Jan.van.Rongen wrote:
Bojanic wrote:
Analysis window of Leela.
Please note that on bottom bar before W50 was played you can see L17 suggestion almost immediately.
...
Your "analysis window" is not an analysis window that a cheater would have used because it uses "no ponder". And (2) 3000- someting evaluation that your window shows is nothing on the GTX 960M that Carlos has. That's a fraction of a second on that machine and then it immediately continues to better alternatives.
This window is exactly what cheater could use.
In Leela, open empty SGF file. You can put or remove moves at your will and analyze them.
It is better option than to simply play with Leela, since it gives you more liberty for analysis and to play own moves.
And more important:
Quote:
the GTX 960M that Carlos has
Italian team has
OFFICIALLY sent info on configuration Metta used to PGETC enquiry, and stated it is capable of 100k variations in 30seconds.
Now, since you obviously have info that Metta has stronger machine and that he used it, would you be so kind to forward this information to Ales Cieply?To remind you, your information means that Italian team either lied or withheld information of this to Inquiry, which would be second time.
Jan.van.Rongen wrote:
Then about my AQ diagram
Bojanic wrote:
...
And this is the diagram of game Metta-Ben David in Leela 0.11, which shows remarkably small differences.
No it does not. In the AQ evalaution Black gains a plus after white 70, gains more and then gives it away again. About 5% gain is left. In your diagram, the Leela evaluation it is still at 15% at that point.
Remarkably small differences to Leela's play, not to AQ.Of course it will show bigger differences in other program.
PS could you put here link to AQ program?
It would be good idea to analyze other games with it.