Bill Spight wrote:I find amusing the implication that adherence to professional norms of behavior depends upon being paid to do so.
Yes. If paying people guaranteed professional behavior, everyone would do it!
Bill Spight wrote:I find amusing the implication that adherence to professional norms of behavior depends upon being paid to do so.

saitama wrote:How can you preempt him? Last time I checked, you're not an admin and you can't stop him from posting things here, so unless you count insulting his grammar preempting then I think it's safe to say you're just being rude unnecessarily.
DrStraw wrote:saitama wrote:How can you preempt him? Last time I checked, you're not an admin and you can't stop him from posting things here, so unless you count insulting his grammar preempting then I think it's safe to say you're just being rude unnecessarily.
Rather curious that you registered your account one minute before your first post and that all three posts are in this thread. You must be a speed reader to have digested the entire thread in one minute and decided what to reply.
Of course, it is always possible that you could have read it in advance. By the way, have you noticed that the original poster did not post in this thread since you joined?
RBerenguel wrote:DrStraw wrote:saitama wrote:How can you preempt him? Last time I checked, you're not an admin and you can't stop him from posting things here, so unless you count insulting his grammar preempting then I think it's safe to say you're just being rude unnecessarily.
Rather curious that you registered your account one minute before your first post and that all three posts are in this thread. You must be a speed reader to have digested the entire thread in one minute and decided what to reply.
Of course, it is always possible that you could have read it in advance. By the way, have you noticed that the original poster did not post in this thread since you joined?
It's unlikely. The OP clearly ignores most punctuation and apostrophe use, whereas saitama does follow proper rules (even using the odd-looking but IIRC completely correct "it'll".)
DrStraw wrote:saitama wrote:How can you preempt him? Last time I checked, you're not an admin and you can't stop him from posting things here, so unless you count insulting his grammar preempting then I think it's safe to say you're just being rude unnecessarily.
Rather curious that you registered your account one minute before your first post and that all three posts are in this thread. You must be a speed reader to have digested the entire thread in one minute and decided what to reply.
Of course, it is always possible that you could have read it in advance. By the way, have you noticed that the original poster did not post in this thread since you joined?
mhlepore wrote:Rule #1: When you realize you are in a hole, stop digging.
Rule #2: Try to realize when you are in a hole as quickly as possible.
These are good rules in Go. Also can have value in chat room discussions. And dealing with KGS admins.
Splatted wrote:I actually used to go to the beach just so I dig holes and sit in them. Is that not normal?
made me do some research … enjoymhlepore wrote:[..] a hole [..]