Assuming that white is somehow forced to pass, how is it unfair that black wins the ko?
Isn't it by that very same logic unfair that black is forced to endure a seki or a loss under other rules?
As far as I know fairness doesn't naturally accumulate to either colour.
What is the problem that is being regarded, here?
How can a definition be false?
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: How can a definition be false?
Basically, I think, the problem is that the corner position is regarded as a seki, not a ko. If the rules turn it into a ko, that is a problem.tentano wrote:Assuming that white is somehow forced to pass, how is it unfair that black wins the ko?
Isn't it by that very same logic unfair that black is forced to endure a seki or a loss under other rules?
As far as I know fairness doesn't naturally accumulate to either colour.
What is the problem that is being regarded, here?
To put it another way, the rules are meant to serve the players, not the players the rules.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.