretty nasty superko beast. A kind of "pass fight", and at the same time an example of the difference between situational superko and positional superko, isn't it?
And I think maaany moves are necessary before black can make the decisive capture...

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 1:22 pm
by Gérard TAILLE
jmeinh wrote:If I'm right with my solution idea, it's a pretty nasty superko beast. A kind of "pass fight", and at the same time an example of the difference between situational superko and positional superko, isn't it?
And I think maaany moves are necessary before black can make the decisive capture...
You are 100% right jmeinh.
Do you think you have discovered the right sequence allowing to apply your idea?

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:41 pm
by jmeinh
Well, I think so.
I'm not good at creating images, so I use coordinates.
B A3, W A1, B L4, W J1, B A2.
Now White has a choice:
a. W pass, B A3 , and W A1 is forbidden.
b. W L9 (or elsewhere), B A3 (repeating the loop until W cannot make a move without damaging himself).
c. W L3, B H1 (SSK allows this, in contrast to PSK), W L9 or elsewhere (SSK forbids passing - is that right? I'm not an SSK expert...), B A3 and the same idea as b.

Re: A special (new?) strategy in AGA field?

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 3:27 pm
by Gérard TAILLE
jmeinh wrote:Well, I think so.
I'm not good at creating images, so I use coordinates.
B A3, W A1, B L4, W J1, B A2.
Now White has a choice:
a. W pass, B A3 , and W A1 is forbidden.
b. W L9 (or elsewhere), B A3 (repeating the loop until W cannot make a move without damaging himself).
c. W L3, B H1 (SSK allows this, in contrast to PSK), W L9 or elsewhere (SSK forbids passing - is that right? I'm not an SSK expert...), B A3 and the same idea as b.
The basic idea is correct and I confirm the SSK allows such sequence. Congratulation for that ajmeinh.
Unfortunetly the execution is not correct.
You forgot to take into account the white attack against the black center group.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------------------
$$| . O . O . O . O . O . |
$$| O O O O O O O O O O X |
$$| X X X X X X O . O . . |
$$| W W W W W X X O . O . |
$$| . W . . . W X O O O O |
$$| W X W . . W X X X X X |
$$| X X X W . W X O O O O |
$$| O O X W W W X O . O . |
$$| . O X X X X X O O X O |
$$| X O O O O X O O X X X |
$$| . X X . O X O X . X . |
$$ -----------------------[/go]
In my mind this attack is the main difficulty of this problem.