It is currently Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:58 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #281 Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:23 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 5299
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 966
Was liked: 1342
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
jonsa wrote:
... I want to see the conclusion!)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #282 Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:06 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 507
Location: Germany
Liked others: 176
Was liked: 45
Rank: terrible
OGS: paK0, paK0666
Universal go server handle: paK0
I can already see it, ten years from now this game and mine with Kirby will still be going with about a move per year during the more active periods :lol:

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #283 Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 6:39 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 434
Liked others: 64
Was liked: 93
Rank: 4 Dan European
I saw there were new posts, and thought it may be my move...

At least we are using Fibonacci, and not Busy Beaver!

Top
 Profile  
 
Online
 Post subject:
Post #284 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:06 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2169
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Liked others: 2024
Was liked: 1225
Rank: Jp 6 dan
KGS: ez4u
ez4u wrote:
BTW, what is the record for slow play in a Malkovich? This game began on Feb. 26 last year. :)

I posted this in February 2015! :blackeye:

_________________
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #285 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:51 pm 
Tengen

Posts: 4282
Location: North Carolina
Liked others: 449
Was liked: 703
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
I wonder, does everyone involved know whose turn it is?

_________________
Occupy Babel!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #286 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:12 am 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 5299
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 966
Was liked: 1342
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
hyperpape wrote:
I wonder, does everyone involved know whose turn it is?


It is my turn. At last I think it is. Regardless, I'm going to move next.
I just need some time to think about it.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #287 Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 1:36 am 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 5299
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 966
Was liked: 1342
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ -----------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O X . O O X . O . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . O O X X O . O X X . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . X O . X X O . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X O . . . O . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . O O X . X O . X B . O . . . |
$$ | . X . X . . . . . . X O . . . O X . . |
$$ | . O . . X O . . . . X . X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O X X X , X . . . O , O . . |
$$ | . O X O . O O O . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X X O . . . O X . . X O . X . . |
$$ | . . . X O O X . . . . . O O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X . . . . . . . . X . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . X X . X X X X O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . O . . O . O . X . . . |
$$ | . X O X X O O . O X X . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . O O O O . . X O . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------------------------------[/go]


This stone contains his group, and connects to my center group like this:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ -----------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O X . O O X . O . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . O O X X O . O X X . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . X O . X X O . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X O . . . O . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . O O X . X O 1 X B . O . . . |
$$ | . X . X . . . . . . X O . . . O X . . |
$$ | . O . . X O . . . . X . X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O X X X , X . . . O , O . . |
$$ | . O X O . O O O . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X X O . . . O X . . X O . X . . |
$$ | . . . X O O X . . . . . O O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X . . . . . . . . X . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . X X . X X X X O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . O . . O . O . X . . . |
$$ | . X O X X O O . O X X . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . O O O O . . X O . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------------------------------[/go]

or like this:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ -----------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O X . O O X . O . X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . O O X X O . O X X . X . X . |
$$ | . . . . . X O . X X O . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X O . . . O . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . O O X . X O 1 X X . O . . . |
$$ | . X . X . . . . . . X O . . . O X . . |
$$ | . O . . X O . . . . X . X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O X X X , X . . 2 O , O . . |
$$ | . O X O . O O O . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X X O . . . O X . . X O . X . . |
$$ | . . . X O O X . . . . . O O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . X . . . . . . . . X . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . X X . X X X X O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . O . . O . O . X . . . |
$$ | . X O X X O O . O X X . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . O O O O . . X O . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ----------------------------------------[/go]

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #288 Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2019 4:15 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 434
Liked others: 64
Was liked: 93
Rank: 4 Dan European
I read a while ago (maybe in a Kageyama book? Or maybe the Treasure Chest Enigma?) that if your opponent spends 1 hour on a move, you should spend 2 hours on the response.

I moved in November 2017; and the reply was May 2019. So I think that give me 3 years for the next move, or a May 2022 target.


This post by drmwc was liked by 3 people: Bill Spight, daal, jeromie
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #289 Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:35 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 9034
Liked others: 2753
Was liked: 3073
drmwc wrote:
I read a while ago (maybe in a Kageyama book? Or maybe the Treasure Chest Enigma?) that if your opponent spends 1 hour on a move, you should spend 2 hours on the response.


I am put in mind of a story about Emmanuel Lasker by a British player who played against him in a tournament after Lasker was no longer world champion. The player wanted to sacrifice a knight against Lasker, and because it was Lasker, he checked his reading more than once to make sure that the sacrifice was sound. To his surprise, Lasker replied almost immediately, and declined the sacrifice. After the game he asked Lasker how he had figured out his move so quickly. Lasker replied, "If a strong master thinks for a half hour and then offers me a knight, I think I should not take it." ;)

Also, if my opponent thinks for one hour on a move, someone should wake me up. :lol:

_________________
The Adkins Principle:

At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?

— Winona Adkins

Everything with love.


Last edited by Bill Spight on Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

This post by Bill Spight was liked by 3 people: drmwc, jeromie, Joaz Banbeck
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #290 Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2019 7:37 am 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 5299
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 966
Was liked: 1342
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
drmwc wrote:
... I think that give me 3 years for the next move, or a May 2022 target.


Sure. No problem. I wouldn't want you to feel rushed.
But there is an upper bound...https://www.space.com/14732-sun-burns-star-death.html

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: #231 drmwc vs Joaz Banbeck
Post #291 Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2019 11:35 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 21
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 3
drmwc wrote:
I read a while ago (maybe in a Kageyama book? Or maybe the Treasure Chest Enigma?) that if your opponent spends 1 hour on a move, you should spend 2 hours on the response.

I moved in November 2017; and the reply was May 2019. So I think that give me 3 years for the next move, or a May 2022 target.


This bit of advice regarding doubling the time your opponent takes is quoted in a story told by Nakayama in Gokyou Monogatari. A translated version appeared in issue number 50 of "Go World". It involved episodes of contests of endurance during the tournament for qualification for pro shodan in around 1932. In those days no clocks were used in the qualification tournament. Nakayama described two cases. One involved the late Hoshino Toshi whose opponent took eight hours to make a move and Hoshino, quoted his teacher regarding doubling the time, and took 16 hours to make a pretty obvious move. The game continued in this fashion, as did the next two games and Hoshino played for six days without sleep. The other case involved Nakayama's teacher, Suzuki Goro, and Sakata.


This post by bobmcg was liked by 2 people: drmwc, Joaz Banbeck
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group