Learning curves

General conversations about Go belong here.
Post Reply
Cynosure
Dies in gote
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:21 am
Rank: KGS 5 kyu
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Cynosure
Been thanked: 1 time

Learning curves

Post by Cynosure »

I tend to notice that when I learn a new topic, or on the verge of a new breakthrough, playstyle, et. al. I tend to lose a few stones in strength before effectively solidifying my play again. Anyone else do this? I know it's better for me in the long run, but it's still very frustrating to consistently lose games by 10 points or less...
alejo
Lives with ko
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 4:10 am
Rank: KGS 5 kyu
GD Posts: 442
KGS: alejo
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Learning curves

Post by alejo »

Learning go has its ups and downs and, in fact, when we are learning something we tend to lose a few stones till we effectively use it.
"read a book, lose two stones" is a proverb over here (I don't think it was in asian tradition BTW).

You may want to check this post: http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/835-how-do-go-players-think-of-themselves.html

You'll experience this bumps all over your go career...
My blog about Go and Boardgames: Alejo's Tenuki
User avatar
joellercoaster
Lives with ko
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:50 am
Rank: OGS 2k
GD Posts: 0
OGS: Joellercoaster
Location: London
Has thanked: 288 times
Been thanked: 65 times
Contact:

Re: Learning curves

Post by joellercoaster »

alejo wrote:“They play something different, with the same rules, but a different game” was my reaction to the first pro game I saw. I guess I still haven’t got over it.


I really liked ths quote in your blog. For me it actually sums up what I love so much about Go: there are so many games within it. The only way to discover them is to improve, get stronger, understand my own thinking so I can realise the next layer of play/understanding. Then I start to see the shape of a new game.

It's amazing, and I guess for an amateur, it will keep happening forever.
Confucius in the Analects says "even playing go is better than eating chips in front of tv all day." -- kivi
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

Cynosure wrote:to consistently lose games by 10 points or less...
If:
  • you play serious, reasonably timed, rated games, and
  • all your opponents' ratings are fairly accurate (say, solid KGS 9k), and
  • you consistently lose many more games to them than wins,
then, maybe your current rating (say 9k) is over-rated;
and you'll eventually drop to 10k or lower.
Until your win/loss ratio reaches ~50/50.

( And vice versa, of course. )

At the same time, yes, sometimes we do experience an apparent "dip" before we reach a higher level.

Only time can tell.
tentano
Lives in gote
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:36 am
Rank: kgs 4k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Learning curves

Post by tentano »

If you're only losing by around ten points most of the time, you're probably just unlucky.

I do experience that if I'm working hard to improve, my playing becomes unsure, experimental and initially very vulnerable to people without such weak feelings.

Just think of all the sweet revenge you will get when your improvement kicks in.
User avatar
S2W
Lives with ko
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2014 9:22 pm
Rank: IGS 6k
GD Posts: 0
IGS: S2W
Wbaduk: stuw
DGS: S2w
OGS: S2W
Online playing schedule: IGS & DGS most nights
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Learning curves

Post by S2W »

Cynosure wrote: I know it's better for me in the long run, but it's still very frustrating to consistently lose games by 10 points or less...

I know the frustration well - I was on a similar streak of close losses. I found that mentally it helped to go back over my games and see where/if I could have picked up the points. Studying endgame a bit more also helped. Counting during my games helps also (well it definitely does when I remember to do it ;) ).

Re learning new things - I know I often am tempted to try something out as soon as I've learned it. In go though every rule or pattern comes with the caveat that context matters. The problem is that while you may have learned the new rule trick etc. you usually have no idea of the proper context to apply it. Sometimes this is an obvious thing - you try a play and find it doesn't work because of a random stone that wasn't in the memorized sequence. But other times it might be more subtle - you normally play solid but the cool new move is faster but leaves weaknesses that you don't know how to handle. For these more subtle cases, it can be difficult to recognize the reason why you are not doing better despite "improving" your game.

Finally, it's often easy to see a winning streak as a sign of improvement a loosing streak as a sign of getting weaker. The reality is though that learning one new factoid is only going to improve your winning chances by a few percent at best and that really you won't see the improvement in the next game or two but in the next 100 or so.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Learning curves

Post by Bill Spight »

As the saying goes, It ain't what you don't know, it's what you know that ain't so.

Often advancement requires unlearning bad habits. Doing so can leave us at a loss, and lead to lost games, until we learn new and better habits. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Post Reply