How can a definition be false?

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
tentano
Lives in gote
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:36 am
Rank: kgs 4k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: How can a definition be false?

Post by tentano »

Assuming that white is somehow forced to pass, how is it unfair that black wins the ko?

Isn't it by that very same logic unfair that black is forced to endure a seki or a loss under other rules?

As far as I know fairness doesn't naturally accumulate to either colour.

What is the problem that is being regarded, here?
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: How can a definition be false?

Post by Bill Spight »

tentano wrote:Assuming that white is somehow forced to pass, how is it unfair that black wins the ko?

Isn't it by that very same logic unfair that black is forced to endure a seki or a loss under other rules?

As far as I know fairness doesn't naturally accumulate to either colour.

What is the problem that is being regarded, here?
Basically, I think, the problem is that the corner position is regarded as a seki, not a ko. If the rules turn it into a ko, that is a problem.

To put it another way, the rules are meant to serve the players, not the players the rules.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Post Reply