branches (variations) in my reading

If you're new to the game and have questions, post them here.
Post Reply
User avatar
otenki
Lives in gote
Posts: 415
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:41 am
Rank: EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: tygempanda
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 32 times

branches (variations) in my reading

Post by otenki »

Hi guys,

I've been studying essential life and death 1, 2 & 3 (4 is too hard for me).

For those who don't know the books:

Its about life & death (obviously), they start with one problem and work there way through the problem in steps.
Learning key vital points by repition and technique on how to read out life and death in the process.
As such, the books are not so much raw-reading training but vital points & technique studying.

I'm not saying you don't require decent reading howhever :-)

Now one of the good things of this book is that after the first diagram, the second diagram will have one or more moves ahead. Then the next one will potentialy have variations on resistances that white (in case you are black) can do.

Now my problem is that I tend to miss a lot of variations. I do come to the final result by reading most of the main sequences which is good.
But some of the not so obvious repsonses I tend to miss a lot.

Does anybody else experienced this and has resolved it in their reading ?
How did you do it ?

I also notice this in some of my games, I read quite deep but only to realise that my oponent does something completely unexpected which leaves me having to re-read everything. It seems as if I'm having problems with knowing what to read.

Btw: I can give practical examples if you should not understand what I mean.

Cheers,
Otenki
User avatar
Phelan
Gosei
Posts: 1449
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:15 pm
Rank: KGS 6k
GD Posts: 892
Has thanked: 1550 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: branches (variations) in my reading

Post by Phelan »

This is one of the essential parts of getting stronger, I think. You can avoid missing variations if you consider each and every move in the area you're reading, but then you spend much more time and effort reading.

As you study shape and tsumego(among other things), some moves will start jumping to your eye before others, and make it easy to trim more useless branches from your reading.
a1h1 [1d]: You just need to curse the gods and defend.
Good Go = Shape.
Associação Portuguesa de Go
billywoods
Lives in gote
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:12 pm
Rank: 3 kyu
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: billywoods
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: branches (variations) in my reading

Post by billywoods »

otenki wrote:But some of the not so obvious repsonses I tend to miss a lot.

The good news: a lot of them tend to just be perfectly normal tesuji (e.g. various eye-stealing tesuji), simply applied in weird-looking places. Practise and improve. The bad news: when they're designed to set up things like shortages of liberties, they are massively non-obvious and random-looking, at least to me.
User avatar
SoDesuNe
Gosei
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:57 am
Rank: KGS 1-dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 490 times
Been thanked: 365 times

Re: branches (variations) in my reading

Post by SoDesuNe »

My Tsumego-books only have one or two lines of resistance so I mostly cover these. When I didn't think about one particular resistance I mark the problem as "wrong" since I figured the move will have some merit otherwise it would have not been listed.

The important point is not to read everything without exception but to understand or feel which moves are important to read. That comes with experience, I guess. Just be open-minded and accept oversights, so that you can learn from them.

An example from a problem I just did:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Black to kill
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . .
$$ | . X O . . . X O X . X
$$ | . X X O O O O O X . .
$$ | . . X X X X X X X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


My thought-process:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Black to kill - 1
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . O . 4 3 2 1 . . .
$$ | . X O . . . X O X . X
$$ | . X X O O O O O X . .
$$ | . . X X X X X X X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Just connecting with :b1: obviously does not work because of White's common Tesuji at :w2:.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Black to kill - 2
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . O . 1 a . . . . .
$$ | . X O . 2 . X O X . X
$$ | . X X O O O O O X . .
$$ | . . X X X X X X X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


So, my opponent's vital point is my own? Sadly after :w2: Black can't prevent White from getting 'a'.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Black to kill - 3
$$ ------------------
$$ | . 3 O 4 2 . a 5 . . .
$$ | . X O 1 . . X O X . X
$$ | . X X O O O O O X . .
$$ | . . X X X X X X X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Something fancy seems to be called for and when White answers :b1: with :w2: Black can play :b5: to safely connect - Great! (Throw-In at 'a' does not work here because it puts White in Atari.)

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Black to kill - 4
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . O 7 . 6 5 3 . . .
$$ | . X O 1 2 4 X O X . X
$$ | . X X O O O O O X . .
$$ | . . X X X X X X X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


If White plays :w2: here, Black can also safely connect at :b3: and after :b7: White is dead due Miai.

So problem solved right? Well, it depends on what aspirations you have. Diagrammes 3 and 4 do not show the best solution.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Black to kill - Solution
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . O . 3 a 2 1 . . .
$$ | . X O b . . X O X . X
$$ | . X X O O O O O X . .
$$ | . . X X X X X X X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


THIS is the best solution. Plain and simple. Miai on move 3. Never even thought about this order of moves.


You see, solving the problem is not automatically solving the problem ; )
Post Reply