Looking at skilled go players, I can come up with some different areas that they excel at:
* Great endgame
* Fast and deep reading
* Excellent positional judgment
* Light play
These are just brainstorms that come to mind from the top of my head. So how do I improve in these areas? Some are straightforward:
* Great endgame - Study endgame problems; practice
* Fast and deep reading - study various life and death problems; maybe some difficult, some easy
* Positional judgment - practice evaluating who is ahead and/or behind
But I get stuck on light play... The best I can think of is, "try to consciously think about playing lightly". How might one improve this skill?
How to study "playing lightly"
-
Kirby
- Honinbo
- Posts: 9553
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Kirby
- Tygem: 커비라고해
- Has thanked: 1583 times
- Been thanked: 1707 times
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
mhlepore
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:52 am
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: lepore
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 128 times
Re: How to study "playing lightly"
I don't have an answer, but I do have an observation.
Your first three bullets are all objectively good things that are never at odds with our goal of playing well:
* Great endgame
* Fast and deep reading
* Excellent positional judgment
Your fourth bullet - playing lightly - is this *always* something for which one should strive? If the opposite of light is heavy, then playing lightly seems good. If the opposite of light is solid, then depending on context, I might prefer to play solid than to play light.
Question: Are stones light, or are strategies light? I don't know.
Your first three bullets are all objectively good things that are never at odds with our goal of playing well:
* Great endgame
* Fast and deep reading
* Excellent positional judgment
Your fourth bullet - playing lightly - is this *always* something for which one should strive? If the opposite of light is heavy, then playing lightly seems good. If the opposite of light is solid, then depending on context, I might prefer to play solid than to play light.
Question: Are stones light, or are strategies light? I don't know.
-
Kirby
- Honinbo
- Posts: 9553
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Kirby
- Tygem: 커비라고해
- Has thanked: 1583 times
- Been thanked: 1707 times
Re: How to study "playing lightly"
Good observation. I think that I view "playing lightly" as a strength in stronger players, because it's a skill that I seem to lack. It may not always be the best strategy, but this light and flexible way of playing is something that I'm not very good at.mhlepore wrote:I don't have an answer, but I do have an observation.
Your first three bullets are all objectively good things that are never at odds with our goal of playing well:
* Great endgame
* Fast and deep reading
* Excellent positional judgment
Your fourth bullet - playing lightly - is this *always* something for which one should strive? If the opposite of light is heavy, then playing lightly seems good. If the opposite of light is solid, then depending on context, I might prefer to play solid than to play light.
Question: Are stones light, or are strategies light? I don't know.
It may not always be a bad thing, but there are certainly times when I should probably have the ability to play lighter.
be immersed
-
jeromie
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:12 pm
- Rank: AGA 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: jeromie
- Location: Fort Collins, CO
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 287 times
Re: How to study "playing lightly"
Reviewing pro games that you feel exhibit that quality seems like a good way to train that skill. I also think you could play games with the goal of sacrificing stones. When every stone you place is a potential sacrifice, there is no reason to make groups heavy.