Life In 19x19

Life in 19x19. Go, Weiqi, Baduk... Thats the life.
https://lifein19x19.com/

Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?t=4360

Page 1 of 1

Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:56 am
by Inkwolf
I played a game against a stronger player, who for some reason is ranked below me and got a two-stone handicap. I played a low knight's approach for my second stone. (It's a move I like and use a lot.)

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c The opening as it happened
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Ended up like this, which I though was a reasonable result, though hardly fabulous:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . X . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Sadly I never got to pincer them on the lower side because their next stone was at R3 and by the time I killed their corner invasion they had a stronger group along the bottom. This is the second game I've played with this opponent, and in both games I was slaughtered.

In review, they said I ought to have played the 3-3 point instead and taken the corner.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c 3-3 point???
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


While it would possibly have got me the second corner, it seems to me that the very best I could have hoped for from it was to get a tiny bit of territory sealed off by a heavy black wall, and been worse off than when I started everywhere else, having only one stone on the entire playable area of the board with black being in control everywhere else.


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Looks pretty grim to me.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Last night I didn't feel up to arguing with someone who clobbered me by 40+ points, though (60+ the last time we played.)

What do you think was the better opening?

Do you have any suggestions for better moves than either?

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:06 am
by lorill
Inkwolf wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . X . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]



Huh ? What was this circled move ?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c 3-3 point???
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Now that's just silly. Please don't listen to this player, and don't take 10pts of territory so early while black gets so much outside influence.

Your ideas were better.

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:17 am
by amnal

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . X . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . W a . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Sadly I never got to pincer them on the lower side because their next stone was at R3 and by the time I killed their corner invasion they had a stronger group along the bottom. This is the second game I've played with this opponent, and in both games I was slaughtered.


Two things to say about this position. Both are local problems, but taken together these kinds of move will make your overall opening terrible:
1) The black circled move is unusual. This is because it's quite bad; it doesn't claim more territory than before, it doesn't extend in any direction, it doesn't attack white. It seems you played the star point on the side, but this seems wrong as it ignores black's bad play - now black can hane at either end of your two stones and leave you with bad shape. Consider instead the point I labelled 'a', which increases white's liberties, makes white a strong wall with no defects, and threatens to seal black into the corner.
2) The white circled move seems submissive; it is a contact move so it will make bother players locally stronger, but you are already locally strong so it isn't obvious that you want to do this. Instead you want to stay strong whilst making black weaker. To this end, you can play (for instance) a to keep the corner strong but without making black stronger (though this is still submissive and not normal), b (most normal) to sit back and see what black does - black can't take both the corner and side without you getting the other easily, or some kind of pincer.



In review, they said I ought to have played the 3-3 point instead and taken the corner.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c 3-3 point???
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


While it would possibly have got me the second corner, it seems to me that the very best I could have hoped for from it was to get a tiny bit of territory sealed off by a heavy white wall, and been worse off than when I started everywhere else, having only one stone on the entire playable area of the board with black being in control everywhere else.


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Looks pretty grim to me.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . B a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Last night I didn't feel up to arguing with someone who clobbered me by 40+ points, though (60+ the last time we played.)

What do you think was the better opening?

Do you have any suggestions for better moves than either?


You are correct; the 3-3 invasion here is very bad. Black's wall is far greater than he would be allowed in any normal joseki, because it's so big that white cannot neutralise it even with another move on the bottom.

Usually we reserve the 3-3 invasion for when black already has stones nearby. This aims to either make black overconcentrated (if those stones are too near black's wall), or possibly to leave black a perfectly reasonable position that you plan to reduce instead of invading.

Overall, the only problems with the diagrams you posted are those which I noted above, both local mistakes. Your loss has almost nothing to do with this, but if you post the rest of the game I or someone else can show you what the problem really was.


Finally, in your final diagram the circled black stone is bad unless black has some stones protecting the cut at a. In the diagram, you can cut at a straight away to punish black for this mistake. I won't show the expected sequences unless you want to know something specific about them.

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:26 am
by hyperpape
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Looks pretty grim to me too.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


There's not any real question that the 3-3 point invasion is bad here. The first thing a player should learn about the 3-3 invasion is that it is normally far worse for the player invading--it is a special purpose move.

But this is the normal variation. Black has fewer cutting points and more influence towards the bottom.

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:32 am
by Inkwolf
lorill wrote:
Huh ? What was this circled move ?


He kicked at R15, I extended, and he connected in the notorious empty triangle. ^^

Thanks!

Amnal, thanks for the tips. You have given me new ideas to think about, and I will try to remember them the next time i play.

No point in posting the file, really. I got caught up in localized fighting trying to defend my side while Black put dots all over the board. I didn't have a single stone west of the center line until Move 89. It's a wonder I didn't lose by more.

