kivi wrote: Can you post that game.
Right, thanks.
I did. They say that it is joseki.kivi wrote: ah, I see. Then can Bill or somebody who has the book post what it says about that variation?
They also say that if White presses at
kivi wrote: Can you post that game.
Right, thanks.
I did. They say that it is joseki.kivi wrote: ah, I see. Then can Bill or somebody who has the book post what it says about that variation?
I don't! The low position of white's corner, and the fact that black is undercut would make me think that influence is less important than normalkivi wrote: On a serious note, especially second game it is easy to see the special reason why the differing move (n5 there) becomes more attractive than usual.
Yes, I didn't see it either! Positionally, the bottom doesn't seem bigger than the lower right. But perhaps kivi's idea is that the cut at r4 is bad?speedchase wrote:I don't! The low position of white's corner, and the fact that black is undercut would make me think that influence is less important than normalkivi wrote: On a serious note, especially second game it is easy to see the special reason why the differing move (n5 there) becomes more attractive than usual.