Tygem and the AGA's prosystem

The home for discussions about the AGA.
User avatar
csobod
Dies in gote
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:37 am
Rank: IGS 17k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: csobod
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Tygem and the AGA's prosystem

Post by csobod »

xed_over wrote:But I'm not surprised either. The event never drew large crowds. Not even medium or even small crowds. No crowds at all. (I don't think there was ever more than 20 people logged on watching a game at any one time throughout the week, and most of those were probably at the event already). I think Tygem was hoping for a little bit larger turnout.

I don't watch live games frequently, but I was one of these 20 apparently. And to be fair, most people would rather look at and comment on SGFs after the event.
Sincerely, Chad R. Sobodash
User avatar
quantumf
Lives in sente
Posts: 844
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:36 pm
Rank: 3d
GD Posts: 422
KGS: komi
Has thanked: 180 times
Been thanked: 151 times

Re: Tygem and the AGA's prosystem

Post by quantumf »

csobod wrote:I don't watch live games frequently, but I was one of these 20 apparently. And to be fair, most people would rather look at and comment on SGFs after the event.


I enjoy watching games live, and I've certainly seen games attract 600 live viewers on KGS. I'm sure Tygem have the potential for even more.
Mef
Lives in sente
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:34 am
Rank: KGS [-]
GD Posts: 428
Location: Central Coast
Has thanked: 201 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Re: Tygem and the AGA's prosystem

Post by Mef »

csobod wrote: And to be fair, most people would rather look at and comment on SGFs after the event.



Perhaps, but if this is true, it might mean that the sponsor was ill-suited for the event (and would explain their discontinued sponsorship). Presumably the reason Tygem was willing to sponsor the AGA pro league is because they thought it would bring a large number of AGA players into their server (allowing them to recoup their sponsorship). I wouldn't be surprised if someone ran those numbers and decided it wasn't cost-effective for them to continue.
Post Reply