When to attach?
-
TofuPython
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:37 pm
- Rank: 14 Kyu OGS
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: TofuPython
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
When to attach?
Is there a rule of thumb when one should attach to an opponent's stones? I know it's supposed to make both players stronger when you attach, but besides that I'm not too sure.
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6272
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
Re: When to attach?
There are different reasons for good attachment:
- forcing a preferred direction
- mutual fair settling
- defense of weak stones by attaching already strong opponent's stones
- if efficiency is greater than in the case of non-attachment
- test move
- only successful tactical solution to given aims
etc.
- forcing a preferred direction
- mutual fair settling
- defense of weak stones by attaching already strong opponent's stones
- if efficiency is greater than in the case of non-attachment
- test move
- only successful tactical solution to given aims
etc.
-
DrStraw
- Oza
- Posts: 2180
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
- Rank: AGA 5d
- GD Posts: 4312
- Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
- Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
- Has thanked: 237 times
- Been thanked: 662 times
- Contact:
Re: When to attach?
A good rule at your level is to only attach when you are trying to save your stones and need to make shape quickly. Never attach when attacking unless you can read out that it achieves what you want.
Of course, as you get stronger you will discover that there are exceptions to this rule, as there are with any rule. And I would recommend breaking the rule just so that you see what happens.
Of course, as you get stronger you will discover that there are exceptions to this rule, as there are with any rule. And I would recommend breaking the rule just so that you see what happens.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).