Page 1 of 1
Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:31 pm
by tezza
Hi,
Kageyama wrote that, in his experience, a player faces four barriers at: 12-
13k,
8-9k, 4-
5k, and
1-
2k.
The ‘barrier’ levels seem to imprefectly relate to the Fibonacci sequence:
1, 1,
2, 3,
5,
8,
13.
What do you all think? (an idle weekend thought
).
Cheers
tezza
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:05 pm
by Joaz Banbeck
I'm sure that you have a great future ahead of you in phrenology or alchemy.
Or maybe selling derivatives.
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:20 pm
by Bill Spight
tezza wrote:Hi,
Kageyama wrote that, in his experience, a player faces four barriers at: 12-
13k,
8-9k, 4-
5k, and
1-
2k.
The ‘barrier’ levels seem to imprefectly relate to the Fibonacci sequence:
1, 1,
2, 3,
5,
8,
13.
What do you all think? (an idle weekend thought
).
Cheers
tezza
I think that, on this topic, Kageyama was full of it. The only barriers are in your mind.
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:47 pm
by ACGalaga
Heh heh
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:28 pm
by tezza
Joaz Banbeck wrote:Or maybe selling derivatives.
heh heh
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:38 am
by daniel_the_smith
He got it wrong. Actually they're at 3d, 1k, 4k, 15k, and--rumor has it--at 92k.
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:20 am
by EdLee
tezza wrote:12-13k, 8-9k, 4-5k, and 1-2k
imprefectly... Fibonacci 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13
Oh my gosh, tezza, you're right! Note how they also imperfectly fit into:
Natural numbers:
1,
2, 3,
4,
5, 6, 7,
8,
9, 10, 11,
12,
13Primes:
2, 3,
5, 7, 11,
13pi: 3.
1415926
53
5897
9...
sqrt(
2):
1.
414213
56
2... (
80% of the first
10 digits! Wow!)
e:
2.7
182818284590
4523
5360
287
47
13
526...
Incredible & amazing! And what Joaz said.
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:33 am
by wessanenoctupus
be nice now
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:23 pm
by hailthorn011
daniel_the_smith wrote:He got it wrong. Actually they're at 3d, 1k, 4k, 15k, and--rumor has it--at 92k.
Wow, if someone's 92k, they must not even know how to put the stones on the board. <<
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:33 pm
by jts
daniel_the_smith wrote:He got it wrong. Actually they're at 3d, 1k, 4k, 15k, and--rumor has it--at 92k.
You know, it's funny, I had no idea what this was supposed to mean, because they have a sort of rhythm in my head, like a telephone number.
One four
one five
nine is a single discrete chunk, and then two-six-five is the next... nine-two just doesn't compute!
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:55 am
by Dusk Eagle
Reminds me of this
:
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:01 am
by Sverre
jts wrote:daniel_the_smith wrote:He got it wrong. Actually they're at 3d, 1k, 4k, 15k, and--rumor has it--at 92k.
You know, it's funny, I had no idea what this was supposed to mean, because they have a sort of rhythm in my head, like a telephone number.
One four
one five
nine is a single discrete chunk, and then two-six-five is the next... nine-two just doesn't compute!
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:04 am
by daniel_the_smith
jts wrote:daniel_the_smith wrote:He got it wrong. Actually they're at 3d, 1k, 4k, 15k, and--rumor has it--at 92k.
You know, it's funny, I had no idea what this was supposed to mean, because they have a sort of rhythm in my head, like a telephone number.
One four
one five
nine is a single discrete chunk, and then two-six-five is the next... nine-two just doesn't compute!
Same here, 14159 and 26583 are distinct chunks in my mind... It was kinda difficult to split them up, I had to check like a dozen times that I'd done it right.
Re: Fibonacci in Kageyamaâs four rank barriers?
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:12 am
by daniel_the_smith
Actually, I think the correct barriers are at:
4d, 3k, 5k, and 8k
hint: