What is wrong with learning fuseki patterns at beginner lvl

[otenki]

Hi guys,

Lately i've been reading some books on fuseki patterns and i'm finding them usefull and fun to read.
For example i've read on orthodox, kobayashi and chinese.
But lately i've been getting a lot of comments on the fact that i should not be studying fuseki at my lvl.
Also in the store, fuseki books are ranked at dan lvl. Howhever nobody seems to be able to give me a good explanation on why i should not be studying this. In my humble opinion it helps to know how to attack, or more intresting how NOT to attack san-ren-sei for example.

Looking forward to hearing what you guys think...

Cheers,
Otenki

[RobertJasiek]

know how to attack, or more intresting how NOT to attack san-ren-sei

It is good to learn how to attack or how not to attack, better than knowing only how to attack (or: reduce) or how not to attack a moyo and yet better than knowing only how to attack or how not to attack a san-ren-sei moyo. IOW, specific knowledge does not hurt but more general knowledge is more useful.

comments on the fact that i should not be studying fuseki at my lvl.

It is better to learn more generally applicable knowledge before studying too specific details. Once you will have learnt all the general basics, it makes more sense to study also the details.

a good explanation on why i should not be studying this.

You are possibly spending (wasting) your time on the less urgent knowledge. First study the fundamentals, then study the more specific knowledge.

[otenki]

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for pointing that out to me.

Cheers,
Otenki

[judicata]

It isn't necessarily "wrong" to study fuseki early on, depending on what you mean by "wrong." I agree that it is not efficient to study fuseki as a beginner, because other things are FAR more important. You may get some benefit from it, just not nearly as much as studying fundamentals.

But amateur players have the luxury of being able to study things we enjoy. For example, I enjoyed reviewing professional games even around 10kyu. I didn't learn as much as I did from other study, but it helped keep my interest in the game. So if you enjoy studying opening patterns, then go for it. Just remain flexible, and know that it isn't the best way to improve.

[BaghwanB]

I'll agree with the theme of the above. It's perfectly OK to study it now but don't get caught up in attempting to memorize or master the "perfect" fuseki set since you have other aspects that should also be high (or higher) on your list of skills to acquire. I'd offer the same advice I give to beginners (more beginner than you...) about joseki study: Just get a feel for what to expect out of a given approach/response/pattern. Don't try to memorize/perfect them all. Just have an idea that "this protects the corner, that moves down the side".

That way if you get a move or two wrong, you don't blow the whole concept/goal of the pattern; you just didn't get max. efficiency out of it. No big deal at this level of play.

Have fun and study what you like, just remember to mix it up!

Bruce "Joseph Seki" Young

[Joaz Banbeck]

There is no way that more knowledge can hurt you. However, you can be mislead by thinking that you understand something when you don't, and that can lead to future misunderstandings.

For example, if you don't understand enough about attacking and killing, you may not understand why a certain approach to a certain stone in a certain fuseki is wrong. You may know that it gets killed because someone told you that it gets killed, but you don't know exactly how it gets killed. You don't really grok it. So you really aren't prepared to learn that fuseki.

Ideally, you learn tactics: enough so that you can look at that approach stone, and at a glance realize that it is going to get killed. Then you are prepared to study that fuseki. ( Or at least that corner of it )

Obviously, this approach of never studing something until you understand all of the building blocks can lead to paralysis if take to the extreme. How to avoid that?

Review what you have learned. Every once in a while, go back and review that things that you know. Take them apart and try to learn them again. The fuseki that you thought that you knew ( because you knew that the approach stone died ) you will now understand better the second time around ( because you will know why the approach stone dies. )

Understanding go may be compared to climbing a mountain via a long winding road that wraps around and around. The first time you are on the lower slopes you see things badly. Each time that you come around, you know more, and you have a better view of things. You see the same stuff, but you see it a little deeper each time through. Those 9dans at the top of the mountain have viewed the same scenery agan and again, and each time they learn more from it.

