Indeed, it is an open question if "all possible examples" and "known examples" are the same set. It is not quite so tough because examples fall into shape classes, which fall into classes of same cyclic behaviours. Nevertheless, until all possible shape classes will be revealed, it is an ongoing research field with the possibility of a need for updating the ko definition.
Currently, for the first time in history, the current definition is more powerful than our shape knowledge. Prior to my definition, we had not understood the common aspects of all know shapes well, except in an informal sense of "for some unclear reason being worth fighting about avoiding repetition".
Without definition destinguishing ko examples from examples that are not ko is done by appoximative understanding of what is - currently or possibly later during a game - for some unclear reason being worth fighting about avoiding repetition. Such comes from imagining representative ko fights happening about the shapes assumed to be ko. If there are examples for such ko fights in certain conceivable positional contexts, we perceive the thing as a ko. So this is a sort of (still ambiguous) implicit definition.
EDITED
How can a definition be false?
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
-
quantumf
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:36 pm
- Rank: 3d
- GD Posts: 422
- KGS: komi
- Has thanked: 180 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
This thread seems to be about the interpretation of the English word "definition." Robert, since you've already compared your work to the general theory of relativity, why not call it a theory of ko, rather than a definition of ko?
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
Re: How can a definition be false?
Currently, the definition is the most important part of the theory. The theory can, in principle, be expanded by a complete classification of all shapes / positions / sequences and proving the sketched proposition. This is a research topic for the following decades or centuries to complete the theory of ko.
-
Pippen
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:34 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: 2d
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
All u talking about are issues of convention. There is no definition or well-define-ness in itself. You can agree to use those words loosely, strictly, with a teleologic purpose, .... All that matter is: 1) all know what is talked about and 2) the consequences are not absurd or contradictory (because that would render the definition either as false or as a false-maker).
My two cents....
Edit: Sorry, too much investment...gotta substract one cent, thx^^.
My two cents....
Edit: Sorry, too much investment...gotta substract one cent, thx^^.
Last edited by Pippen on Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
A ko is when you can take and take back forever.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
skydyr
- Oza
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: skydyr
- Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
- Location: DC
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
Playing on an actual board, the farther away you get from traditional ko to various types of superko and other repeating positions, the harder it is to remember when you are obligated to break the cycle and when you can play through it.tentano wrote:What if the ko rule is simply "do not recreate a previous position"?
Does that really cause seemingly unjust outcomes?
-
tentano
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:36 am
- Rank: kgs 4k
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
Sure, but how likely is it really that you become stuck in, say, a 30-move repeating cycle?
Most of the infinite loops I've seen were under 10 moves, with the vast majority being about a simple ko.
It doesn't seem like something that's realistically a factor for amateur play, and pros would most definitely notice.
Most of the infinite loops I've seen were under 10 moves, with the vast majority being about a simple ko.
It doesn't seem like something that's realistically a factor for amateur play, and pros would most definitely notice.
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
Re: How can a definition be false?
Great. I hope you can recall and share it. Already your quadruple ko stones have been a tough exercise.Matti wrote:I remember seeing a shape where a group of five stones gets repeatedly captured.
Apply the definition to detect any kos in a given situation.tentano wrote:What if the ko rule is simply "do not recreate a previous position"?
-
Matti
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:05 pm
- Rank: 5 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
I think I have it in my bookshelf.RobertJasiek wrote:Great. I hope you can recall and share it. Already your quadruple ko stones have been a tough exercise.Matti wrote:I remember seeing a shape where a group of five stones gets repeatedly captured.
Matti
-
tentano
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:36 am
- Rank: kgs 4k
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
Case number 1:
Obviously, retaking now cannot happen under my rule, because an earlier position would be revisited. Playing some stones elsewhere allows it to be retaken, because this position is not the same as diagram 1.
That takes care of the simplest case.
Case number 2:
this is just silly in real life, but we're in theory here. Black cannot play at a, because that recreates diagram 4. Black can play 5, because diagram 4 is not recreated.
I explicitly refuse to consider including things like how many captures there are, whose turn it is or other game state data which you cannot see expressed on the board's intersections.
I think adding such details just makes my idea overcomplicated and unfit for purpose.
That also means there are no special cases which need special descriptions. I would like to see some complicated cases, where my idea actually affects the outcome.
Especially if the changed outcome is perceived as less fair somehow.
Obviously, retaking now cannot happen under my rule, because an earlier position would be revisited. Playing some stones elsewhere allows it to be retaken, because this position is not the same as diagram 1.
That takes care of the simplest case.
Case number 2:
this is just silly in real life, but we're in theory here. Black cannot play at a, because that recreates diagram 4. Black can play 5, because diagram 4 is not recreated.
I explicitly refuse to consider including things like how many captures there are, whose turn it is or other game state data which you cannot see expressed on the board's intersections.
I think adding such details just makes my idea overcomplicated and unfit for purpose.
That also means there are no special cases which need special descriptions. I would like to see some complicated cases, where my idea actually affects the outcome.
Especially if the changed outcome is perceived as less fair somehow.
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
Re: How can a definition be false?
tentano, all fine and well, but what is the point of your discussion of positional superko here? Do you want to express any relation to the topic of this thread, or do you just share my preference for this rule when used as a rule in an ordinary ruleset?
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
OK, let's continue your second example.tentano wrote: Case number 2:
this is just silly in real life, but we're in theory here. Black cannot play at a, because that recreates diagram 4. Black can play 5, because diagram 4 is not recreated.
I explicitly refuse to consider including things like how many captures there are, whose turn it is or other game state data which you cannot see expressed on the board's intersections.
I think adding such details just makes my idea overcomplicated and unfit for purpose.
That also means there are no special cases which need special descriptions. I would like to see some complicated cases, where my idea actually affects the outcome.
Especially if the changed outcome is perceived as less fair somehow.
and 
indicate "ko" threat and reply.
= passNow White cannot capture, because that would recreate the position after
in diagram B 7.Many, if not most, go players regard that as a problem.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.