A confusing game.

Post your games here for other members to critique your play.
Post Reply
User avatar
yakcyll
Dies with sente
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:40 am
Rank: EGF 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: yakcyll
Location: Warsaw, PL
Has thanked: 165 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

A confusing game.

Post by yakcyll »

This is a win I scored this week in a club game against a player who surprised me with many of their moves. The reason I'm putting up a game I won for review is that in the middle of it both a 1D friend of mine and myself concluded that my position is unsatisfying and I pondered whether I should resign. This on its own probably doesn't make it good enough, but after reviewing the game with Leela, it stated that my position was actually very good and the biggest points it suggested made no sense to me in that moment. I am hoping for some concrete guidance here, because I don't know what to think.


Image
The position above (move 67) is the one where I considered conceding the game. If you look at it, White's potential in the center doesn't seem to amount to much, Black's structure seems strong, killing the bottom group of his is not a matter of question, he has a lot of points of his own. And Leela suggests to start cutting in top right! It feels like if I do, Black will concede the stones on the left and just keep ruining White's potential in the center and on top. For me it stands to reason that Leela's suggestions are not of much use to me, because I don't know which area to prioritize and how to proceed technically with saving or ruining points. But then, what went wrong the most before this moment? How to judge this board and ones like it, where there is shared potential, some (semi-?)threatening weaknesses and the opponent just plays solidly enough?
cyndane
Dies in gote
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:02 pm
Rank: 1k KGS
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: A confusing game.

Post by cyndane »

This may not be what you want to hear:

You have 3 black groups fully enclosed at move 67. Keep surrounding groups and you will watch it pay dividends. Once a group is fully surrounded it has no more impact on the rest of the game. This is a big deal. Meanwhile black feels the urgency to rush into your middle. You cut him, and smash him into your strength. Good work!

Keep surrounding groups!
:rambo:
User avatar
Joaz Banbeck
Judan
Posts: 5546
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Location: Banbeck Vale
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 1434 times

Re: A confusing game.

Post by Joaz Banbeck »

At move 46, E5 seemed unnecessarily slow. If you played a little more aggressively, he could get in trouble real fast.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X X X O . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . O X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | 4 X 2 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | 3 . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X 5 . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . O . . . O . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
User avatar
jlt
Gosei
Posts: 1786
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 3:59 am
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 495 times

Re: A confusing game.

Post by jlt »

Maybe

1) Black cannot erase all White's points in the center or on the top.

2) White has some reducing moves (C15 B15 B14, as well as on the right) ?

Hard to evaluate anyway!
User avatar
Joaz Banbeck
Judan
Posts: 5546
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Location: Banbeck Vale
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 1434 times

Re: A confusing game.

Post by Joaz Banbeck »

At move 48, your extension works with these stones:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X X X O . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . O X X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X . X . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . O . . . W . . . . . 1 . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
But a higher move would work with these stones:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X X X O . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . W W W . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X W . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . O X X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X . X . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . , . . . 1 . , X . . |
$$ | . O . . . W . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: A confusing game.

Post by Bill Spight »

yakcyll wrote:This is a win I scored this week in a club game against a player who surprised me with many of their moves. The reason I'm putting up a game I won for review is that in the middle of it both a 1D friend of mine and myself concluded that my position is unsatisfying and I pondered whether I should resign.
I advise DDKs, "Never resign." Maybe that goes for you, as well. :)
This on its own probably doesn't make it good enough, but after reviewing the game with Leela, it stated that my position was actually very good and the biggest points it suggested made no sense to me in that moment. I am hoping for some concrete guidance here, because I don't know what to think.
Early on, when Black shifts to the top side, if you did not have the C-14 - D-14 exchange, C-15 would be a good play. The C-14 - D-14 exchange makes it even better, because that makes that exchange good for White. :) In fact, in a variety of contexts, it remains a good move through most of the game.
Image
The position above (move 67) is the one where I considered conceding the game. If you look at it, White's potential in the center doesn't seem to amount to much, Black's structure seems strong, killing the bottom group of his is not a matter of question, he has a lot of points of his own.
The fact that Black's bottom side group is weak is an important consideration. Not that you can kill it, but if you play first you can probably hold it to small life while erasing Black's moyo on the right. (OC, since you killed the center you did not have to do that.) This Black player seems to have a knack for making small life. ;)
And Leela suggests to start cutting in top right! It feels like if I do, Black will concede the stones on the left and just keep ruining White's potential in the center and on top. For me it stands to reason that Leela's suggestions are not of much use to me, because I don't know which area to prioritize and how to proceed technically with saving or ruining points.
From the looks of this game, you are rather good at fighting. The saying is that thickness is for fighting, not territory. So don't worry about your opponent ruining the potential of your thickness. Even if he managed to live in the center in this game, you could attack his bottom side group and take a big bite out if his right side.

