Agreed!johnsmith wrote:9x9 is really puzzling.
It is the RAVE value. See here:pnprog wrote:And the enigmatic R% value for 9x9 or 13x13.
Maybe there can be a 'save as' option to keep the comments only for the main variation. File as such probably wouldn't be that large. And keep all other comments in the original app. Or just say "W=..., MC=..., VN=..." so the file will definitely be smaller. Some people suggested a toggle for various stuff, too. Just like in Leela with 3 colors. And I just hope it is not a violation of copyright, right? When you have visual representation of the game you can easily notice which move was wrong and specifically analyze that one. When I briefly see difference between two moves with evals like 55.xy and 56.xy I immediately think it's not a bad move, but it may be almost 2% difference (56.99-55.01). Thanks you fore your comments. Redditors are right to say that it could be improved. In fact, all the comments from Leela for all variations are duplicated for each move of the variation... this is redundant, and so useless. You can see it if you open a rsgf file using a standard sgf editor (rename the file from *.rsgf to *.sgf).johnsmith wrote:Players on reddit have noticed that a completed file was 2.3mb large and as such can't be uploaded to websites for online review. I am not a programmer myself but I have awful lot of ideas
My other idea is to have a graph in the app, below the left board for example, that will show you graphically where the game went wrong. Sgf will be smaller that way. I hope pngprog will like this idea
The third idea is to have all those evals (Win, Monte Carlo, Value) on the left board as well. Though file will be extremely huge, but oh well
that much power allows for a lot of branches, all branches being very deep. Hahaha, it's cool seeing people doing unexpected things with GoReviewPartner 
This is apparently an issue running Ray. I forgot to mention that Ray needs CNTK to be used. CNTK can be downloaded there: https://github.com/Microsoft/CNTK/releasesThanks for the lovely tool. I enjoyed using it with Leela.
However, I could not run it with Rayon for some reason. I got the following error message:
Actually, I had already installed CNTK and was running Rayon using GPU.pnprog wrote: This is apparently an issue running Ray. I forgot to mention that Ray needs CNTK to be used. CNTK can be downloaded there: https://github.com/Microsoft/CNTK/releases
Please have a try after installing CNTK and let me know.
Good job in solving your issue and finding that bug in my python code.Tiktaalik wrote:Actually, I had already installed CNTK and was running Rayon using GPU.pnprog wrote: This is apparently an issue running Ray. I forgot to mention that Ray needs CNTK to be used. CNTK can be downloaded there: https://github.com/Microsoft/CNTK/releases
Please have a try after installing CNTK and let me know.
Anyway, I found that the main problem was that I used a wrong path to ray binary..
I compiled a couple of different versions of Rayon and then moved some of them to my archive directory, so I somehow mixed those up and used a non-existing path..
A minor thing I would like to inform you is that there was a typo and a syntax error in one of your scripts.
Specifically, in line 291 of your "ray_analysis.py", "Ray_command_line" should be "ray_command_line".
Also in this line, it seems you cannot simply use "+" sign to join error message and the ray command line, which is a list. I just borrowed a code you used in the "leela_analysis.py" and modified it as:
alert("Could not run Ray using the command from config.ini file:\n"+" ".join(ray_command_line))
This enables the GUI pop-up as you intended.
Anyway, the fact that this part of the script is triggered means that your Ray program is not running properly, so this is really a minor thing, but just so you know..
If anyone else is interested in something like this - the following Linux shell-script will read the rsgf file and plot a graph over black's win probability.johnsmith wrote: My other idea is to have a graph in the app, below the left board for example, that will show you graphically where the game went wrong.
Code: Select all
#!/bin/sh
if [ X$1 = X -o ! -f $1 ]
then
echo Need rsgf file as argument
exit 1
fi
grep -e '^C\[Move' -e '^Leela' $1 | tr '\n' ' ' | tr ']' '\n' | cut -d ' ' -f 3,11 | cut -d '%' -f1 | grep -v Move > /tmp/g.dat
gnuplot -p -e "set yrange [0:100]; plot '/tmp/g.dat' with lines"
rm -f /tmp/g.dat
Sorry if my quick-hack script offended you somehow. How about posting your code for those move-by-move oracle comparisons - it sounds cool indeed.djhbrown wrote:win% is as much a function of how bad opp's last move was as it is of how good your move was. a more meaningful indicator of where your play was deficient (according to your chosen oracle) is the difference between win% of your move and win% of your oracle's best move for that same position.
graphs are useful tools for seeing the relationship between two variables, so if you wanted to see how your performance behaves over time, a graph of win% over time would be a suitable instrument. on the other hand, colour coding of your moves would show you which of them were below par:
your move win% - oracle best move win%
< - 5% red
+- 5% green
> 5% yellow (you significantly bettered the machine)
5 is an arbitrary number; a more statistically meaningful one might be sd of the distribution of historical differences - then, over several games, you would discover whether or not you were improving. another way of judging that would be to glance at your rank graph, which will probably tell you that you are not because you fondly imagine that you only lost because you went wrong on one particular move, whereas it is your overall strategy and tactics and reading ability that are wanting because you are trying to reinvent the wheel, learning by experience of playing other weak players instead of reading a book and standing on the shoulders of wise (wo)men down the ages. alphago needed millions of trials to improve by trial and error and self-flagellation, what makes you think you are any different?