Keeping track of L&D study results

Talk about improving your game, resources you like, games you played, etc.
User avatar
Koosh
Lives with ko
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:26 pm
Rank: AGA 2 dan
GD Posts: 54
Location: Raleigh, NC
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 53 times
Contact:

Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Koosh »

I don't know if a dedicated conversation has been held here before on this topic. If so, please link me to it. :salute:

I've been thinking and trying to come up with a single most efficient way of tracking my study of life and death. As I know it, reviewing problems that one has gotten wrong a number of times in a timed manner is ideal. This also leads to "hard-wiring" - a term that I've read elsewhere in L19.

The problem I face is that which comes from reading too many books at once. When I put one down for too long and try to come back to it, I lose track of the sense I had of how much of the book I've completed and I become extremely tempted to just start from the beginning again.

When you are studying Life and Death problems from a book, how do you keep track of your progress? Do you mark your attempts directly in the book? Do you date those attempts? Do you review the book in full afterward, pulling problems marked wrong, or do you keep a separate notebook? What do you write in that notebook?
Ko is the best solution.
With Ko, I can keep eating and drinking until I am full.

Visit >>>Koosh's Study Journal<<<
jeromie
Lives in sente
Posts: 902
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:12 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: jeromie
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Has thanked: 319 times
Been thanked: 287 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by jeromie »

I typically face the same problem, but in a few problem heavy books I have used some light pencil marks to indicate whether I got a problem I attempted right or wrong. This is a nice way to keep track of my progress, and I don't find it too distracting when I return to the book.
DrStraw
Oza
Posts: 2180
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 662 times
Contact:

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by DrStraw »

The simple answer is that I never did keep track. I just did the problems and then hopefully saw the results when I was able to apply them in a game. Bottom line is that it does not matter what happens during your study if you cannot apply it when it is needed.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).
jeromie
Lives in sente
Posts: 902
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:12 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: jeromie
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Has thanked: 319 times
Been thanked: 287 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by jeromie »

I just thought of something else to add. I've recently been working through The Endgame by Tomoko Ogawa and James Davies. In chapter 2 of that book, there are a set of problems where the authors ask you to keep score by evaluating how many points each move is worth. Even though they provide space in the book to write your answers, I didn't want to ruin my ability to try the problems again on subsequent read-through. So I made a bookmark that allowed me to score the problems.

You could do something similar for life and death problems if you don't want to write in your books. You could even keep the bookmarks if you want to compare your performance on subsequent readings of the book.
Attachments
Endgame Bookmark.pdf
(14.49 KiB) Downloaded 685 times
Kirby
Honinbo
Posts: 9553
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Has thanked: 1583 times
Been thanked: 1707 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Kirby »

If you want stuff repeated based on time, you can use Anki.

that's not how I do problems, though. I just start at the beginning and go through it. If a problem is too hard, I mean might told the page corner and move on.
be immersed
User avatar
Koosh
Lives with ko
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:26 pm
Rank: AGA 2 dan
GD Posts: 54
Location: Raleigh, NC
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 53 times
Contact:

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Koosh »

@DrStraw: I've also done just this to get to 1D. I went through problem books and then promptly forget about them. When the goal is to get 95% right before moving on - which seems to be a key aspect of the training required to become a high dan player - then I need to find a way to effectively track and evaluate progress.

@jeromie: I appreciate you posting this bookmark! I remember studying my way through that chapter. I need to reread this book. I first read it when I was 20k and gained little from it. The second time I read it (SDK), it blew my mind. Maybe I can use this next time I read through it.

@Kirby: I like Anki, but I don't like the time requirement needed to build cards. More importantly, if my inherent problem is that I put books down for a time and then forget where I am with them, then forgetting to do Anki daily is going to put me in the same situation.

I have an idea of how I want to do this moving forward, but I want to see if anyone else has a systematic way that they study L&D.

Here's my idea.
1) Set up an Evernote account - this allows me to access the note from a computer or smartphone whenever I want/wherever I am.
2) Create a note for each book; list the publication details.
3) Write: First Attempt Start Date: ______, First Attempt % Correct: ______, First Attempt Problems Incorrect ______.
3) Use a list to create numbers (1,2,3,4,5....)
4) Mark an "o" next to problems I get right, and an "x" next to those I don't
5) Finish the problem set, total up the percentage
7) Mark next to the first mark for consequent attempts (oo, ox, xo, xx) (ooo, oxo, ect.)