So let me back up cyndane's suggestion. Play for thickness, don't worry about points, and go for the jugular.

Good luck! :D
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
yakcyll
Dies with sente
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:40 am
Rank: EGF 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: yakcyll
Location: Warsaw, PL
Has thanked: 165 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Re: A confusing game.

Post by yakcyll »

cyndane wrote:This may not be what you want to hear:

You have 3 black groups fully enclosed at move 67. Keep surrounding groups and you will watch it pay dividends. Once a group is fully surrounded it has no more impact on the rest of the game. This is a big deal. Meanwhile black feels the urgency to rush into your middle. You cut him, and smash him into your strength. Good work!

Keep surrounding groups!
:rambo:
Sounds good. I'm slowly starting to appreciate the sort of fuzzy advice the more I play and I guess the evidence that the plan to just surround might take me somewhere just keeps piling up.
Joaz Banbeck wrote:At move 46, E5 seemed unnecessarily slow. If you played a little more aggressively, he could get in trouble real fast.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X X X O . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . O X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | 4 X 2 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | 3 . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X 5 . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . O . . . O . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Oh, that looks nasty... Admittedly I didn't really push for killing it because I'm on a murder rehab of sorts, but that shouldn't stop me looking for moves like this and I haven't noticed it before. Cheers!
Joaz Banbeck wrote:At move 48, your extension works with these stones:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X X X O . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . O X X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X . X . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . O . . . W . . . . . 1 . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
But a higher move would work with these stones:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X X X O . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . W W W . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X W . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . O X X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X . X . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . X W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . . . . , . . . 1 . , X . . |
$$ | . O . . . W . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Same with this one. Thanks for these suggestions!
Bill Spight wrote:I advise DDKs, "Never resign." Maybe that goes for you, as well. :)
Definitely something to think about, yeah.
Bill Spight wrote:Early on, when Black shifts to the top side, if you did not have the C-14 - D-14 exchange, C-15 would be a good play. The C-14 - D-14 exchange makes it even better, because that makes that exchange good for White. :) In fact, in a variety of contexts, it remains a good move through most of the game.
This is what sort of confuses me. Especially when Black drops down to C-18, the push doesn't seem to accomplish much (not until some strength appears around there later, I admit I should've noticed that I could easily cut off the three stones). Comparing this position to the other 3-3 joseki one, there the push is actually considered a bad move, so it's unclear to me in here, again, especially after Black shifts to top right, how the push is of any threat to Black.
Bill Spight wrote:The fact that Black's bottom side group is weak is an important consideration. Not that you can kill it, but if you play first you can probably hold it to small life while erasing Black's moyo on the right. (OC, since you killed the center you did not have to do that.) This Black player seems to have a knack for making small life. ;)
Yeah, I definitely don't appreciate how valuable pushing a group around to force it to live can be. I think it will come with time, around when I start considering the efficiency and multi-purpose moves.
Bill Spight wrote:So let me back up cyndane's suggestion. Play for thickness, don't worry about points, and go for the jugular.

Good luck! :D
Much thanks! :)
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: A confusing game.

Post by Bill Spight »

yakcyll wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:Early on, when Black shifts to the top side, if you did not have the C-14 - D-14 exchange, C-15 would be a good play. The C-14 - D-14 exchange makes it even better, because that makes that exchange good for White. :) In fact, in a variety of contexts, it remains a good move through most of the game.
This is what sort of confuses me. Especially when Black drops down to C-18, the push doesn't seem to accomplish much (not until some strength appears around there later, I admit I should've noticed that I could easily cut off the three stones). Comparing this position to the other 3-3 joseki one, there the push is actually considered a bad move, so it's unclear to me in here, again, especially after Black shifts to top right, how the push is of any threat to Black.
If I get what you are talking about, in the other joseki Black has the C-14 stone, but White does not have the D-14 stone. That's a big difference.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . X X X O . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . O O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
In this position :w1: would be a good move. (Deep Leela agrees.) But then :b2: - :w3: would be a bad exchange for Black. That's what makes the push through in the actual game good in a lot of different whole board positions.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Post Reply