Vargo wrote:Golaxy wins the last game.
The 7th game is
HERE
Final score : Golaxy wins 5-2
Let's wait for another 5-10 networks, and have a rematch
fyi at least two of the games had operator "misclicks" or "error of the connector" on the LZ volunteer team side.
As well as for two of the games, LZ was only using half the hardware as Golaxy, ie 5x1080 vs galaxy's 10x gtx 1080ti
and the second to last game that it lost, LZ only used 3/10th the hardware specs of golaxy.
These matches were a farce for Golaxy PR. Its not serious and nothing more than a joke
The volunteer LZ team side was horrible unprepared, almost gross negligence if this was a job they'd be prosecuted for malpractice.
One day a game had to be delayed before a guy got stuck in traffic, another day a guy got sick and couldn't use his computer resources...
They were changing hardware specs EVERY SINGLE DAY, and during the first game also changing time settings within the one very same exact game itself.
This was probably the most blotched Go match in the 5000 history of the game.
///
and the final game was likely rigged as well, in that there was human interference that harmed LZ's play...
Code: Select all
Within the context of analysis of (potentially) bad (and/or buggy) moves of LZ, I would like to offer the following opinion, @kuba97531 I concur that I too when attempting to duplicate or replicate the results, I could not get repeat nor duplicate LZ's first move no matter which network I tried....
So
Here is my theory, since we know the following facts :
* The LZ moves are not automatically inputted into the game/match against its opponent Golaxy
* It is a manual process that requires a human hand to 'click' and input the moves
* There were on several occasions "operator misclicks" from on the volunteer LZ team side
* There was announced via translation that game 1 had an 'error of the connector' which indicated to mean possibly another human input error.
* Apparently in the games that were misclicked, the game was still able to proceed and continue, and resulted in further moves from both sides immediately after the misclick(s) took place, thus indicating that Leela Zero integrated those misclicks into its official line of play.
One can permissibly infer and/or reasonably assume from the above, given the fact that it seems multiple people cannot duplicate the first move from LZ's side in the 7th game, that it seems likely that either LZ volunteer team again 'misclicked' and/or they deliberately may have chosen to take a sort of creative liberties or creative license, if you will, by playing their own human whim / choice and overriding the LZ's engines decision, in order to then start the game off an unusual path.... (for whatever reasons that's unknown at this point since afaik they have not published the game 7 logs)
And to qualify my remarks this later /final paragraph is purely my own speculation as to one conceivable subjective justification if indeed the conjecture above is correct, due in part to the unique handicap rules in place for this match, it appears that first move in game 7 was decided by its human operators, esp since it played tengen from the start. Given the constraints that no first move could be beneath the sixth line, I find it hard to entertain the idea that Golaxy in and of itself would have chosen Tengen without human intervention. Now, since the handicap rules only specify it has to play above the fifth line for the very first move, there was no indication that this first move had to come from the engine itself and nothing that would have barred (afaik) the human operators of the Golaxy engine from picking the first move for it. Now, and this is were my guess is that perhaps it was likely the volunteer operators of the LZ team ALSO took creative liberties and took that to mean that its response to Golaxy's first move that LZ's first move could also be "hand picked" and that it did not need to be strictly engine based throughout the entirety of the game/matches. In lieu of there being an official logs published that provides evidence to the contrary, from the LZ volunteer side for the seventh match, it’s still an open question as to what exactly occurred. But given the totality of the circumstances and the aforementioned known facts proffered above, it is abundantly apparent to me that LZ's first move in game 7 was interjected improperly by human intervention.
