Life In 19x19

I have a question about the current problem of the week. This is the problem.

This is the problem:

$$c Problem ...

My concern is that generally anything distributed alongside GPLv3 code must also be GPLv3. I am not a lawyer, so I have no idea how important this is in this context. I may just be overreacting.

I would like to participate, however this concerns me somewhat. The license in ThreadPool.h is not compatible with the GPLV3.

The code is released under the GPLv3 or later, except for ThreadPool.h, which has a specific license mentioned in that file.

Edit: Also, more importantly, I have no idea ...

$$W1
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . X . X X . . . .
$$ | . O O X X . X O . .
$$ | X . O X X X O X X X
$$ | X O . , O O O O . ,
$$ | O X O O O X X O X X
$$ | 3 X X X O O X O X O
$$ | . X . X . O X O X X
$$ | O O O X . O X O X O
$$ | 2 X X . X O X X X X
$$ | 1 X . , O O O X O ,
$$ | . O O O . X . X ...

Honestly if they don't play with long time settings I won't care very much. It would be kind of lame of Google claimed victory after winning with absurd time settings. I wouldn't consider the AI to have "won" until it wins with reasonable timing.
I'm fine as long as Lee sedol is the one who choose ...

Honestly if they don't play with long time settings I won't care very much. It would be kind of lame of Google claimed victory after winning with absurd time settings. I wouldn't consider the AI to have "won" until it wins with reasonable timing.

A remark overheard one clear morning: ‘I’m going to follow my joseki and take the dog out for a walk.’ … These days the word ‘joseki’ has come into general use to describe any fixed form of behavior… it is defined as ‘stones played in accordance with a fixed formula in the game of go.’
Is that ...

I just started playing. I watched alot before I got a beta key, but it's still a lot more difficult than I expected.

shapenaji wrote:

EdLee wrote:

TheBigH wrote:Today's XKCD is about go!

http://xkcd.com/1287/

Mr. Munroe seems better at chess than Go?

To be fair, his shape isn't that bad, and the white positions don't exist to lend context.

I don't know, I mean That certianly looks like a shoulder hit on a strong position...

Boidhre wrote:But if they are to follow your rule about no rules are they still really anarchists or just some form of libertarian?

I think that was the joke.

BigDoug wrote:You can do this today by creating a private room. Admins don't monitor private rooms.

It isn't really an anarchy room if people have to ask permission to enter...

ez4u wrote:So go straight to the heart of the matter instead.

I was curious if this was written by a scientist or by a journalist who took a class about statistics in college. The about the Author section was empty.

Well, passing isn't really practical. To capture pieces you have to be a step ahead of the other person. So if you pass you'll naturally be a step behind. If you capture first then want to stop playing, well, ok, but there's a lot of space on the board.

What if someone wanted to? Would you allow ...

If I had a pet robot who could look at the board and count the intersections for me, I'd consider playing your way, perhaps. unfortunately I'm a stupid human and it takes me fifteen minutes.

Play on the computer? Learn to count in like 2 minutes?

now I remember why I called you guys nerds back ...

I have personal experience in the method of scoring affecting the outcome of the game. I captured 38 of a person's pieces, and they won, because they had more territory. How can you still defend it?

You think this is just a beginner trying to say their stupid way of playing? How can you say that ...