tygem

Post your games here for other members to critique your play.
Post Reply
sefo
Dies in gote
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:13 am
GD Posts: 0
Location: France
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 18 times

tygem

Post by sefo »

Played on tygem as 11k.
I usually don't take blitz seriously, but since it was a relatively close game, I'd like to see if there's any bad habit I should get rid of. (other than not play blitz...)

Attachments
tygem001.sgf
(1.38 KiB) Downloaded 422 times
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

sefo wrote:if there's any bad habit I should get rid of.
Yes. Broken shapes; free gifts to your opponent; forcing your opponent to get a ponnuki in sente, etc.
sefo
Dies in gote
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:13 am
GD Posts: 0
Location: France
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: tygem

Post by sefo »

oh, thanks for pointing out moves 50-52, I tend to do that very often!

A question though, on move 32 and 98, can we talk about broken shape when I just have 2 live groups separated? I think they are broken shapes when the groups are weak and you try to connect them. Here I didn't care about connecting, they're alive and I don't need to worry about the corner (m32) or the side (m98)

I this case I see these moves as securing points rather making connections and let the opponent take the territory. B slides between 2 live groups but he is not making points.

I understand the broken shape theory, but in this case it doesn't seem to make sense.

Thanks for the help.
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

sefo wrote:A question though, on move 32 and 98...
I understand the broken shape theory, but in this case it doesn't seem to make sense.
Good questions. You are confusing cuts with broken shapes.
See also http://senseis.xmp.net/?SqueezingOutTheToothpaste[hide]
sefo wrote:can we talk about broken shape when I just have 2 live groups separated?
I think they are broken shapes when the groups are weak and you try to connect them.
Broken shape is not about separating live or weak groups (although it can do that).
Broken shapes are shape problems, not (necessarily) life-and-death problems (which is the point about cutting weak groups).

For the broken shape of :w30:, see the variation of :b37:.
If it was the upper left corner that you wanted (which it was),
then it was :w24: that was the problem -- wrong direction.
The broken shape of :w30: is hurting yourself first:
if :w30: at F16 instead, then you're building a nice W wall -- in the game, B crushes your shape,
and suddenly your G16 group went from a source of strength (the wall)
to a potential weak group. This swing (from strength to weakness) is huge --
this is the damage of the broken shape.

To quote an L19 frequent contributor shapenaji, :w30: makes my eyes bleed.

For :w98:, once again the question is why do you want to hurt yourself first?
The :w96: push, then :w98: broken shape -- it's another story if it was Black
who was weak and you were attacking B, trying to make B heavy.
But here, it's the R6 W group that was weak, and the broken shape just hurt yourself more.
Instead of :w96: and :w98:, you could've just jumped to P9 directly (instead of :w96:).
sefo wrote:they're alive and I don't need to worry about the corner ( :w32:) or the side ( :w98:)
It's exact opposite: after the broken shapes in both cases,
you DO have to worry about the upper left corner and also your weak H16 and R6 groups![/hide]
sefo
Dies in gote
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:13 am
GD Posts: 0
Location: France
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: tygem

Post by sefo »

Thanks a lot for the explanation. I'll defenitely work on it.
User avatar
Joaz Banbeck
Judan
Posts: 5546
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Location: Banbeck Vale
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 1434 times

Re: tygem

Post by Joaz Banbeck »

Not a bad game. The most remarkable thing about it is how long big plays on the left side went unnoticed by both of you. :o



PS: I glanced at Ed's comments. I like his move 24 even better than mine.
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
Post Reply