A question about goproblems.com

If you're new to the game and have questions, post them here.
User avatar
CSamurai
Lives in gote
Posts: 348
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 2:50 am
Rank: KGS4k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: CSamurai
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: A question about goproblems.com

Post by CSamurai »

Bill Spight wrote: (I would love to do some experiments, but that is not so easy in the West. Where am I going to find 200 DDKs for a controlled experiment?)



You create them. You get a certain number of people who have never played go. You give them a rule book, teach them go problems that get them to a certain level of problem solving competence, and then you use different problems with similar themes, or slightly more complexe (3 move sequences, rather than 2 move answers) sequences to solve in the study itself.

But, I shouldn't be here. I already hijacked the thread once apparently.

CSam
hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: A question about goproblems.com

Post by hyperpape »

CSam: you might be able to get decent results (though you're talking about a huge and expensive experiment) but there'd be a problem with ecological validity. Normal go players will have different motivational sets and talents than people selected at random, or via any procedure other than looking at people who are motivated to play go. Facts about how they learn may not match how go players learn.
User avatar
judicata
Lives in sente
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
Rank: KGS 1k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: judicata
Location: New York, NY
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 150 times

Re: A question about goproblems.com

Post by judicata »

hyperpape wrote:CSam: you might be able to get decent results (though you're talking about a huge and expensive experiment) but there'd be a problem with ecological validity. Normal go players will have different motivational sets and talents than people selected at random, or via any procedure other than looking at people who are motivated to play go. Facts about how they learn may not match how go players learn.



No study is perfect. I think the self-selection-in-study-participants dilemma is practically (literally?) a field of study in itself.

Here, I don't think it'd be a show-stopper. The study would still provide interesting information.
nnk
Dies in gote
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:31 am
Rank: triple-digit-kyu
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: A question about goproblems.com

Post by nnk »

here is what an actual pro had to say about this (just before becoming a pro)

Jochen: Do you sometimes study the "Lessons in the Fundamentals of Go?"

Hans: Sure. Also, I do two hours of tsume go every day. No difficult problems, more easy ones, but a large number of them. I put them into a file and I use them to practice recognizing a shape at first glance without thinking much, which means to internalize the shape. Of course I do some difficult ones too.


he was surely not a kyu player at the time ;). i'm just posting this as it might force us to think twice about how strong players think/train, how their brains work.

the whole interview is here (and very interesting imho)

http://361points.com/hans/

hope this helps ;)
Post Reply