All AGA Members tournament

The home for discussions about the AGA.
rubin427
Lives in gote
Posts: 338
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:24 pm
GD Posts: 0
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Has thanked: 163 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: All AGA Members tournament

Post by rubin427 »

DrStraw wrote:
xed_over wrote:turns out, this is not an AGA requirement, but rather its a requirement of the sponsor - Young Kwon.


Then I think the AGA should disassociate itself with the tournament. Let him run it by himself.


I find this comment really disrespectful to both Young Kwon and the AGA.

Honestly, has anyone who is personally impacted by this rule made a personal appeal for an exception? Did we even give the AGA a chance to respond or perhaps even be gracious about it?

Or we just started in with assumptions and complaints?

Effective communication is a two way street.
xed_over
Oza
Posts: 2264
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:51 am
Has thanked: 1179 times
Been thanked: 553 times

Re: All AGA Members tournament

Post by xed_over »

xed_over wrote:turns out, this is not an AGA requirement, but rather its a requirement of the sponsor - Young Kwon.

the only news I've heard so far is that this requirement will remain.
vash3g
Lives with ko
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:49 pm
Rank: 5k
GD Posts: 111
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 87 times

Re: All AGA Members tournament

Post by vash3g »

rubin427 wrote:Effective communication is a two way street.


The AGA has a serious problem in this area. I would like to point out that we are STILL waiting on an official board statement about the dissolution of the 10 game rule...

I don't want to get back into that again.
Decisions are made by those who show up.
and possibly those willing to attend secret meetings in ancient basements
Post Reply