Tommie wrote:ethanb wrote:Even disregarding flOvermind's (correct, I believe) argument from conservation of momentum, there is also the point that the collision with the insect is partly elastic. I didn't see you mention "a spherical mosquito of uniform density" but you did say that it squished. Therefore the transfer of kinetic energy actually took place over time, not in a single instant. So zero wasn't a factor anyway.
Did we book-wise

think of masses, carrying on their movevements frictionless for eternity through imaginary endless space?
Sorry for merging the quote blocks like that, but that was what I was getting at with the "spherical mosquito of uniform density" bit - the "reality vs. theory" (or rather an incomplete theory) idea. There's an old joke that I don't actually know, but have seen/heard a reference to somewhere, and the punchline is something like "and the physicist goes 'First you have to assume a spherical chicken of uniform density!'" Oh, and the "therefore" was related to the squishing, not to the shape or density of the mosquito.
And yeah, I knew it was a puzzle to enjoy - and I was, just in a joking tone. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that.

But no, the mass of the mosquito is comparatively so small that even if it were a completely inelastic collision, its velocity would have to oppose the train's at an appreciable fraction of the speed of light before it made a noticeable impact.