So, yes, study fuseki. Then, in a year or two, come back and study it again.

[Joaz Banbeck]

The best way to make that second pass through the fuseki that you think you know is to try to explain it to someone else. ( This is something that I learned trying to help people in the 'game analysis' subforum )

[gowan]

Unless I've misunderstood, the OP is hardly a beginner; he's sdk on kgs. So if he's writing for himself I'd say he can certainly benefit from studying the opening. I would recommend paying attention to how stones work together and what the general idea is for each opening and thinking about what the future development possibilities are for each of the common corner opening moves (3-3, 4-4, 3-4, 5-3, 5-4), and being consistent. At his level he could benefit from reading Otake's Opening Theory Made Easy. Yilun Yang's Fundamental Principles of Go, which has a lot of material on choosing moves in the opening, would also be a good choice at the 9k level.

[RobertJasiek]

the OP is hardly a beginner; he's sdk on kgs.

KGS 9k seems to be between 10k and 20k real world. Of course, there can be different definitions of "beginner"; the one I use is: DDK in the real world (except France).

[lemmata]

Looking forward to hearing what you guys think...

Cheers,
Otenki

There's nothing wrong with studying what you want to study. You are not a pro. This is a leisure activity. You should have as much fun as possible.

However, I think that studying fuseki patterns in-depth as a kyu player is a one of the less effective ways to get stronger.

Most people can get to 3~5 kyu easily by
1) Learning some opening principles and maybe 10 simple joseki (and a few ways to avoid the more complicated ones)
2) Doing some easy tesuji problems regularly
3) Protecting your weak groups / Don't get surrounded (This one alone might help you jump 3 ranks within three weeks if you are 9k now)

If you are interested in the opening, I strongly recommend problem books rather than pattern books. "Get Strong at the Opening" is a decent one. Because it is difficult to understand fuseki theory, it is easier to build a feel for the right move through repetition.

If you get a little stronger (maybe 3k?), then Fujisawa Shuko's "The Only Move" is a highly entertaining series to read. Each problem is from a pro game, so you can replay the first few moves on a board (this is helpful by itself), read the problem, think for 5 minutes, guess, and then play out Fujisawa's solution (and how he expects the game to unfold afterwards). Personal anecdotes are occasionally included, which makes it light reading. I am not sure if the book has increased my strength all that much, but it was really fun to read and can be read over and over again as one gets stronger. Again, there are better ways to get stronger, but if your intent is to have fun, "The Only Move" is a nice series to read. Also, the book may become more valuable as you get stronger.

[Buri]

Greetings,
some of the best opening training around can be found in the 'opening training' lectures of the Guo Juan Internet school.
Very powerful teaching in my opinion.
Best wishes,
Buri

[gowan]

the OP is hardly a beginner; he's sdk on kgs.

KGS 9k seems to be between 10k and 20k real world. Of course, there can be different definitions of "beginner"; the one I use is: DDK in the real world (except France).

Whatever you consider "beginner" to mean, I know people who have played go for 20 years and are still weak sdk's and with that much experience I wouldn't call them beginners. From the perspective of a top pro an amateur dan rank player might seem like a beginner. I can't remember who it was but some famous pro, in talking about a player, said something like "He's very weak, maybe amateur 5d in strength."

[hyperpape]

I believe it was Go Seigen, but I can't find a source.

[Bill Spight]

I believe it was Go Seigen, but I can't find a source.

That seems to ring a bell. Maybe it was Go Seigen's brother, saying of himself that he was very weak, only amateur 5 dan. (Back in the day when 5 dan was the highest amateur rank.)

[quantumf]

In my opinion and experience, if you want to get strong at go, do not study fuseki as a beginner. I disagree with the idea that any learning is better than no learning. I honestly believe that studying high level strategy, such as opening theory, is actually worse than useless because it gets you into bad learning habits and tempts you into avoiding to learn how to read, because you'll still improve (albeit slowly). Your reading ability is by far the most critical skill and without good reading you're to have a very low upper limit.