kgs html client
-
moboy78
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 7:23 am
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: moboy78
- IGS: moboy78
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
kgs html client
I've heard from various sources that wms is making an html client for KGS. Anyone know when it will be up and running and how it can be accessed?
- Bonobo
- Oza
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:39 pm
- Rank: OGS 9k
- GD Posts: 0
- OGS: trohde
- Universal go server handle: trohde
- Location: Germany
- Has thanked: 8262 times
- Been thanked: 924 times
- Contact:
Re: kgs html client
“The only difference between me and a madman is that I’m not mad.” — Salvador Dali ★ Play a slooooow correspondence game with me on OGS? 
-
Mef
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:34 am
- Rank: KGS [-]
- GD Posts: 428
- Location: Central Coast
- Has thanked: 201 times
- Been thanked: 333 times
Re: kgs html client
moboy78 wrote:I've heard from various sources that wms is making an html client for KGS. Anyone know when it will be up and running and how it can be accessed?
The html 5 client is only in a limited alpha test right now. Hopefully once some of the bugs get worked out and the client is a little more polished it will move into a beta.
-
Pippen
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:34 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: 2d
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: kgs html client
What are the numbers of accounts/players 2012 and right now? I have the impression KGS gets fewer and fewer players. Even with automatch it takes quite long to find an opponent and mostly you just have a handful of dan players offering games while 30 bots make the game window seem full.
Is this the beginning of the end? I basically abandoned KGS...and I wonder if I just followed a general movement that is going on very right now.
Is this the beginning of the end? I basically abandoned KGS...and I wonder if I just followed a general movement that is going on very right now.
-
skydyr
- Oza
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: skydyr
- Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
- Location: DC
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
Re: kgs html client
Pippen wrote:What are the numbers of accounts/players 2012 and right now? I have the impression KGS gets fewer and fewer players. Even with automatch it takes quite long to find an opponent and mostly you just have a handful of dan players offering games while 30 bots make the game window seem full.
Is this the beginning of the end? I basically abandoned KGS...and I wonder if I just followed a general movement that is going on very right now.
Out of curiosity, how restrictive are your automatch settings?
-
Mef
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:34 am
- Rank: KGS [-]
- GD Posts: 428
- Location: Central Coast
- Has thanked: 201 times
- Been thanked: 333 times
Re: kgs html client
Pippen wrote:What are the numbers of accounts/players 2012 and right now? I have the impression KGS gets fewer and fewer players. Even with automatch it takes quite long to find an opponent and mostly you just have a handful of dan players offering games while 30 bots make the game window seem full.
Is this the beginning of the end? I basically abandoned KGS...and I wonder if I just followed a general movement that is going on very right now.
Presently KGS usually runs around 800-1200 people on average (barring major event / tournament / KGS+ Lecture / etc). It will vary with time of day. For a big event it may be 1800-2000 people. It is down a bit from it's peak, but that's generally been attributed to the HnG fad passing as participation in Western go in general has dropped off in recent years.
The growth of bots has been a mixed blessing for finding pairings, because if you want to play a bot there is almost always one there to play. This means that players just looking for a game who aren't picky may often be paired with a bot (reducing the pool for players who specifically want to play a human). In the past you may have had 3-4 people in the low to mid-dan level waiting for a game, but now they can just play a bot and you may have 1 left.
From my experience doing random data sampling in the past, automatch usually seems to account for about 20% of the games played in the "well populated" ranks (15k-3d)
-
Boidhre
- Oza
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Boidhre
- Location: Ireland
- Has thanked: 661 times
- Been thanked: 442 times
Re: kgs html client
A lot of people seem to avoid automatch, for various reasons, mostly so they can pick their opponent from what I can tell.
- RBerenguel
- Gosei
- Posts: 1585
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:44 am
- Rank: KGS 5k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: RBerenguel
- Tygem: rberenguel
- Wbaduk: JohnKeats
- Kaya handle: RBerenguel
- Online playing schedule: KGS on Saturday I use to be online, but I can be if needed from 20-23 GMT+1
- Location: Barcelona, Spain (GMT+1)
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 298 times
- Contact:
Re: kgs html client
Boidhre wrote:A lot of people seem to avoid automatch, for various reasons, mostly so they can pick their opponent from what I can tell.
