Zen19K 8d -- now with Value Net

For discussing go computing, software announcements, etc.
johnsmith
Lives with ko
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 3:55 am
Rank: KGS 6 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Zen19K 8d -- now with Value Net

Post by johnsmith »

yoyoma wrote:Here is the server people are talking about: http://www.yss-aya.com/cgos/19x19/standings.html
Zen 12.5's results: http://www.yss-aya.com/cgos/19x19/cross ... -1c0g.html

12.5 is 17 wins 16 losses to 12.4, so I don't think you can say it's weaker. 12.4 uses the same naming "1c0g", so I guess they are using the same hardware. If you're going by ratings, 12.5 is a little below 12.4 but it's just because 12.5 hasn't played enough games yet. Probably it's rating will get closer to 12.4 after some more games.
Maybe it was wrong to say weaker, but their policy nets are of a very similar strength. When I was reviewing their games, all those moves seemed very good. But I guess, as you said, they need to play many more games in order to have some statistically relevant analysis. As of this moment v12.5 has less than 50% winrate against v12.4, though it's "just" 1c0g hardware.
User avatar
mschribr
Beginner
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:49 am
GD Posts: 5
Location: inner solar system
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Zen19K 8d -- now with Value Net

Post by mschribr »

Krama wrote:Why is zen not playing on KGS anymore?
Why should Zen play on KGS? Zen is already number 1 on KGS. Zen should play stronger players. Which servers have stronger players? Can Zen play in human tournaments?
pookpooi
Lives in sente
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:26 pm
GD Posts: 10
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Zen19K 8d -- now with Value Net

Post by pookpooi »

In Bayesian Elo page that updated daily instead of real time, 12.5 is now 'slicely' better than 12.4 from 398 games (as I'm writing this 12.5 has played 402 games) http://www.yss-aya.com/cgos/19x19/bayes.html

Anyway, it's interesting that Zen seems struck at the level around AlphaGo v13. Maybe what DeepMind did to AlphaGo from v.13 to v.18 (to now) is like a secret sauce (main dish is Nature paper). Surprise me, Yamato ;)
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Zen19K 8d -- now with Value Net

Post by Uberdude »

I wouldn't say "stuck" when it doesn't get stronger over 2 weeks and a minor version release... Yes I expect diminishing returns, but I see no reason for pessimism over Zen's remarkable rate of improvement yet.
User avatar
ez4u
Oza
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
Rank: Jp 6 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: ez4u
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 2351 times
Been thanked: 1332 times

Re: Zen19K 8d -- now with Value Net

Post by ez4u »

pookpooi wrote:In Bayesian Elo page that updated daily instead of real time, 12.5 is now 'slicely' better than 12.4 from 398 games (as I'm writing this 12.5 has played 402 games) http://www.yss-aya.com/cgos/19x19/bayes.html

Anyway, it's interesting that Zen seems struck at the level around AlphaGo v13. Maybe what DeepMind did to AlphaGo from v.13 to v.18 (to now) is like a secret sauce (main dish is Nature paper). Surprise me, Yamato ;)
I am not up to date on everything that has been published. Is the Zen = AlphaGo v13 claim based on anything other than hand waving by the AlphaGo team?
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Zen19K 8d -- now with Value Net

Post by Uberdude »

It's probably somewhat based on the way it beat up a load of KGS 9 dans (who are probably around or even above Fan Hui's level), though this does come with the online fast game caveat.
Post Reply