Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever good?

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
xela
Lives in gote
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:46 am
Rank: Australian 3 dan
GD Posts: 200
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Has thanked: 219 times
Been thanked: 281 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by xela »

Fascinating and very strange! KataGo doesn't agree with Elf here. What does ELF give as winrates? There's a difference between "black plays this way because it wins the game" versus "black is losing and playing desperate moves to complicate things". KataGo thinks white is 8-12 points ahead in all variations, assuming 7.5 komi.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by Bill Spight »

xela wrote:Fascinating and very strange! KataGo doesn't agree with Elf here. What does ELF give as winrates? There's a difference between "black plays this way because it wins the game" versus "black is losing and playing desperate moves to complicate things". KataGo thinks white is 8-12 points ahead in all variations, assuming 7.5 komi.
My first thought when seeing the cut was, If this were a human we might say that Black is looking for a place to resign. ;)

I didn't give any winrate differences because they are misleading so close to 0 or 100%. Here are Elf's winrates at pertinent points.

In the game record, :b73:, the second line hane. Black 4.0% (41.9k rollouts); :b81:, the switcheroo ponnuki, Black 1.1% (120.6k rollouts).

In the usual variation, :b75:,the third line atari to prepare the usual ponnuki, Black 4.1% (71.8k rollouts).

In the cut variation, :b73: the fourth line cut, Black 5.3% (79.9k rollouts).

The 3% winrate difference between the usual ponnuki and the switcheroo is huge so near to 0%. And the 1.2% difference between the cut and the usual ponnuki is not so small, either. Here is where KataGo's point differences are easier to interpret than winrate differences, if not in general. :)

----

Elf also proposes a variation to save the corner, starting with :b77: below, with a winrate estimate of 2.3% (29.9k rollouts).
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm69 Save the corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . 5 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 3 4 0 . . . . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . 7 2 O 9 . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | . 8 . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . O , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . X . X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . O X . O . |
$$ | . . O X . . X . . X . . . . X O O . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O X . , . X . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . O O X . O X O O X . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . X O O O O X X . O . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm79 Save the corner. continued
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 1 X X O O . . . . . . . O . O O O . |
$$ | . X O O X . . . . , . . . . X X X O . |
$$ | 9 O 3 4 . . . . . . . . X . . . X X . |
$$ | . 7 5 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . 8 6 . 0 . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . O , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . X . X . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . O X . O . |
$$ | . . O X . . X . . X . . . . X O O . . |
$$ | . . O X . X O X . , . X . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . O O X . O X O O X . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . X O O O O X X . O . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
lightvector
Lives in sente
Posts: 759
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:11 pm
Rank: maybe 2d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 916 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by lightvector »

With 7.5 komi, using a recent 40-block KataGo net (this particular one not released, but should be similar to the ones released), about 100k playouts:

* Regular ponnuki - 4.4% winrate for black, behind by about 9 points.
* Switcheroo ponnuki - 1.6% winrate for black, behind by about 13 points.
* Elf sacrifice variation - 2.8% winrate for black, behind by about 12.5 points.
* Elf save corner variation - 2.6% winrate for black, behind by about 10.5 points.

For the latter three, often KataGo wants to deviate at various points mid-variation as well for both sides. Overall it thinks the regular ponnuki is the correct variation.

In the first three cases black's next move after getting sente is to cut at O10. In the last case, it's to block at Q2.
xela
Lives in gote
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:46 am
Rank: Australian 3 dan
GD Posts: 200
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Has thanked: 219 times
Been thanked: 281 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by xela »

Bill Spight wrote:I didn't give any winrate differences because they are misleading so close to 0 or 100%.
OK, so it's firmly in the "playing desperate moves from a lost position" camp. Hard to say that one variation is better than another in this context.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by Bill Spight »

xela wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:I didn't give any winrate differences because they are misleading so close to 0 or 100%.
OK, so it's firmly in the "playing desperate moves from a lost position" camp. Hard to say that one variation is better than another in this context.
Indeed. :) My guess is that with perfect play by White Black is a goner. What's best depends upon White's imperfections.

It could be that both KataGo and Elf are right, in the sense that each chooses the line of play that gives itself, as White, the most trouble. ;)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
lightvector
Lives in sente
Posts: 759
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:11 pm
Rank: maybe 2d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 916 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by lightvector »

If you set the komi to -2.5, KataGo thinks the game is much closer to fair. It thinks black is still 0.5 points behind, which is not entirely consistent with its estimation of black in the original state being behind by 0.5, since black has just gained 10 points over its initial estimate of black behind by 9. Possibly this is due to the search now exploring significantly different lines *after* the corner sequence due to the closer winrate for how black should handle the white center group.