So far in blitz mode I only need to wait between 1 and 5 minutes for a game. Granted, sometimes it is against the same player I had in the previous game, but I've found no problems with automatch, never waiting more than 10 minutes. Of course, I'd never wait more than 10 minutes for a game either, but I think so far this has only happened once. I rather prefer automatch games, so I do not pick the player but are given one at random, actually.
Geek of all trades, master of none: the motto for my blog mostlymaths.net
-
Boidhre
- Oza
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Boidhre
- Location: Ireland
- Has thanked: 661 times
- Been thanked: 442 times
Re: kgs html client
RBerenguel wrote:Boidhre wrote:A lot of people seem to avoid automatch, for various reasons, mostly so they can pick their opponent from what I can tell.
So far in blitz mode I only need to wait between 1 and 5 minutes for a game. Granted, sometimes it is against the same player I had in the previous game, but I've found no problems with automatch, never waiting more than 10 minutes. Of course, I'd never wait more than 10 minutes for a game either, but I think so far this has only happened once. I rather prefer automatch games, so I do not pick the player but are given one at random, actually.
I've had quite a few waits longer than 10 minutes in the 6-12k range with slow time settings. I normally go +/- 2 stones though, which might have something to do with it.
- RBerenguel
- Gosei
- Posts: 1585
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:44 am
- Rank: KGS 5k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: RBerenguel
- Tygem: rberenguel
- Wbaduk: JohnKeats
- Kaya handle: RBerenguel
- Online playing schedule: KGS on Saturday I use to be online, but I can be if needed from 20-23 GMT+1
- Location: Barcelona, Spain (GMT+1)
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 298 times
- Contact:
Re: kgs html client
Boidhre wrote:RBerenguel wrote:Boidhre wrote:A lot of people seem to avoid automatch, for various reasons, mostly so they can pick their opponent from what I can tell.
So far in blitz mode I only need to wait between 1 and 5 minutes for a game. Granted, sometimes it is against the same player I had in the previous game, but I've found no problems with automatch, never waiting more than 10 minutes. Of course, I'd never wait more than 10 minutes for a game either, but I think so far this has only happened once. I rather prefer automatch games, so I do not pick the player but are given one at random, actually.
I've had quite a few waits longer than 10 minutes in the 6-12k range with slow time settings. I normally go +/- 2 stones though, which might have something to do with it.
Oh, yes. I had to raise to ±4 for this, and have been tempted to raise it a notch more to ±5.
Geek of all trades, master of none: the motto for my blog mostlymaths.net
-
Boidhre
- Oza
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Boidhre
- Location: Ireland
- Has thanked: 661 times
- Been thanked: 442 times
Re: kgs html client
RBerenguel wrote:Oh, yes. I had to raise to ±4 for this, and have been tempted to raise it a notch more to ±5.
I never get to play even or near even games at the club so when I log onto KGS I feel like scratching that itch rather than giving or taking 4+ stones as is more usual for me over the board.
- oren
- Oza
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: oren
- Tygem: oren740, orenl
- IGS: oren
- Wbaduk: oren
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Has thanked: 251 times
- Been thanked: 549 times
Re: kgs html client
Boidhre wrote:I never get to play even or near even games at the club so when I log onto KGS I feel like scratching that itch rather than giving or taking 4+ stones as is more usual for me over the board.
At 2-3k, I do +-1 and usually get a match in a couple min. If any longer, I try a different server.
Lately having to switch has been rare though. It may be time zone difference as well. Lots of automatch players when I'm playing are using Japanese client.
-
Boidhre
- Oza
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Boidhre
- Location: Ireland
- Has thanked: 661 times
- Been thanked: 442 times
Re: kgs html client
oren wrote:Boidhre wrote:I never get to play even or near even games at the club so when I log onto KGS I feel like scratching that itch rather than giving or taking 4+ stones as is more usual for me over the board.
At 2-3k, I do +-1 and usually get a match in a couple min. If any longer, I try a different server.
Lately having to switch has been rare though. It may be time zone difference as well. Lots of automatch players when I'm playing are using Japanese client.
You may be right, I don't have much to any free time during "European Prime Time" but often try and get some sleep before the US community really gets going.