Game againist gnugo
-
Shannarino
- Beginner
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 11:27 am
- GD Posts: 0
Game againist gnugo
Hi,
i am a beginner player and this is probably the first game i win without any suggestion.
What do you think about it?
What errors i have done?
What is my level?
I can start to play in a 19*19 board?
Thank you.
(I apologize for my bad english.)
i am a beginner player and this is probably the first game i win without any suggestion.
What do you think about it?
What errors i have done?
What is my level?
I can start to play in a 19*19 board?
Thank you.
(I apologize for my bad english.)
- Attachments
-
- 13game.sgf
- (1.58 KiB) Downloaded 827 times
- Li Kao
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:37 am
- Rank: KGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: LiKao / Loki
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 102 times
Re: Game againist gnugo
Which color are you? white? And I embedded your sgf so it can be viewed without download:
Sanity is for the weak.
-
Shannarino
- Beginner
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 11:27 am
- GD Posts: 0
Re: Game againist gnugo
My color is Black.
May i have to correct the third question, it (probably) must be: "Wich is my level". Sorry but i speak very bad english.
Thank you for embedding the sgf file.
May i have to correct the third question, it (probably) must be: "Wich is my level". Sorry but i speak very bad english.
Thank you for embedding the sgf file.
- Li Kao
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:37 am
- Rank: KGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: LiKao / Loki
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 102 times
Re: Game againist gnugo
I'd estimate that you're between 20-25k. But just come on KGS an play a few games to learn what rank you are. Playing humans is more fun than playing an AI.
Sanity is for the weak.
- daniel_the_smith
- Gosei
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
- Rank: 2d AGA
- GD Posts: 1193
- KGS: lavalamp
- Tygem: imapenguin
- IGS: lavalamp
- OGS: daniel_the_smith
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Has thanked: 152 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
- Contact:
Re: Game againist gnugo
Move 47 in that game is not good, there's no need to do that right then. Understanding why this is so will raise your level. 
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
- Dusk Eagle
- Gosei
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:02 pm
- Rank: 4d
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 378 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
Re: Game againist gnugo
Same with move 63 
We don't know who we are; we don't know where we are.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
- emeraldemon
- Gosei
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: greendemon
- Tygem: greendemon
- DGS: smaragdaemon
- OGS: emeraldemon
- Has thanked: 697 times
- Been thanked: 287 times
-
alejo
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 4:10 am
- Rank: KGS 5 kyu
- GD Posts: 442
- KGS: alejo
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 25 times
Re: Game againist gnugo
Here's my advice:
While playing against gnugo is comfortable (always available, different difficulty levels, custom time limits), playing with it too much isn't good at all.
This is mainly due to its playing style: AI sometimes allow you to play moves a human player would never. AI fail to judge the life-or-death status of certain groups, so you can kill a group which should have lived.
Though most of us started training with gnugo (or MFOG), you should try to get onto human vs human games.
While playing against gnugo is comfortable (always available, different difficulty levels, custom time limits), playing with it too much isn't good at all.
This is mainly due to its playing style: AI sometimes allow you to play moves a human player would never. AI fail to judge the life-or-death status of certain groups, so you can kill a group which should have lived.
Though most of us started training with gnugo (or MFOG), you should try to get onto human vs human games.
My blog about Go and Boardgames: Alejo's Tenuki
-
Mike Novack
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:36 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: Game againist gnugo
Another opinion.
I could be way wrong about this but I believe the AI opponents CAN be useful if used properly. Most of the criticism I see is most valid for the situation when they are being MISused.
a) To play even games, play against humans, not against the computer. As many people have explained it will not be making the same sort of mistakes as a human opponent would. In other words, while over all playing at some level it's not making the right/typical mistakes of a human player at that level.
b) To learn with the computer as the opponent it should have its strength setting set for several stones stronger than you are (and then you take the appropriate handicap). Now it should not be making mistakes expected of an opponent of your own level and should be able to punish you when you make a mistake (so you learn).
c) I am NOT meaning to say that it wouldn't be even better to be playing against a human opponent 4-5 stones stronger than you are. But is it likely to have a variety of human opponents willing to play a large number of games against you under those conditions? My opinion is just that playing a lot of games against a computer program set to be about that much stronger than you are might be a good way of learning compared to playing that same number of games against a human of your own strength (you make mistakes but your opponent isn't able to punish them).
d) This advice is also dependent somewhat on your level. More useful once your strength has gotten to the point where your computer opponent would be one of the strongest currently available. These are aggressive, good at fighting, and will not always make the same move in the same situation. You can't assme that the same program set to one of its weak settings will be a weaker version of the same (may be using a different algorithm and may be passive).
I could be way wrong about this but I believe the AI opponents CAN be useful if used properly. Most of the criticism I see is most valid for the situation when they are being MISused.
a) To play even games, play against humans, not against the computer. As many people have explained it will not be making the same sort of mistakes as a human opponent would. In other words, while over all playing at some level it's not making the right/typical mistakes of a human player at that level.
b) To learn with the computer as the opponent it should have its strength setting set for several stones stronger than you are (and then you take the appropriate handicap). Now it should not be making mistakes expected of an opponent of your own level and should be able to punish you when you make a mistake (so you learn).
c) I am NOT meaning to say that it wouldn't be even better to be playing against a human opponent 4-5 stones stronger than you are. But is it likely to have a variety of human opponents willing to play a large number of games against you under those conditions? My opinion is just that playing a lot of games against a computer program set to be about that much stronger than you are might be a good way of learning compared to playing that same number of games against a human of your own strength (you make mistakes but your opponent isn't able to punish them).
d) This advice is also dependent somewhat on your level. More useful once your strength has gotten to the point where your computer opponent would be one of the strongest currently available. These are aggressive, good at fighting, and will not always make the same move in the same situation. You can't assme that the same program set to one of its weak settings will be a weaker version of the same (may be using a different algorithm and may be passive).
- Joaz Banbeck
- Judan
- Posts: 5546
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
- Rank: 1D AGA
- GD Posts: 1512
- Kaya handle: Test
- Location: Banbeck Vale
- Has thanked: 1080 times
- Been thanked: 1434 times
Re: Game againist gnugo
Shannarino wrote:Hi,
i am a beginner player and this is probably the first game i win without any suggestion.
What do you think about it?
Any first win is a good game.
Shannarino wrote:What errors i have done?
Move 47 is not necessary. It fills your own territory.
Look at the board at the end of the game. Remove the stone that you played at move 47. Now you have one more point.
Move 63 also is not necessary. It also fills your own territory, and loses one point.
Shannarino wrote:What is my level?
Approximately 25 kyu.
Shannarino wrote:I can start to play in a 19*19 board?
You are not ready yet. On a small board, there is a shorter time between cause and effect. If you make a bad move on a small board, you will see the bad result sooner.
Shannarino wrote:(I apologize for my bad english.)
Please do not apologize. You speak English better than we speak Italian.
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207