Page 1 of 2

Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:22 am
by emeraldemon
I played white in this game and had some problems with my fuseki.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 tennuki to play pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . 5 . . b . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 6 . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:w7: felt bigger to me than responding to the upper left, since a and b are somewhat miai.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm8 Where to play here?
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . O . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So this is my question: where would you play next as white? My feeling was that the single black stone on top was vulnerable, so I played this way:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 My moves in game.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 5 . 4 . 3 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


This feels bad for white to me: coming back to protect at :w17: lets black get ahead in the jumps. The two white stones have no development and serve little purpose, and white's upper left group is solid but nearly sealed in. It's early, but it feels like what hasn't done anything to fight the handicap and is getting pushed around a bit. Any suggestions?

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:59 pm
by jts
I think you have two options, depending on how aggressive you want to be.

The steady-as-she-goes option is :w13: at f15 (or even b17). Now W is safe and h17 isn't doing anything. h15 is bad and l17 seems slow for B - if B plays either of those, W is happy to move on to the other corners. (Think of it the other way: if B plays h15 or l17 directly, you thank your lucky stars for a slow move and don't worry about the fearful power of B's followup at h17, do you?) If B abandons h15 to reinforce a corner, then it becomes a good target down the road.

F15 puts more pressure on black to prove that h17 makes good flow, but b17 applies an equal amount of pressure to prove that h17 is efficient in terms of points - he's giving up a lot, what can he get for it?

The other option is just to tenuki and see what B expects to accomplish with a follow-up move. That would aim to provoke a fight where B has a positional advantage, and W has the advantage of being W.

I'm not saying your way is wrong, though. You can just leave the top side tense and turn to other areas. But it seems like more of a handicap strategy, trusting your handling of the k15/17 stones won't be too burdensome.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:22 pm
by Tommie
1. diagram:
A and B do not feel miai in my opinion, as when Black takes the corner with A,
white has to extend to B for safety, yet without further benefits.
You could add a C - the 2-point extension of black's kakari
and state 'if white A, then Black B - hence White A is sente'
and imply that you could still play your desired white 7 in below right corner.

2nd diagram:
B10 feels too tight,
same the W13 afterwards.

Consider white's safety + profit + attack options on left black 2 stones after a white B17.

last diagram: Connecting under with white H18 connects 2 otherwise weak groups
and is therefor something I would really consider.

(I write this while I do not have the good option to see both your diagrams AND my comment).

Last but not least: Giving 2 stones is not much handicap, you give one move and hope for a sum of quite small mistakes {or 1 gote} etc.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:49 pm
by emeraldemon
So maybe I should have just played this way?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Take corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . X . . 2 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Seems like white is doing OK in this diagram, :b16: could secure the top or pincer, but either way is probably OK for white.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:00 pm
by Magicwand
you can not play his game and expect to win.
i suggest below.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 tennuki to play pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . 5 . . b . . . . 7 . . . . . |
$$ | . 6 . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:18 pm
by Bill Spight
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 5 . 4 . 3 . . 7 . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White can play :w19:, but White is not happy. As you indicate, :w17: is unsatisfactory, a kind of pushing from behind.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 4 . 3 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Surely the jump attachment is better. :)

But :w15: violates Jowa's advice: Don't run.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Don't run
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 6 4 3 . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 7 . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Keima for attack, says the proverb. This looks better. :)

However, the :bc: looks helpful to Black. It is a result of the exchange, :wc: - :bc:.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm11
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 . . O . X . 1 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So one thought is to pincer with :w11:. However, then :b12: looks good, threatening White's base.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm11
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . B . . 5 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 1 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Another thought is to prepare the pincer with :w11:. Note the two space pincer, which makes it harder for Black to sacrifice the :bc: stone.

But the problem is that :b10: presents difficulties for White. White should dictate the pace, if possible.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm7
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So Magicwand's suggestion is good. If you look at ancient games, where pros gave handicaps to pros, you see this kind of early approach to a 4-4 stone. Let White set the pace. :)

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:20 pm
by Bill Spight
emeraldemon wrote:So maybe I should have just played this way?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Take corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . X . . 2 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Seems like white is doing OK in this diagram, :b16: could secure the top or pincer, but either way is probably OK for white.


No, White's play is dull.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:08 am
by Phoenix
I don't know who Black is, but he/she seems to have a better sense for the opening than you do.

Are you sure the handicap is warranted? :scratch:

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:53 am
by illluck
Other than very clear tactial mistakes or stones very closely together, how can you tell if someone is or isn't 2 stones stronger by the first 20 moves?

I can't help but feel that too much is being read (no pun intended) into these few opening moves. In 2 stone games I tend to just play normally and hope to gradually catch up as the game progresses. Then again, my opening is pretty terrible.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:32 am
by emeraldemon
Phoenix wrote:I don't know who Black is, but he/she seems to have a better sense for the opening than you do.

Are you sure the handicap is warranted? :scratch:


It was a DGS game with the handicap automatically determined. Actually we are now the same rating, so maybe I should offer an even game and see how I do.

Here's the full game, not exactly my best ever but maybe you want to see my other mistakes also:


Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:05 am
by jts
Bill Spight wrote: No, White's play is dull.

Say more! I didn't recommend that exact sequence, but inducing :b14: @ l17 was my basic idea, so I want to hear more about why it sucks.

Dull as in loses points, or dull as in unenterprising?

And dull relative to the version where you changed :w7: (MW's suggestion), the version where you change :w11:, or the version where you change :w15:? (Because the main question I was thinking about was the placement of :w13:. I understand why the first two are more interesting than the dull variation.)

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:32 pm
by Bill Spight
jts wrote:
Bill Spight wrote: No, White's play is dull.

Say more! I didn't recommend that exact sequence, but inducing :b14: @ l17 was my basic idea, so I want to hear more about why it sucks.

Dull as in loses points, or dull as in unenterprising?


Both. The two often go together. If White's job with no handicap is to keep Black from having an easy opening, how much more is that the case when giving two stones. Allowing Black to make a base on the top side gives Black an easy opening. And I actually think that White has lost around 4 pts.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:04 pm
by mitsun
There sure are a lot of harsh reviewers here :) My take on the fuseki:
:w7: tenuki was fine, treating C17 and J17 as miai.
:w13: pincer attack was too early -- the black H17 stone is not that important.
Switching to an approach of the UR corner would be my first choice, but playing b17 is fine, especially if B promises to respond at L17. I do not think this is too dull.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:28 am
by Bill Spight
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Slow
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . B . . 2 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It is true that :b14: in this diagram is slow. But it makes a base for the :bc: stone and avoids complications when Black has the advantage.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Right side
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . B . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


The right side looks like the hottest part of the board now, and :b14: in this diagram may be best.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Top right corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . B . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


The large knight's extension here also looks good, and is more solid than the farther extension.

Both of these options treat the :bc: stone lightly. Why can they do that? Because it has forced White to protect with :w13:. That says it all, doesn't it? In a two stone game Black has pushed White around.

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:57 am
by Splatted
Bill Spight wrote:Both of these options treat the :bc: stone lightly. Why can they do that? Because it has forced White to protect with :w13:. That says it all, doesn't it? In a two stone game Black has pushed White around.


Actually I'd appreciate it if you said more. It may have been black's choice to make the exchange but that doesn't necessarily mean the exchange favours black, so why do you think this is a case of black pushing white around instead of white letting black dig his own grave? (or anything in between)

The situation's a little beyond me but I've often made a similar exchange thinking it was reasonable for both players.