Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
User avatar
emeraldemon
Gosei
Posts: 1744
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: greendemon
Tygem: greendemon
DGS: smaragdaemon
OGS: emeraldemon
Has thanked: 697 times
Been thanked: 287 times

Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by emeraldemon »

I played white in this game and had some problems with my fuseki.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 tennuki to play pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . 5 . . b . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 6 . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:w7: felt bigger to me than responding to the upper left, since a and b are somewhat miai.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm8 Where to play here?
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . O . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So this is my question: where would you play next as white? My feeling was that the single black stone on top was vulnerable, so I played this way:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 My moves in game.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 5 . 4 . 3 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


This feels bad for white to me: coming back to protect at :w17: lets black get ahead in the jumps. The two white stones have no development and serve little purpose, and white's upper left group is solid but nearly sealed in. It's early, but it feels like what hasn't done anything to fight the handicap and is getting pushed around a bit. Any suggestions?
User avatar
jts
Oza
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
Rank: kgs 6k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 632 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by jts »

I think you have two options, depending on how aggressive you want to be.

The steady-as-she-goes option is :w13: at f15 (or even b17). Now W is safe and h17 isn't doing anything. h15 is bad and l17 seems slow for B - if B plays either of those, W is happy to move on to the other corners. (Think of it the other way: if B plays h15 or l17 directly, you thank your lucky stars for a slow move and don't worry about the fearful power of B's followup at h17, do you?) If B abandons h15 to reinforce a corner, then it becomes a good target down the road.

F15 puts more pressure on black to prove that h17 makes good flow, but b17 applies an equal amount of pressure to prove that h17 is efficient in terms of points - he's giving up a lot, what can he get for it?

The other option is just to tenuki and see what B expects to accomplish with a follow-up move. That would aim to provoke a fight where B has a positional advantage, and W has the advantage of being W.

I'm not saying your way is wrong, though. You can just leave the top side tense and turn to other areas. But it seems like more of a handicap strategy, trusting your handling of the k15/17 stones won't be too burdensome.
User avatar
Tommie
Dies with sente
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:56 am
Rank: 3d EGF
GD Posts: 1700
Location: still above sea level: http://bit.ly/eQYULx
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Tommie »

1. diagram:
A and B do not feel miai in my opinion, as when Black takes the corner with A,
white has to extend to B for safety, yet without further benefits.
You could add a C - the 2-point extension of black's kakari
and state 'if white A, then Black B - hence White A is sente'
and imply that you could still play your desired white 7 in below right corner.

2nd diagram:
B10 feels too tight,
same the W13 afterwards.

Consider white's safety + profit + attack options on left black 2 stones after a white B17.

last diagram: Connecting under with white H18 connects 2 otherwise weak groups
and is therefor something I would really consider.

(I write this while I do not have the good option to see both your diagrams AND my comment).

Last but not least: Giving 2 stones is not much handicap, you give one move and hope for a sum of quite small mistakes {or 1 gote} etc.
Greetings,
Tommie

3dan EGF (AGA no 13477) || Tommie on KGS: 'June'|| DGS: 'Zhi Laohu' 纸老虎 = 'paper tiger' || Senseis : http://senseis.xmp.net/?tderz ||
ENFP (MBTI) - 'Find your own style within the Fundamentals of Go! '
User avatar
emeraldemon
Gosei
Posts: 1744
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: greendemon
Tygem: greendemon
DGS: smaragdaemon
OGS: emeraldemon
Has thanked: 697 times
Been thanked: 287 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by emeraldemon »

So maybe I should have just played this way?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Take corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . X . . 2 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Seems like white is doing OK in this diagram, :b16: could secure the top or pincer, but either way is probably OK for white.
User avatar
Magicwand
Tengen
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:26 am
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
GD Posts: 0
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 504 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Magicwand »

you can not play his game and expect to win.
i suggest below.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 tennuki to play pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . 5 . . b . . . . 7 . . . . . |
$$ | . 6 . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Bill Spight »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 5 . 4 . 3 . . 7 . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White can play :w19:, but White is not happy. As you indicate, :w17: is unsatisfactory, a kind of pushing from behind.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . 4 . 3 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Surely the jump attachment is better. :)

But :w15: violates Jowa's advice: Don't run.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Don't run
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W . . O . X . 1 . . 2 . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 6 4 3 . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 7 . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Keima for attack, says the proverb. This looks better. :)

However, the :bc: looks helpful to Black. It is a result of the exchange, :wc: - :bc:.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm11
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 . . O . X . 1 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So one thought is to pincer with :w11:. However, then :b12: looks good, threatening White's base.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm11
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . B . . 5 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 1 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Another thought is to prepare the pincer with :w11:. Note the two space pincer, which makes it harder for Black to sacrifice the :bc: stone.

