What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Comments, questions, rants, etc, that are specifically about the Kaya Go Server go here
Post Reply

The way games are started on kaya...

is the best way possible.
1
4%
is perfectly acceptable.
2
8%
is not great, but it's not a problem for me.
7
28%
is not great, and it is a problem for me.
11
44%
is lousy, and makes me not want to play on kaya.
3
12%
is the worst way of starting a game that I have ever seen.
1
4%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
daal
Oza
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:30 am
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 1304 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by daal »

It's my personal suspicion, that the main reason people are not flocking to kaya.gs is that they don't like the way games are started. Since Gabriel has lowered his stake in the server, I thought he might now be willing to make a change if popular opinion demands it. What do you think, is this the deal breaker, just another meh factor, or perhaps one of the reasons you're still there?

Vote for any of the first three to refute my suspicion, and for any of the last three to confirm it.
Patience, grasshopper.
User avatar
oren
Oza
Posts: 2777
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
Location: Seattle, WA
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by oren »

The main problem with Kaya is the UI. The game creation is only a small part of that.
Ryuukun
Dies in gote
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:10 pm
Rank: KGS 5 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Ryuukun
Tygem: JoeFutile
OGS: Ryuukun
Universal go server handle: Ryuukun
Location: Germany
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by Ryuukun »

The thing I dislike the most is that kaya is browser based and not client based. I just like client based games that much more.
User avatar
cdybeijing
Lives in gote
Posts: 581
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:27 am
Rank: IGS 2 dan
GD Posts: 0
Location: Shanghai, China
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 100 times
Contact:

Re: What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by cdybeijing »

daal wrote:It's my personal suspicion, that the main reason people are not flocking to kaya.gs is that they don't like the way games are started. Since Gabriel has lowered his stake in the server, I thought he might now be willing to make a change if popular opinion demands it. What do you think, is this the deal breaker, just another meh factor, or perhaps one of the reasons you're still there?

Vote for any of the first three to refute my suspicion, and for any of the last three to confirm it.


When you say Gabriel has lowered his stake in the server, what does that refer to?
User avatar
Bonobo
Oza
Posts: 2223
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:39 pm
Rank: OGS 9k
GD Posts: 0
OGS: trohde
Universal go server handle: trohde
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 8262 times
Been thanked: 924 times
Contact:

Re: What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by Bonobo »

cdybeijing wrote:When you say Gabriel has lowered his stake in the server, what does that refer to?
I think Daal means Gabriel’s last blog post.

See also the discussion of this here.
“The only difference between me and a madman is that I’m not mad.” — Salvador Dali ★ Play a slooooow correspondence game with me on OGS? :)
User avatar
karaklis
Lives in sente
Posts: 797
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:14 pm
GD Posts: 600
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by karaklis »

The way to start games makes a huge difference. Whenever I login to Flyordie (which I do rarely though), it takes about 30 seconds to get the first challenge. One click and the game is running. Otherwise the activation energy that is needed to start a game seems to high (at least for me these days). I am not sure whether I am challenged on flyordie by the player himself or whether the software chooses the opponents and creates the game automatically, but the way they are doing this seems to be efficient enough to get such a small group of players alive (their main rooms is usually populated by around 100 players). Some kind of automatch with standard game settings (board size, time settings, max difference of handi stones) would probably a good way for Kaya to get more games played.
lobotommy
Lives in gote
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:01 am
Rank: EGF 3kyu
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: tommyray (1d/2d)
Location: Poland, Gliwice
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by lobotommy »

I think opening a new window is not the best. I start a game than start doing something different while waiting, and I'm not aware when the game is realy started. I would prefer to open up a window with a game only when the opponent click on a game offer. Or maybe change it to something similiar to playok.com approach - you open a table (not an invitation or waiting screen) and just wait for an opponent to come to play/chat. Probably it's the best, better than KGS idea of open invitations and better than manual sending invitations as on other go servers like tygem, wbaduk, igs, etc.
Tsumego/Tesuji apps for iPad, iPhone & Android devices:http://www.lifein19x19.com/forum/viewto ... =18&t=7511
User avatar
Monadology
Lives in gote
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:26 pm
Rank: KGS 7 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Krill
OGS: Krill
Location: Riverside CA
Has thanked: 246 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: What do you think about Kaya's way of starting games?

Post by Monadology »

The lack of automatch is a big dealbreaker for me, in combination with the small number of players and the lack of notification when a game has started.

Of course, automatch won't make a huge difference at first with a small population. It does change the dynamic though. As it is, I can start a game and go do other things while I wait for an opponent to notice my game. This means at least one player has to be actively engaging in finding a match. With automatch, both parties can fire and forget. Similarly, I'm never sure if I see an open match whether or no it's intended to be open to anyone. Automatch is a way of clearly flagging that you're just looking for a match with someone else, but no one in particular.
Post Reply