But anyways, it still believes that the regular ponnuki is the best option, and that all the other options lose both points and a lot of winrate compared to the regular ponnuki. The score *differences* it gives for the various options are actually still reasonably consistent with the 7.5 komi evaluation - about 4 points loss for switcheroo, about 3 points loss for sacrificing, and about 1-1.5 points loss for saving the corner, although this time I only waited for a few tens of thousands of playouts on each instead of 100k.

It also thinks that one of white's moves on the corner saving variation is a significant mistake, white can do better if black tries to play this way. Given that at this point, KataGo should usually be quite a bit stronger than ELF, and that at least its preferences line up pretty well between the komi-adjusted and non-komi-adjusted cases, I'm inclined to distrust ELF here about what the "correct" variation is, except insofar as maybe ELF could be evaluating the winrate correctly "for itself" as Bill suggested.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by Bill Spight »

lightvector wrote:If you set the komi to -2.5, KataGo thinks the game is much closer to fair. It thinks black is still 0.5 points behind, which is not entirely consistent with its estimation of black in the original state being behind by 0.5, since black has just gained 10 points over its initial estimate of black behind by 9. Possibly this is due to the search now exploring significantly different lines *after* the corner sequence due to the closer winrate for how black should handle the white center group.
In the search for the margin of error for winrates, I considered using the log of the odds ratio instead. However, I decided not to bother, because it seems to me that when the winrate is near 0 or 100%, the search will be greatly affected. So I just take winrate estimates less than 10% or greater than 90% with a large grain of salt. I don't know if this matters for KataGo and point estimates, however.

I like the idea of setting komi with KataGo for analytical purposes. For one thing, my guess is that the top choices will be closer to correct play, instead of desperation measures. That's closer to how humans try to do analysis, anyway. As for making plays that put the game on the line (勝負手) or looking for a place to resign, we humans are rather good at that, when playing against other humans. The bot equivalent often strikes us as silly. ;)
It also thinks that one of white's moves on the corner saving variation is a significant mistake, white can do better if black tries to play this way. Given that at this point, KataGo should usually be quite a bit stronger than ELF, and that at least its preferences line up pretty well between the komi-adjusted and non-komi-adjusted cases, I'm inclined to distrust ELF here about what the "correct" variation is, except insofar as maybe ELF could be evaluating the winrate correctly "for itself" as Bill suggested.
There is a phenomenon with chess engines that may appear with go bots, as well, that humans are not able in some positions, to apply the AI evaluations. GM Ben Finegold sometimes points out that engines may evaluate the position his is discussing as even or nearly so, but that he and other human GMs much prefer one side or the other, typically the side with an attack, because the engines know how to defend against the attack, but humans don't.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Is the 3-3 double hane switcheroo ponnuki joseki ever go

Post by Bill Spight »

In the exception that Uberdude found, Elf agrees with LZ that :w74: should be the kick at a, and also that :w80: is better than the atari at b.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm74 Elf and LZ agree
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . a X . . . . . . . . . 2 1 . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X 3 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b 6 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . O X X . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . . . . . . O O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . O . . O . . . O X X O O X |
$$ | . . . . X X . . . O X O X O X . X X . |
$$ | . . O . O X . . O O . . O O X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X O X X X O X O . O . . |
$$ | . . . O . X . . X O . . X X . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . O X . . . X . . . X . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
For :w80:, Elf still likes the kick, with this mainline variation.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm80 Kick first
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . 1 X . . 5 . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . O . 2 . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 X O . |
$$ | . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . O X X . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . . . . . . O O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . O . . O . . . O X X O O X |
$$ | . . . . X X . . . O X O X O X . X X . |
$$ | . . O . O X . . O O . . O O X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X O X X X O X O . O . . |
$$ | . . . O . X . . X O . . X X . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . O X . . . X . . . X . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
After the keima, :w82:, :b83: makes the solid connection, and then :w84: pincers the two Black stones. White is playing catch-up. Perhaps we can consider this pincer a shobute.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Game position
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O X X . |
$$ | . . . . O X . . W . . . . . O X O . . |
$$ | . . . O . X . . . , . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X O . |
$$ | . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . O X X . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . . . . . . O O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . O . . O . . . O X X O O X |
$$ | . . . . X X . . . O X O X O X . X X . |
$$ | . . O . O X . . O O . . O O X X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X O X X X O X O . O . . |
$$ | . . . O . X . . X O . . X X . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . O X . . . X . . . X . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
White makes the same pincer in the game, but this way it is backed up by the ponnuki in the top right. This way may be better versus another human. White did go on to win the game. ;)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Post Reply