Kirby wrote:Bill Spight wrote:But which of your reading skills need development?
From what I gather from your advice, I would think that the following areas need improvement:
1.) I should consider a wider set of moves. If it is true that I am subject to reinforcing bad moves, then perhaps it's because of using this depth first search instead of breadth first search.
Oh, I don't think that you are reinforcing bad moves. Your choice of candidate moves to explore will be good, even if you miss the best play. Occasionally you will try a bad move, like everybody else.

But for effective use of your time and effort, how good is your choice of candidate plays? Suppose that you play over a professional game, at each move choosing the five best candidate plays. (You are not trying to guess the pro's move, but are just picking what you think are the five best plays to explore.) Very often the pro's move should be among your candidates, even if it is not the best play. How often do you miss it? You can test this out with GoGoD's GoScorer software, among others, or even do it yourself. The positions where you miss the pro moves are often good ones to study.

Now in a real game you may not always explore five candidates; sometimes you may explore more (edit: and sometimes fewer), depending upon the position. You may also read out the play locally in different areas, even if you do not plan to play there now. (I used to do that as a bad habit when I was a DDK, before I started playing the whole board. After that I kept doing it, since it usually came in handy later.

)
As for patience, I have a couple of thoughts, but I don't know if they apply to you. When I was just learning go I heard that Japanese pros advocated studying go positions for the truth about them, not just with an eye to winning the game. That attitude requires patience, and helps to develop it.

Some years ago I played a demonstration game against Nam Chihyung, a replay endgame with coupons. I lost by 2 points. Each play session took about one hour, with a late lunch in between. I was not used to the intensity of the game, in part because my reading was inefficient, as Magicwand says. But the real difference, I felt, came in the second session.
I sensed that she had learned more about the position during the first session than I had. Approaching games as learning opportunities, win or lose, helps to develop an objective eye and emotional control.
Now, in your case I have surmised that you are too eager to butt heads with your opponents, and that indicates a certain impatience. You can judge whether that is true or not, or to what degree it is so. It may also be that you see your opponent's territory as bigger than it is. If so, that is a different, but related problem. Developing an objective eye can help with it.