Search found 20 matches
- Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:19 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
Please admit that it was an extremely conservative decision to edit my post.

- Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:53 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
<Sorry, plankton. I had to edit this.>
- Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:03 am
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
I think i have a better sequence here.
This way W makes life right away and lets B worry about what to do about the marked stones.
Either way W will be able to reinforce the left side.
$$Wcm36 ...
This way W makes life right away and lets B worry about what to do about the marked stones.
Either way W will be able to reinforce the left side.
$$Wcm36 ...
- Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:30 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
It looks like a hard fight to me.
If each side adopts the least compromising stance, I think it will go like this.
B can't use a keima at move 41 because even though B gets thick, W ends up with too many points.
$$Bcm41 ...
If each side adopts the least compromising stance, I think it will go like this.
B can't use a keima at move 41 because even though B gets thick, W ends up with too many points.
$$Bcm41 ...
- Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:48 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
I liked the double extension sequence with W 38 connecting via atekomi at 'a' or underneath. There is ugly kikashi left at 'b' so B probably needs to spend a move to defend that also.
$$Bcm33 ...
$$Bcm33 ...
- Wed Sep 01, 2010 7:18 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
Indeed, I can't help but wonder if white would bother with such a passive play for . I think that white can do more harm with below than black can with an unopposed .
$$Bcm31 ...
- Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:29 am
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
I think B will play f6 next and that W will respond.
I don't think B can nullify the marked stones with move 33.
In the first diagram, B plays the kosumi for move 33.
W can play this sequence and get a ko with a-f
B gets to play p2 also but it looks too risky.
$$Bcm31 ...
I don't think B can nullify the marked stones with move 33.
In the first diagram, B plays the kosumi for move 33.
W can play this sequence and get a ko with a-f
B gets to play p2 also but it looks too risky.
$$Bcm31 ...
- Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:27 am
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
Maybe W wants to try this probe at 30 first before playing at f6.
If the position ends up like this W can have this ko sequence starting with 'a' later on.
$$Wcm30 ...
If the position ends up like this W can have this ko sequence starting with 'a' later on.
$$Wcm30 ...
- Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:51 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
I like the 'd' option at f6 also.
Seems like a good idea to try to make b spend as many moves as possible on the bottom.
I think it makes b overconcentrated alot. there is still q2 yose that is threatening to o2 connecting m3 stones and monkey jump on bottom.
Seems like a good idea to try to make b spend as many moves as possible on the bottom.
I think it makes b overconcentrated alot. there is still q2 yose that is threatening to o2 connecting m3 stones and monkey jump on bottom.
- Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:29 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
I think Black has a better answer for 3
$$Bc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . , X ...
- Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:00 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
This seems slightly safer:
$$Bcm27
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . , X ...
- Mon Aug 30, 2010 7:14 am
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
if B connects at R6 and plays this sequence w needs to play 36 at Q2.
the cut at a is not a worry since W can play at b.
c is vital for b to live without capturing W 30.
$$Bcm27 ...
- Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:18 am
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: Prokovich game
- Replies: 488
- Views: 207629
Re: Prokovich game
W might play 26 here to avoid having to peep at a.
$$Wcm26
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . , X ...
$$Wcm26
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . , X ...
- Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:36 pm
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: interesting l&d from pro game today.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 8758
Re: interesting l&d from pro game today.
well thanks for your reply even though you seem to be somewhat mistrustful of me.
I did make a mistake in my first post though. it turns out that this is more of a yose problem than a genuine life and death problem.
But there is no correct solution #2. if b had played the wrong move i think w ...
I did make a mistake in my first post though. it turns out that this is more of a yose problem than a genuine life and death problem.
But there is no correct solution #2. if b had played the wrong move i think w ...
- Thu Aug 12, 2010 5:51 am
- Forum: Study Group
- Topic: interesting l&d from pro game today.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 8758
Re: interesting l&d from pro game today.
$$Bcm1
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O . O O O O . O . . . . |
$$ | . . O O O O . X O . X O X . . O X . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . X O , X O X X O X X . . |
$$ | . . X . X X X X X X . X . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . O O . O ...
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O . O O O O . O . . . . |
$$ | . . O O O O . X O . X O X . . O X . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . X O , X O X X O X X . . |
$$ | . . X . X X X X X X . X . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . O O . O ...