Something like this: http://www.evernote.com/l/AMgOl16HMCNLR ... PaoitM_Ks/
Ko is the best solution.
With Ko, I can keep eating and drinking until I am full.

Visit >>>Koosh's Study Journal<<<
DrStraw
Oza
Posts: 2180
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 662 times
Contact:

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by DrStraw »

Koosh wrote:@DrStraw: I've also done just this to get to 1D. I went through problem books and then promptly forget about them. When the goal is to get 95% right before moving on - which seems to be a key aspect of the training required to become a high dan player - then I need to find a way to effectively track and evaluate progress.
All I can say is that I got to 5 dan using the method. I guess it may not work for everyone.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Bill Spight »

Koosh wrote:{T}o get to 1D I went through problem books and then promptly forget about them. When the goal is to get 95% right before moving on - which seems to be a key aspect of the training required to become a high dan player - then I need to find a way to effectively track and evaluate progress.
If that is your goal you are not challenging yourself enough. A good time to move on is when you are getting more than 60% right.

OC, moving on does not mean that you do not continue to overlearn problems that you missed. Here is the overlearning approach that I use. To quote myself from another thread:
Bill Spight wrote:One learning technique that I used was overlearning, by solving problems that I had already solved. IIUC, spaced repetition is a form of overlearning.

The overlearning technique that I used works this way. Suppose that it takes N tries to a problem before success. After that you overlearn the problem by adding N/2 more successes. I kept track of successes by Xs and failures by check marks. (I also crossed through a check mark to make an X, after the first success.) Sometimes I waited so long between repetitions that I failed on problems that I had succeeded on before. ;)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Kirby
Honinbo
Posts: 9553
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Has thanked: 1583 times
Been thanked: 1707 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Kirby »

I don't understand the idea of getting only 60% right. If a problem is too hard for me, maybe I don't get the answer yet, but I don't somehow think the wrong answer is right (usually).

I would say that my accuracy rate is high for even difficult problems, because I don't think I'm done attempting before I have pretty high confidence that there are no refutations.

When you say 60% correct, do you mean that you never thought you had the answer for 40% of them?
be immersed
jeromie
Lives in sente
Posts: 902
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:12 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: jeromie
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Has thanked: 319 times
Been thanked: 287 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by jeromie »

I don't know about Bill, but I get problems wrong sometimes. This can be because of lazy reading (i.e. with more time or focus I would have realized my answer was wrong - I should eliminate these kinds of error, since they lead to lazy reading in games) or an honest oversight. It also occurs because I can have different aims with different problem sets: sometimes I practice exhaustive reading, and sometimes I work through problems to expose myself to new ideas. With the latter purpose, spending a large amount of time to make sure I have an individual problem correct can be counterproductive since I am exposed to fewer ideas.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Bill Spight »

Kirby wrote:I don't understand the idea of getting only 60% right. If a problem is too hard for me, maybe I don't get the answer yet, but I don't somehow think the wrong answer is right (usually).

I would say that my accuracy rate is high for even difficult problems, because I don't think I'm done attempting before I have pretty high confidence that there are no refutations.

When you say 60% correct, do you mean that you never thought you had the answer for 40% of them?
Give yourself a time limit. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Bill Spight »

jeromie wrote:I don't know about Bill, but I get problems wrong sometimes.
Me, too. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Kirby
Honinbo
Posts: 9553
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Has thanked: 1583 times
Been thanked: 1707 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Kirby »

Hmm. I don't feel comfortable looking at the answer if I haven't solved it. Of course, I have no proof of the best method.
be immersed
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Bill Spight »

Kirby wrote:Hmm. I don't feel comfortable looking at the answer if I haven't solved it. Of course, I have no proof of the best method.
You don't have to look. If you have not solved the problem within the time limit, it counts as a failure. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Kirby
Honinbo
Posts: 9553
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Has thanked: 1583 times
Been thanked: 1707 times

Re: Keeping track of L&D study results

Post by Kirby »

Bill Spight wrote:
You don't have to look. If you have not solved the problem within the time limit, it counts as a failure. :)
Sure. That's what I meant when I was asking about this:
Kirby wrote: When you say 60% correct, do you mean that you never thought you had the answer for 40% of them?
be immersed
Post Reply