A GoChild Question (#1)
-
saxmaam
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:22 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
A GoChild Question (#1)
It's under <Practice><Basic 900 Pack><Seal In><Question 20>
This module is about encapsulating/isolating your opponent.
The solution wants you to hit string of 4 on the head, then make a string of 3 on the third line. Why not a row of 2?
There is a problem posting the sgf code. The size of the board in GoChild is 11x11, but Eidego doesn't seem to support that size. So the original string of 4 black stones is supposed to be on line 4. Any suggestions how to deal with this?
This module is about encapsulating/isolating your opponent.
The solution wants you to hit string of 4 on the head, then make a string of 3 on the third line. Why not a row of 2?
There is a problem posting the sgf code. The size of the board in GoChild is 11x11, but Eidego doesn't seem to support that size. So the original string of 4 black stones is supposed to be on line 4. Any suggestions how to deal with this?
-
VincentCB
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:49 am
- Rank: OGS 1 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: KrazyV
- Tygem: kaiou19
- OGS: VincentCB
- Location: Canada
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
If I understand correctly, this is the solution from the website :
You are asking why this doesn't work :
The problem with
above is that white can cut :
What happens next? Try to find out by yourself. The continuation is below.
-
Mike Novack
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:36 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
First, you moved the problem the wrong way to deal with the board size issue. Where the edges are is quite relevant. We can't properly address the original problem because of the direction you moved it relative the edge. That is perhaps the first beginner lesson here, "edges matter".saxmaam wrote:It's under <Practice><Basic 900 Pack><Seal In><Question 20>
This module is about encapsulating/isolating your opponent.
The solution wants you to hit string of 4 on the head, then make a string of 3 on the third line. Why not a row of 2?
There is a problem posting the sgf code. The size of the board in GoChild is 11x11, but Eidego doesn't seem to support that size. So the original string of 4 black stones is supposed to be on line 4. Any suggestions how to deal with this?
-
saxmaam
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:22 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
Thanks, Mike. I did know that much. But I don't know what the right way is. So I asked ...Mike Novack wrote:First, you moved the problem the wrong way to deal with the board size issue. Where the edges are is quite relevant. We can't properly address the original problem because of the direction you moved it relative the edge. That is perhaps the first beginner lesson here, "edges matter".
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
saxmaam
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:22 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
OK, I got it. I ran out a different unfavorable scenario. Thanks for playing this out for me.VincentCB wrote: What happens next? Try to find out by yourself. The continuation is below.
-
xed_over
- Oza
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:51 am
- Has thanked: 1179 times
- Been thanked: 553 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
I love how Vincent just answered his question, while the rest of you chuckleheads just berate him over something he didn't even do, and was out of his control -- if you look at his sgf, it is correct (11x11)
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
xed_over wrote:I love how Vincent just answered his question, while the rest of you chuckleheads just berate him over something he didn't even do, and was out of his control -- if you look at his sgf, it is correct (11x11)
And were wrong in the berating...Mike Novack wrote: First, you moved the problem the wrong way to deal with the board size issue.
- Bonobo
- Oza
- Posts: 2225
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:39 pm
- Rank: OGS 13k
- GD Posts: 0
- OGS: trohde
- Universal go server handle: trohde
- Location: Lüneburg Heath, North Germany
- Has thanked: 8263 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
- Contact:
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
OK, so we see that even when nice people try to correct others’ mistakes they sometimes make even larger mistakes … <shrug>
Happens to me all the time
So, can we pls move on instead of rubbing salt in respective wounds?
Peace, Tom
Happens to me all the time
So, can we pls move on instead of rubbing salt in respective wounds?
Peace, Tom
“The only difference between me and a madman is that I’m not mad.” — Salvador Dali
-
Mike Novack
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:36 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
I am sorry if I wasn't being clear enough.
I was trying to say that compared to any mistake in play with the given formation (with any particular formation) the mistake in not realizing that relocating several spaces away from the edge might (would) completely change the problem was more serious for a beginner. I was not referring to a mistake in the mechanics of trying to present the problem to us.
I was trying to say that compared to any mistake in play with the given formation (with any particular formation) the mistake in not realizing that relocating several spaces away from the edge might (would) completely change the problem was more serious for a beginner. I was not referring to a mistake in the mechanics of trying to present the problem to us.
-
saxmaam
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:22 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: A GoChild Question (#1)
Mike, I totally realized the problem with the relocation. I was asking for help with that. I still am. Take a look at the original post.Mike Novack wrote:I am sorry if I wasn't being clear enough.
I was trying to say that compared to any mistake in play with the given formation (with any particular formation) the mistake in not realizing that relocating several spaces away from the edge might (would) completely change the problem was more serious for a beginner. I was not referring to a mistake in the mechanics of trying to present the problem to us.
Anyway, I think we are beating a dead horse here. I appreciate any and all sincere attempts to be helpful.
Best regards,
Susan
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
saxmaam
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:22 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re:
There's a thought. But doesn't the presence of the corner affect the solution to this particular problem?EdLee wrote:Hi Susan, if a certain board size doesn't work here, like 11x11, you can try another board size, like 13x13
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
Yes, good question. Exactly. For this particular shape, 9x9 is too small.saxmaam wrote:But doesn't the presence of the corner affect the solution to this particular problem?
Susan, here is a somewhat related shape. Maybe you have already seen this joseki --
-- In this 3-3 joseki, notice