But the problem is that :b10: presents difficulties for White. White should dictate the pace, if possible.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm7
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So Magicwand's suggestion is good. If you look at ancient games, where pros gave handicaps to pros, you see this kind of early approach to a 4-4 stone. Let White set the pace. :)
Last edited by Bill Spight on Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Bill Spight »

emeraldemon wrote:So maybe I should have just played this way?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Take corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . X . . 2 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Seems like white is doing OK in this diagram, :b16: could secure the top or pincer, but either way is probably OK for white.


No, White's play is dull.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Phoenix
Lives with ko
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:44 pm
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 301 times
Been thanked: 127 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Phoenix »

I don't know who Black is, but he/she seems to have a better sense for the opening than you do.

Are you sure the handicap is warranted? :scratch:
illluck
Lives in sente
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
Rank: OGS 2d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by illluck »

Other than very clear tactial mistakes or stones very closely together, how can you tell if someone is or isn't 2 stones stronger by the first 20 moves?

I can't help but feel that too much is being read (no pun intended) into these few opening moves. In 2 stone games I tend to just play normally and hope to gradually catch up as the game progresses. Then again, my opening is pretty terrible.
User avatar
emeraldemon
Gosei
Posts: 1744
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: greendemon
Tygem: greendemon
DGS: smaragdaemon
OGS: emeraldemon
Has thanked: 697 times
Been thanked: 287 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by emeraldemon »

Phoenix wrote:I don't know who Black is, but he/she seems to have a better sense for the opening than you do.

Are you sure the handicap is warranted? :scratch:


It was a DGS game with the handicap automatically determined. Actually we are now the same rating, so maybe I should offer an even game and see how I do.

Here's the full game, not exactly my best ever but maybe you want to see my other mistakes also:

User avatar
jts
Oza
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
Rank: kgs 6k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 632 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by jts »

Bill Spight wrote: No, White's play is dull.

Say more! I didn't recommend that exact sequence, but inducing :b14: @ l17 was my basic idea, so I want to hear more about why it sucks.

Dull as in loses points, or dull as in unenterprising?

And dull relative to the version where you changed :w7: (MW's suggestion), the version where you change :w11:, or the version where you change :w15:? (Because the main question I was thinking about was the placement of :w13:. I understand why the first two are more interesting than the dull variation.)
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Bill Spight »

jts wrote:
Bill Spight wrote: No, White's play is dull.

Say more! I didn't recommend that exact sequence, but inducing :b14: @ l17 was my basic idea, so I want to hear more about why it sucks.

Dull as in loses points, or dull as in unenterprising?


Both. The two often go together. If White's job with no handicap is to keep Black from having an easy opening, how much more is that the case when giving two stones. Allowing Black to make a base on the top side gives Black an easy opening. And I actually think that White has lost around 4 pts.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
mitsun
Lives in gote
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:10 pm
Rank: AGA 5 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 250 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by mitsun »

There sure are a lot of harsh reviewers here :) My take on the fuseki:
:w7: tenuki was fine, treating C17 and J17 as miai.
:w13: pincer attack was too early -- the black H17 stone is not that important.
Switching to an approach of the UR corner would be my first choice, but playing b17 is fine, especially if B promises to respond at L17. I do not think this is too dull.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Bill Spight »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Slow
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . B . . 2 . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It is true that :b14: in this diagram is slow. But it makes a base for the :bc: stone and avoids complications when Black has the advantage.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Right side
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . B . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


The right side looks like the hottest part of the board now, and :b14: in this diagram may be best.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm13 Top right corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 O . . O . B . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


The large knight's extension here also looks good, and is more solid than the farther extension.

Both of these options treat the :bc: stone lightly. Why can they do that? Because it has forced White to protect with :w13:. That says it all, doesn't it? In a two stone game Black has pushed White around.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Splatted
Lives in sente
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:41 pm
Rank: Washed up never was
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Splatted
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Fuseki in 2-stone handicap game

Post by Splatted »

Bill Spight wrote:Both of these options treat the :bc: stone lightly. Why can they do that? Because it has forced White to protect with :w13:. That says it all, doesn't it? In a two stone game Black has pushed White around.


Actually I'd appreciate it if you said more. It may have been black's choice to make the exchange but that doesn't necessarily mean the exchange favours black, so why do you think this is a case of black pushing white around instead of white letting black dig his own grave? (or anything in between)

The situation's a little beyond me but I've often made a similar exchange thinking it was reasonable for both players.
Post Reply