Hyperpape, thanks. Glad everyone agrees the early 3-3 invasion was a stupid idea.

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:34 am
by Sevis
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 I'm guessing this is what happened:
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . 8 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4 a . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . b . . . . . , . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . 0 . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:b6: is no good at all -- if black wanted to strengthen the position, a is better, but it's not necessary. In fact :b4: is already not very good, and you should be happy your opponent played it.

I would play :w7: either low or closer to the two stones.

The :w9: :b10: exchange (I'm guessing that's how it happened: I see no other way for the position to have occurred) is weird. I would not play either of the moves: :w9: is small (consider b instead, or approaching another corner), but :b10: is like ignoring a shoulder hit: you can now play under the stone, and black is not comfortable at all.

I think that your main problems are not in the opening, though -- post some later parts of the game.

And, as has been said before, the 3-3 is just plain silly.

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:30 am
by EdLee
hyperpape wrote:Black has fewer cutting points
Yes. In fact, B has zero cutting points: :)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W :w11: fills at :b2:, :b12: at (a)
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X 0 4 . .
$$ | . O X 3 7 8 .
$$ | . O X 1 2 9 a
$$ | . . O X 5 . .
$$ | . . O X 6 X .
$$ | . . O O X . .
$$ | . . . . . . .
$$ ---------------[/go]

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:34 am
by emeraldemon
I think there's a moral to this story: opening is not losing you games. Fighting is. Get stronger at fighting :batman:

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:31 am
by Inkwolf
Sevis wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 I'm guessing this is what happened:
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . 8 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4 a . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . b . . . . . , . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . 0 . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:b6: is no good at all -- if black wanted to strengthen the position, a is better, but it's not necessary. In fact :b4: is already not very good, and you should be happy your opponent played it.

I would play :w7: either low or closer to the two stones.

The :w9: :b10: exchange (I'm guessing that's how it happened: I see no other way for the position to have occurred) is weird.


Whoops, I made a mistake posting....I thought he played Q15, but he didn't until later, when it made more sense. Still, that actually does come up in games at my level, so thank you all for the advice on it. This is the actual order of moves.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . 6 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 a . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . b . . . . . , . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . 8 . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . 0 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I'd really, really rather not post the full sgf.

Thanks again for all the comments.

B probably would have been better to play than 9, or maybe Q 3, 5 or 6.

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:41 pm
by Dusk Eagle
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . b . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . 6 . . . a . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . 8 . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . c 9 . . 0 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

:b4: is bad - this result favors white, and the corner is still open.

:w5: is the proper response :).

:b6: should be at 'a' or 'b'.

:b8: should normally be played at :w9: if he's going to approach this corner.

:w9: is no good - hitting at the diagonal point *below* an opponent's stone is called an armpit hit, and is a move you should avoid (until you know when not to avoid it ;)). Note that it's actually bad for the same reason as :b4: - it induces your opponent to get stronger without real reason. If you rearrange :w5: and :w3: you can see the similarities.

:b10: at 'c' would be the usual response, and certainly better than the 3-3. This :b10: makes me wonder if black knows what he's even going for in the area. If you block at R4 you should get a good result.

Overall, I think white is playing quite a bit better than black so far in this opening. Your problems definitely came later in the game.

And, like others have said, taking the 3-3 point under a lone 4-4 stone at that point in the game is bogus advice. That move is generally reserved for when black's influence would be mostly useless on both sides, or when black is so powerful in the area that normally better moves are too difficult to pull off.

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:56 pm
by Inkwolf
Thanks, DE, for the advice about 9, I will watch that sort of thing more carefully.

Dusk Eagle wrote:If you block at R4 you should get a good result.


Unfortunately, I blocked in the wrong direction, at Q3. He played R4, I blocked at R5 and he crosscut me and before I knew it, I was focusing more on fighting him than on making good moves or territory. I got the right edge for about 4-5 lines in, part of the bottom, and a little chunk of the top, but nothing but tentacles through the middle and a failed corner invasion on the left.

Bah. I have to catch this guy sometime when I'm not playing like an idiot.

Re: Opening against handicap: what's your opinion?

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:56 pm
by Dusk Eagle
Inkwolf wrote:...I was focusing more on fighting him than on making good moves or territory.

Fighting is fine, and there are plenty of good moves to be made and lots of territory to be earned while doing so. One of your goals in a fight should be, "How can I profit from this?", though doing so can require some skill. Still though, R4 is definitely the way to block - after R4 Q3 P3, your :w9: suddenly appears to help your group a lot, no? Also, look at the wall you build toward your position on the right.
All times are UTC-07:00
Page 1 of 1

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited