magicwand versus drmwc

Post Reply
User avatar
drmwc
Lives in gote
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:18 pm
Rank: 4 Dan European
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: magicwand versus drmwc

Post by drmwc »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm149 B has captured 9; W has captured 3
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . O O X X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X O O X X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . X O O O . . X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O O O X O . , O X . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . X O X O O O X X . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . X X O X O O X . . . . . X . |
$$ | . O O O . . . O X X X . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . X . . . X . O O . . . X . X 1 O O . |
$$ | . . X . . . X X O . O O X . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X , X X . . X O O . O O . , . . . |
$$ | . X O . X . . X . X X O X O . O . . . |
$$ | . . O . O X X . X . . O . X X . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . O . X O X X . X . X . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O . O . O . O . O O . . O O X X . |
$$ | . . . X O . O . . . . . O O . O X O X |
$$ | . . O O X X . . O , X O X X O O O X . |
$$ | . . O X . X . . . . . O X X X X X . . |
$$ | . 3 X . X . . . X . O . O X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]



Edited to add score estimate.

B:
18 points lower right.
12 points lower left.
19 point centre and left hand side.
45 points top.
94 points total

W:
15 points lower side group
15 point RHS
35 points upper left
6.5 kmoi
Less than 70 total

Despite my yose being slack, I appear to have a lead of around 25 points and W's available aji is fast disappearing.
Top
User avatar
Magicwand
Tengen
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:26 am
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
GD Posts: 0
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 504 times

Re: magicwand versus drmwc

Post by Magicwand »

i think i will resign.
thank you for the game.
for obs.. sorry about bad game.
i think i was too timid on the beginning and never had chance.

drmwc: watching your game as ob gave me feeling that i can easily win against you. i guess watching and playing is two different thing. ^^
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"
Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson
Top
User avatar
drmwc
Lives in gote
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:18 pm
Rank: 4 Dan European
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: magicwand versus drmwc

Post by drmwc »

Thank you for the game.
Top
User avatar
Joaz Banbeck
Judan
Posts: 5546
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Location: Banbeck Vale
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 1434 times

Re: magicwand versus drmwc

Post by Joaz Banbeck »

Thanks to both of you for doing it. It has been very enjoyable to watch. :salute:

@MW: If you could play move 54 over again, would you still play it at F16?
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
Top
User avatar
Magicwand
Tengen
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:26 am
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
GD Posts: 0
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 504 times

Re: magicwand versus drmwc

Post by Magicwand »

Joaz Banbeck wrote:Thanks to both of you for doing it. It has been very enjoyable to watch. :salute:

@MW: If you could play move 54 over again, would you still play it at F16?


i dont think 54 was wrong... it was a probe.
i think 66 was too timid. (i already lost flow at this point)
i should have extended IMO.

Playing too timid and losing flow plus your opponent not making mistake will make the game look bad :)
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"
Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson
Top
User avatar
drmwc
Lives in gote
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:18 pm
Rank: 4 Dan European
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: magicwand versus drmwc

Post by drmwc »

I think 74 was an overplay.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm74
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . X . . . . . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O X . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O X . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . X X O X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . . . O X . Q . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . O . . . . X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . X . O . O O X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , X X O O . O . X O O . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . X O O . O X X . X O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . O X . . X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . X . X X . X . X . 1 . . . . |
$$ | . . O . O . O . O . O O 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X O . O . . . . . . a . Q . . . |
$$ | . . O O X X . . O , X . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


W played at a. However, isn't the game more fun for white as shown? Next W can consider either of the marked moves. W has quite a lot of liberties on the top group, so B will be keen to avoid a semeai.


Having looked at the comments, this is an intersting juntion:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm41
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , X X O O . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . O . . . X . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . O . . . O . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X O . O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O X X . . O , X . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


MW's opininion is that my move is a mistake, and I should take the 3-3. However, I'm pretty happy with this move.
I want to cut in the centre, and it doens't seem to work without this move.
It strenghtens my central group (but with a slight hole).
It builds a loose moyo (with some holes)
It makes the 3-3 next quite severe.

So I thought it was a m ulti-purpose move, whereas if I go in at the 3-3 I become thin across the board.

The white respsone shown may have been interesting (although I would also have protected the corner.)
Top
Post Reply

Return to “1-on-1 Malkovich games”