Influence in go

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
User avatar
oren
Oza
Posts: 2777
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
Location: Seattle, WA
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: Influence in go

Post by oren »

Thanks, Bill! This has been interesting to follow.
RobertJasiek
Judan
Posts: 6273
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
Been thanked: 797 times
Contact:

Re: Influence in go

Post by RobertJasiek »

Bill Spight wrote:Influence needs to be corrected for overconcentration.
This can be done by considering both influence and efficiency.
User avatar
topazg
Tengen
Posts: 4511
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Location: Chatteris, UK
Has thanked: 1579 times
Been thanked: 650 times
Contact:

Re: Influence in go

Post by topazg »

Bill Spight wrote:
topazg wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:Given the final result, the estimation of -9.3 seems too big for White.
I'm following this with some interest, but I do have an observation of concern on this statement (and others like it) - Without access to the discussions between professionals on the game in question, how do we know that this isn't an accurate assumption, where White's theoretical advantage was slowly removed by suboptimal play?
I think that we can trust pro play more than we can trust the estimates. ;)
True, but slightly off the point ;)

My point is that your estimation was not at the end of the game. Pros would be the first to admit that their play isn't perfect, and that dropping back from an even position to a 10 point loss is by no means unreasonable, even if it was over a single poor decision between your template point and the end. There are lots of games with pro commentaries, and it may be that this game was considered dead even at the point you predicted it would be, so to make the assumption that the end of the game being a 10 point difference means your mid-game estimate was off seems unjustified, that's all :)
User avatar
david_gfe_games
Beginner
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:56 pm
GD Posts: 0
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Influence in go

Post by david_gfe_games »

Bill,

You mentioned your paper (Influence in Go) at the Symposium in August. All I can find is the link back to this thread. Are you papers available for download?
Kind Regards,
David Trounce
The Game of Go is not Chess.
msgreg
Lives with ko
Posts: 294
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:58 am
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: MSGreg
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Influence in go

Post by msgreg »

david_gfe_games wrote:Bill,

You mentioned your paper (Influence in Go) at the Symposium in August. All I can find is the link back to this thread. Are you papers available for download?
If you found links back to this thread, you may have already found the link to the video at the Go Symposium website by clicking on the video link in the menu. Bill's is session 5.
Founder, Central Mississippi Go Club
Free tips and resources for clubs and teaching
Go Kit Club Pack - pack of 13x13 go sets for clubs
Go Tin - very portable go
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Influence in go

Post by Bill Spight »

david_gfe_games wrote:Bill,

You mentioned your paper (Influence in Go) at the Symposium in August. All I can find is the link back to this thread. Are you papers available for download?
Well, the Power Point presentation is it. No paper. As for my other papers, I do not have web site right now. Check MSRI or Martin Mueller's site. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Post Reply