Kirby wrote:dsatkas wrote:Why do people feel the need to elevate the importance of go in such ways?
Because we like go
That's irrelevant. You are seeing what you want to see.
Kirby wrote:dsatkas wrote:Why do people feel the need to elevate the importance of go in such ways?
Because we like go
dsatkas wrote:Kirby wrote:dsatkas wrote:Why do people feel the need to elevate the importance of go in such ways?
Because we like go
That's irrelevant. You are seeing what you want to see.
nope. for 2 reasons: monty and duckie existed decades before Aliffe nought, which, along with fiddling with molecular bonds or anything that comes in combinations, is just one of a gerzillion examples of a familiar phenomenon: a solution looking for problems, instead of a problem looking for solutions. expect more candy floss about monteduck for a few more years, until they kill a few more people with inappropriate synthetic medicines or duckie bombs that have a 63% chance of hitting their target, miss by a mile, and hit Washington instead.porky wrote:Is this count?
Uberdude wrote:Given the topic, I thought people might like the pattern on the facade of the newly opened Cambridge North railway station
Code: Select all
.XX.X.X....X........XX.X.X.XXXX
~...X.X.XXXX.XXXXXXX...X.X..XX
XXX.X..XX...XXXXX..XXX.X.X.
X..X.X...XX.XXX..X.X..X.X
.XX.X.XX....X..XX.X.XX.
...X....XXXX.X...X...
XXX.XXX.XX..X.XXX.X
X...X.....XX..X..
.XXX.XXXX...XX.
.X...XX..XX..
X.XX...X...
....XXX.X
XXX.X..
X..X.
.XX
.