White is at loss for a reply
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 5:34 am
Cutting on the outside with White 2 is reckless. White is at loss for a reply when Black pushes out at 5, and if he plays 4 at 'a', then his position collapses after Black 5, White 'b', Black 4. This is good for Black without question.
(Lessons in the Fundamentals of Go; Toshiro Kageyama 7-Dan)
This may be good for Black without question for Toshiro Kageyama, whereas for me there is a small question.
Why is White at loss for a reply?
What is going to happen if White simply captures Black's stone?
Thanks.
(Lessons in the Fundamentals of Go; Toshiro Kageyama 7-Dan)
This may be good for Black without question for Toshiro Kageyama, whereas for me there is a small question.
Why is White at loss for a reply?
What is going to happen if White simply captures Black's stone?
Thanks.