That being said, with Korea fielding their #1, #2, and #3 players, I would say that they are clearly the heavy favorites.
Of games in go4go Ke has 3-1 record plus Peng is lower rated so Ke is still heavy favourite
We seem to quite different interpretations here, and if you look at Ke Jie's stats even more interpretations fly off the page. We also seem to have lots of mathematicians/statisticians on this forum (nothing's perfect

)so perhaps someone can tell me how we are supposed to read stats like this. I suspect the answer is "with a salt mine full of NaCl" but still...
Some of the other stats to take into account for Ke Jie:
Against the two players who were so raved about very recently that a massively sponsored game was arranged between them (and also raved about on this forum very recently so that a huge book of the match appeared in English), Ke Jie has a massive plus: 8-0 against Gu Li and 11-3 against Yi Se-tol.
But against the players he has played more often he has much more modest scores: 11-8 vs Chen Yaoye, 10-8 against Shi Yue and 9-6 vs Tang Weixing. He even has negative scores against Qiu Jun and Jiang Weijie (not to mention Pak Cheong-hwan) and Tan Xiao has split him on 6-6.
He even has 0% against quite a few players. I'm relying on memory, but one of the features of Go Seigen's stats was that he only ever had negative scores against a very tiny number of players - much fewer than Ke Jie is recording, anyway.
So, how are we supposed to make sense of all this beyond a vague "Ke Jie seems a fairly strong player"?
In vaguely similar territory, it has long been a given among top pros that if they had to play God to save their lives, they would need four stones to feel totally confident of winning. It seems from the latest server reports that some pros are losing on four stones to a bot. Looks like pros may have got more of their understanding of the game wrong than they thought.
Never trust numbers, I say
