Page 1 of 1
Cool Rule Set
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:43 pm
by Garuseimasahi
One simple additional rule: Every move must be
more than 3 spaces away from the last. Try it out.

Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:57 pm
by Joaz Banbeck
From your own last move, or the opponent's?
Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:31 am
by phrax
Pfft. 3 spaces. A player may not play consecutive moves on the same side of the board.

Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:46 pm
by Faro
phrax wrote:Pfft. 3 spaces. A player may not play consecutive moves on the same side of the board.

2 separate boards. players must respond to moves played on the other board. For example, B1 on board 1, W2 must reply on board 1, then B3 must be played on board 2, white replys on board 2 and black plays on board 3. And so-on. winner is the one with the most territory between the 2 boards, and captures are shared between boards.
Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:13 pm
by TheBigH
Faro wrote:phrax wrote:Pfft. 3 spaces. A player may not play consecutive moves on the same side of the board.

2 separate boards. players must respond to moves played on the other board. For example, B1 on board 1, W2 must reply on board 1, then B3 must be played on board 2, white replys on board 2 and black plays on board 3. And so-on. winner is the one with the most territory between the 2 boards, and captures are shared between boards.
That's just playing two different games, isn't it?
Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:10 am
by Faro
TheBigH wrote:Faro wrote:phrax wrote:Pfft. 3 spaces. A player may not play consecutive moves on the same side of the board.

2 separate boards. players must respond to moves played on the other board. For example, B1 on board 1, W2 must reply on board 1, then B3 must be played on board 2, white replys on board 2 and black plays on board 3. And so-on. winner is the one with the most territory between the 2 boards, and captures are shared between boards.
That's just playing two different games, isn't it?
Yeah....It sounded more complex in my head

Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:41 pm
by speedchase
what if you can't have a stone on a spot if your opponent has a stone in the same place on the other board?
Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:55 pm
by Faro
speedchase wrote:what if you can't have a stone on a spot if your opponent has a stone in the same place on the other board?
Yeah that was sorta my original idea. the idea being if you put the 2 boards together, you would have the real game. But you split them up and then score them that way, as 2 separate games. I don't know how much sense this makes to anyone but me.
Re: Cool Rule Set
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:17 am
by hyperpape
It makes sense, but it probably would be impossible to score. At the end of the game, territories aren't likely to be defined.