EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859 Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pmGD Posts: 312Location: Santa Barbara, CAHas thanked: 349 times Been thanked: 2070 times
Post
by EdLee Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:08 am
Hi Intrepid,
I've completely forgotten about this game.
Quite a bit has happened since 2012 ( in both Go and non-Go areas
).
Let me go back and review the game from the start --
I just looked at my hidden notes for my first few moves,
and they seem to be all news to me !
Let me take a look first... and I'll decide if I should contnue...
Thanks.
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859 Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pmGD Posts: 312Location: Santa Barbara, CAHas thanked: 349 times Been thanked: 2070 times
Post
by EdLee Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:05 pm
Catching up...
After a quick glance of one of John's recent big list of books,
maybe I'd play
slightly differently:
$$B
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$B
Not so crazy about
. Maybe...
$$W
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$W$$W
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$W
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859 Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pmGD Posts: 312Location: Santa Barbara, CAHas thanked: 349 times Been thanked: 2070 times
Post
by EdLee Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:27 pm
Catching up...
Big miss ?
$$W
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$W
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859 Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pmGD Posts: 312Location: Santa Barbara, CAHas thanked: 349 times Been thanked: 2070 times
Post
by EdLee Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:36 pm
Catching up...
Maybe
-
(
-
) was OK,
but
and
probably bad -- force W to a lot of cash,
with little profit for B.
Instead of
, maybe jump in somehow... ?
$$W
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$W
( 
- 
) was OK,
and 
probably bad -- force W to a lot of cash,